Hi,
I facilitated the meetup at FOSDEM, last Sunday, and I wanted to report
back on what happened, and what worked (or did not).
We had around 20 people, with relatively little overlap with the 34C3 meetup (I
could be wrong, though, as I'm bad at recognising faces). This seems quite good,
esp.
On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 11:31:18AM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Scheduling sucessful: Tor relays meet up @4pm tomorrow, FOSDEM, room H.3227.
Since some people seem confused (*cough* arma *cough*):
“Tomorrow 4pm” is Sunday, 4pm Central European Time
:P
sign
Hi,
Scheduling sucessful: Tor relays meet up @4pm tomorrow, FOSDEM, room H.3227.
Best,
nicoo, who accidentally put on an orange shirt
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 08:18:51PM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 12:07:43AM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Sant
Hi again,
On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 12:07:43AM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I might be able to organise a relays operators meetup at FOSDEM, early
> February.
> (This is contingent on me being able to come, though.)
>
> I wanted to ask whether there are othe
Hi,
I might be able to organise a relays operators meetup at FOSDEM, early February.
(This is contingent on me being able to come, though.)
I wanted to ask whether there are other relay operators who are planning to go,
and which times would work; I made a quick poll to this effect :
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 10:20:31PM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
> Hi !
>
> (Sorry for the late announcement, I somehow forgot to fire off the email...)
>
> The Tor relays operators meetup, at 34C4, will be TOMORROW (day 1),
> from 18.30 to 20.10, in lecture room 11
Hi !
(Sorry for the late announcement, I somehow forgot to fire off the email...)
The Tor relays operators meetup, at 34C4, will be TOMORROW (day 1),
from 18.30 to 20.10, in lecture room 11 (in CCL, 2nd floor) :
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:05:28PM +0100, i...@artikel5ev.de wrote:
> [...]
> It would be great to have a little bigger room than last year.
Yes, there was a bit of a mix-up last year, so we had to make to with
the rooms that were still available.
Best,
nicoo
signature.asc
Description: PGP
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 10:46:59PM +0100, Artikel 5 e.V. wrote:
> Hello,
> when I looked around in the wiki for this years Chaos Communication
> Congress in Leipzig (Germany) I found that there is not much happening
> around Tor.
I will facilitate again the Tor Relays operators meetup, like
On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 08:56:04AM -0500, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 02:37:19PM +0100, fatal wrote:
> > And will there be a tor relay operators meetup?
>
> [...]
> I think there is no separate relay operators meeting, so relay
> operators are welcome in this workshop space
On 01/10/2013 03:34, The Doctor wrote:
That reminds me of a question I've been meaning to ask lately...
Has anyone tried running Tor on top of OSv (http://osv.io/)?
As I understand it, OSv is an ultra-small OS which is Linux
API-compatible and designed for running a single app only atop a
tor-dev seems like a more logical choice, yes.
2012/8/6 Jordi Espasa Clofent jespa...@minibofh.org:
Should I use another tor mail-list (ex. dev) for this question?
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
2012/8/1 Roger Dingledine a...@mit.edu:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:21:01AM +0100, mick wrote:
Question for tor developers. How hard would it be to change the logic
(and syntax) of exit policy in tor to allow domain based formulations
like:
reject *.gmail.com
reject *aol.com
Very hard.
2012/7/31 grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com:
I've thought about constructing iptables rules to limit the number of
SYN packets for the same host per second or such
Multiple flows to the same host don't really bother routers of any class.
Old routers choke when looking up many hosts in the routing
14 matches
Mail list logo
