Re: [tor-relays] Tor bandwith question

On Tue, 1 Nov 2016, at 11:42 AM, teor wrote: > > > On 1 Nov. 2016, at 15:58, wrote: > > > > In order to clarify this once and for all: If I setup a Tor relay with 200 > > kBps, do I slow down the Tor network? What amount of bandwith is needed in > >

Re: [tor-relays] most (>57% cwfr) of the tor network still vulnerable to CVE-2016-8860 - update your relay!

On Wed, 26 Oct 2016, at 02:04 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote: > If you're using Debian jessie, you can get an 0.2.8.9 package from > either backports or the torproject.org repository. I went with > backports because that let me also pick up a much newer openssl. > > zw Zack, Interesting, I too

Re: [tor-relays] CVE-2015-7547 Tor network stats

Based on the exploit, aren't, at most, only the exits vulnerable? I didn't think middles would do any DNS resolving. Those like me running debian and putting off doing a reboot might find needrestart (package of same name) and checkrestart (package debian-goodies) useful. On Tue, 23 Feb 2016, at

Re: [tor-relays] tor-arm bandwidth state file -xxxx seconds is missing?

If I've understood your question: press i and select 1 second, then enter. Press h for other keyboard options. On Fri, 29 Jan 2016, at 12:17 AM, SuperSluether wrote: > How would I change the interval? Arm keeps telling me there's no armrc > loaded, and to see the sample file for options, but

Re: [tor-relays] Relay configuration issue "Could not bind to 0.0.0.0:443: Permission denied"

Try restart instead of reload. It looks like you've installed from a package, which allows the daemon to bind to any port then "drop privileges" (according to the FAQ). https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq.html.en#PackagedTor On Mon, 18 Jan 2016, at 12:26 AM, AJ NOURI wrote: > *sudo service tor