Re: [tor-relays] Tor t-shirts

[Dylan Issa]

It's running at a solid 10MByte/s, i have about 60 days of uptime just around 
50 days my Tor daemon crashed and it took me about a day to realize and fix it. 
Do I need to wait another 60 days, or does the concurrency not matter and I'll 
still be eligible? Thanks.

Sent from my iPhone

> On 21 Oct 2017, at 09:06, Roger Dingledine <a...@mit.edu> wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 12:28:34AM +0100, Dylan Issa wrote:
>> To add on this, if my Tor relay was restarted for a reason (resets downtime) 
>> but previously had ~50 days uptime, if I get the remaining 10 days am I 
>> eligible? Or must it be at least 60 days of continuous uptime?
>> Because I had 50 days, so if I need to wait another 2 months that???ll be 
>> depressing
> 
> When I originally wrote the qualifying text, I definitely did not mean
> to require an uptime of 60 days. I think my thought process was more
> that if you have downtime in the 60 days, then your relay's throughput
> needs to be proportionally higher to account for the time where your
> speed is effectively 0. And I guess there is some unspecified threshold
> where you have so much downtime in the 60 days that you can't really
> argue that you were "running the relay for the past two months".
> 
> That said, the folks handling tshirt requests are the real arbiters
> of how they are interpreting my sentences, so I will defer to them. :)
> 
> --Roger
> 
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Tor t-shirts

[Dylan Issa]

To add on this, if my Tor relay was restarted for a reason (resets downtime) 
but previously had ~50 days uptime, if I get the remaining 10 days am I 
eligible? Or must it be at least 60 days of continuous uptime?
Because I had 50 days, so if I need to wait another 2 months that’ll be 
depressing

> On Oct 20, 2017, at 9:48 PM, TorGate  wrote:
> 
> Thats a god idea :-)
> 
> 
> 
>> Am 20.10.2017 um 22:18 schrieb Sebastian Urbach :
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Regarding the shirts:
>> 
>> https://www.torproject.org/getinvolved/tshirt.html
>> --
>> Sincerely yours / M.f.G. / Sincères salutations
>> 
>> Sebastian Urbach
>> 
>> ---
>> Those who surrender freedom for security
>> will not have, nor do they deserve, either one.
>> ---
>> Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Am 20. Oktober 2017 21:46:46 schrieb Tyler Johnson :
>> 
>>> On Oct 20, 2017 14:38, "Vasilis"  wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Has everyone eligible for a Tor t-shirt got one already?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> What is the criteria for said eligibility?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> ___
>>> tor-relays mailing list
>>> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
>>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> tor-relays mailing list
>> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] spurios warning about using the nickname instead of the key

[Dylan Issa]

Maybe they're truncated, but they still need to start with a $On 12 October 2017 at 20:09 Sebastian Hahn <m...@sebastianhahn.net> wrote:Hi there,On 12. Oct 2017, at 20:43, Scott Bennett <benn...@sdf.org> wrote:teor <teor2...@gmail.com> wrote:On 12 Oct 2017, at 13:21, Toralf F?rster <toralf.foers...@gmx.de> wrote:-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA256On 10/11/2017 10:08 AM, Dylan Issa wrote:Did you set MyFamily using nicknames of the key?Because if nickname, change it to key is basically what it?s saying.No,both Tor processes share this common config file:grep -i famil /etc/tor/torrc*/*/etc/tor/torrc.d/00_common:MyFamily 1AF72E8906E6C49481A791A6F8F84F8DFEBBB2BA,6EABEBF38CE7E3DF672C4DB01383606FE3EB2215Doessn't each fingerprint need to start with a $ character? Otherwiseit's just a really long nickname, right?No; nicknames are at most 20 characters long.CheersSebastian___tor-relays mailing listtor-relays@lists.torproject.orghttps://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
 
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] spurios warning about using the nickname instead of the key

[Dylan Issa]

What the fuck I didn’t even encrypt it >.>
What I said was:
Did you set MyFamily using nicknames of the key? 
Because if nickname, change it to key is basically what it’s saying.
> On Oct 10, 2017, at 8:38 PM, grarpamp  wrote:
> 
>> and pgpdump says:
>> Dylan, you seem to have encrypted this to 
> 
> Should have used throw-keyids ;)
> And/or it could be a proof...
> 
>> (pgp/gpg usability ftw)
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] spurios warning about using the nickname instead of the key

[Dylan Issa]

binuZcno3sP4G.bin
Description: PGP/MIME Versions Identification


encrypted.asc
Description: OpenPGP encrypted message
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Running both Transmission server and Tor relay

[Dylan Issa]

It shouldn't even matter if you torrent if you run an exit: when they 
say torrenting through Tor is bad: they mean as a client (using a SOCKS 
proxy to run your downloads through the Tor network), not torrenting 
whilst running a relay/exit.


Running transmission alongside a Tor relay/exit won't do anything or 
degrade anything (unless, of course, torrenting is taking up 99% of your 
bandwidth and the Tor relay can only access 1% of it, naturally)


Hope this clears things up for you.


On 07/10/2017 15:22, Ch1keen wrote:
> Even if it(running both exit node and Transmission daemon) is, I 
don't think you would see too much degradation on the torrent side of 
things.


And side of tor network, right?

> Does this answer your question?
Yes, Thank you Robert so much!!


___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Individual Operator Exit Probability Threshold

[Dylan Issa]

Definitely be careful, though, especially if they’re from the same hosting 
provider account. It will increase the chance of receiving an abuse report: and 
if someone is using Tor to attack and your exits are all picked then that 
chance just unfortunately increased. It would be a shame to get your nodes 
instant terminated in that event. 
Be careful ;) 

> On Sep 22, 2017, at 2:55 PM, John Ricketts  wrote:
> 
> Thanks Tim, this is the general idea of “If you build it they will come.”  
> 
> I simply don’t want to be a risk.
> 
> John
> 
> On Sep 22, 2017, at 08:19, teor  > wrote:
> 
>> 
>>> On 22 Sep 2017, at 23:04, John Ricketts >> > wrote:
>>> 
>>> All,
>>> 
>>> I have brought this question  up in meetings in Seattle and other places so 
>>> some of you may have already heard me ask this question.  So, at risk of 
>>> repeating the question for some... here goes.
>>> 
>>> I am about to fire up more Exit Relays  and if I do so I will jump from my 
>>> roughly 3% of Exit Probability to what technically could easily reach 6-8%.
>>> 
>>> I would like to know everyone’s opinion on having an individual operator 
>>> have that much exit share.  In my case, all the traffic would be coming 
>>> from the same AS as well, but distributed over four different cities with 
>>> different upstream carriers.
>>> 
>>> Please chime in, if I get the a green light from the discussion it will 
>>> happen within a month.
>> 
>> Thank you for supporting Tor!
>> And thank you for asking in advance.
>> 
>> More exit relays are good, and we should encourage people who want to
>> help the network.
>> 
>> This is a reminder that we need more exit operators, running more large
>> exits. If we think your exit share is a problem, the best way to make
>> that problem go away is to add other exits.
>> 
>> We're also working on better geographic diversity in bandwidth
>> authorities, and this may cause relay weights to shift a bit. So that's
>> another way we could end up resolving this issue :-)
>> 
>> T
>> 
>> --
>> Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)
>> 
>> teor2345 at gmail dot com
>> PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B
>> ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n
>> xmpp: teor at torproject dot org
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> tor-relays mailing list
>> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org 
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays 
>> 
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Horizons Relay Figerprint

[Dylan Issa]

Kurt,
We are both on OVH but I am on the FRA side, yet my graph seems much more 
steady (and I have more flags than you), despite having slightly less bandwidth 
and slightly less uptime. Is your server being hammered by something or in use 
somewhere else?
My similar node:
E08CD0147F9DC5C2383B84D8C052FE9A83DAFB4B

> On Sep 21, 2017, at 11:30 PM, Kurt Besig  wrote:
> 
> E65D300F11E1DB12C534B0146BDAB6972F1A8A48

___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] tor-relays Digest, Vol 80, Issue 26

[Dylan Issa]

I should think they’d be fine, considering they “allow" scanning on their 
servers.
If they were VPSs on the OVH range they’d care, but for a dedi as long as 
they’re not DoSing or getting insane amounts of abuse reports you’ll be fine.
If you look at the ASN on atlas there are a few long-living Tor exit nodes 
running on Kimsufi/SoYouStart/OVH
> On Sep 19, 2017, at 4:58 PM, King Queen  wrote:
> 
> For an exit node?! They will most definitely not be fine; they don't
> allow them and they don't like any admin hassle at all as a result of
> their ultra-cheap kimsufi dedis. The first whiff of an abuse complaint
> and they'll nuke the server and probably the account.
> 
> Monday, September 18, 2017, 10:06:24 PM, you wrote:
> 
>> Tried Kimsufi? I believe that’ll be fine.
> 
>> On Sep 18, 2017, at 5:27 PM, flipchan  wrote:
> 
>> https://okservers.net/ doesn't provide vps :/ something like a good
>> ISP that tolerate exit nodes would be good like something in holland maybe?
> 
> 
>> On September 18, 2017 1:50:45 AM GMT+02:00,
>> tor-relays-requ...@lists.torproject.org wrote:
>> Send tor-relays mailing list submissions to
>> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> 
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> tor-relays-requ...@lists.torproject.org
> 
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> tor-relays-ow...@lists.torproject.org
> 
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of tor-relays digest..."
> 
> 
>> Today's Topics:
> 
>> 1. Re: Tolerant hosting for exit node. (King Queen)
>> 2. Re: Tolerant hosting for exit node. (Alec Larsen)
>> 3. Re: Tolerant hosting for exit node. (nusenu)
>> 4. Re: Tolerant hosting for exit node. (nusenu)
>> 5. Re: Tolerant hosting for exit node. (George)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 19:59:12 +0100
>> From: King Queen 
>> To: armenian_priest 
>> Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Tolerant hosting for exit node.
>> Message-ID: <1674967117.20170917195...@gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
>> https://box.cock.li FTW
> 
>> yeah it's servers with cocks, but it is in Romania / IP location the
>> Seychelles, and I have had no issues with my exit node on them.
> 
> 
> 
>> Sunday, September 17, 2017, 11:32:33 AM, you wrote:
> 
> 
>> Hello list,
> 
> 
> 
>> I was hoping to get a good suggestion from here for a hosting provider
>> that is tolerant with Tor exit nodes.
> 
> 
> 
>> I went through the mailing list archive a few months back and there 
>> weren't any good suggestions on hosting providers.
> 
> 
> 
>> Also, I checked the 'GoodBadISPs' page in the Tor wiki but it is pretty
>> outdated and I already got burned with one provider from there: ITLDC,
>> it was added on 2016-04-23 but they bluntly stated that they DO NOT 
>> tolerate exit nodes after 2 abuse complaints, my exit node was running
>> for 1 month there.
> 
> 
> 
>> One of the abuses was handled but with the second one they basically 
>> wanted me to block HTTP/S traffic on the VPS.
> 
> 
> 
>> I am not sure who edits and keeps track of the mentioned page but it 
>> would be a good idea to remove the mentioned provider from there so 
>> other people wont waste their money.
> 
> 
> 
>> Hope to get some recommendations since I want to support the network 
>> with an exit node.
> 
> 
> 
>> Thanks in advance!
> 
> 
> 
>> With regards,
> 
> 
> 
>> jack
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> tor-relays mailing list
>> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> -- 
>> Take Care Sincerely flipchan layerprox
>> dev___
>> tor-relays mailing list
>> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 
> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Kingmailto:kingqueen...@gmail.com
> 
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] tor-relays Digest, Vol 80, Issue 26

[Dylan Issa]

Tried Kimsufi? I believe that’ll be fine.
> On Sep 18, 2017, at 5:27 PM, flipchan  wrote:
> 
> https://okservers.net / doesn't provide vps :/ 
> something like a good ISP that tolerate exit nodes would be good like 
> something in holland maybe? 
> 
> On September 18, 2017 1:50:45 AM GMT+02:00, 
> tor-relays-requ...@lists.torproject.org wrote:
> Send tor-relays mailing list submissions to
>  tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>  https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays 
> 
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>  tor-relays-requ...@lists.torproject.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>  tor-relays-ow...@lists.torproject.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of tor-relays digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>1. Re: Tolerant hosting for exit node. (King Queen)
>2. Re: Tolerant hosting for exit node. (Alec Larsen)
>3. Re: Tolerant hosting for exit node. (nusenu)
>4. Re: Tolerant hosting for exit node. (nusenu)
>5. Re: Tolerant hosting for exit node. (George)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 19:59:12 +0100
> From: King Queen 
> To: armenian_priest 
> Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Tolerant hosting for exit node.
> Message-ID: <1674967117.20170917195...@gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> https://box.cock.li  FTW
> 
> yeah it's servers with cocks, but it is in Romania / IP location the
> Seychelles, and I have had no issues with my exit node on them.
> 
> 
> 
> Sunday, September 17, 2017, 11:32:33 AM, you wrote:
> 
>  Hello list,
> 
>  I was hoping to get a good suggestion from here for a hosting provider
>  that is tolerant with Tor exit nodes.
> 
>  I went through the mailing list archive a few months back and there 
>  weren't any good suggestions on hosting providers.
> 
>  Also, I checked the 'GoodBadISPs' page in the Tor wiki but it is pretty
>  outdated and I already got burned with one provider from there: ITLDC,
>  it was added on 2016-04-23 but they bluntly stated that they DO NOT 
>  tolerate exit nodes after 2 abuse complaints, my exit node was running
>  for 1 month there.
> 
>  One of the abuses was handled but with the second one they basically 
>  wanted me to block HTTP/S traffic on the VPS.
> 
>  I am not sure who edits and keeps track of the mentioned page but it 
>  would be a good idea to remove the mentioned provider from there so 
>  other people wont waste their money.
> 
>  Hope to get some recommendations since I want to support the network 
>  with an exit node.
> 
>  Thanks in advance!
> 
>  With regards,
> 
>  jack
> 
> 
> 
>  tor-relays mailing list
>  tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
>  https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Take Care Sincerely flipchan layerprox dev
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays