Does Tor Weather work with bridges? I have 2 bridges that have been operating
for years and it says the fingerprints do not match any relays.
I have been using Uptime Robot, but it would be cool to use Tor Weather.
On Sunday, February 4th, 2024 at 21:33, mail--- via tor-relays
wrote:
> Hi,
>
I grab the binary from Sid.
On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 02:54, ilf <[i...@zeromail.org](mailto:On Sat, Nov 25,
2023 at 02:54, ilf < wrote:
> What's the recommended way to run 0.4.8.9 on armhf Raspberry Pi?
>
> Raspbian only has 0.4.7.13 in bookworm, there is no -security or
> -backports repository:
I have been wondering the last few days about the use of bridges in Russia. Are you more likely to help out the Russian population by running the bridge from a Russian data center? I’m considering if I want to pay for a VPS as well, but not sure how effective this may be with the so-called
I work for a bank and was informed that when I connect to my employer network,
it shows I am coming from a Tor IP and sets off an alert that then leads to me
being on a call with an investigative team for my employers. I was running a
Tor relay, but had to shut it down because of these alerts.
, Alexander Dietrich
wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
> the Tor network is still mostly IPv4
> (https://metrics.torproject.org/relays-ipv6.html), so I would say it's ok to
> turn IPv6 off on your relay for now, especially if there's a problem with
> stability.
>
> Kind regards,
> Alexand
I have IPv6 with my ISP, but there seems to be a bug in the firmware of my
networking equipment that causes IPv6 to stop working periodically and I have
to take my network down and bring it back up. If I do not do this, my relay
stops functioning as I have torrc configured to use IPv6 and IPv4.
17CC4D25E33993D011CDA6E68806435FFFD2E6C7
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, July 10, 2020 3:02 PM, Bakullama wrote:
> 90B64F9E18B59AF322EBD28B8F8CD65C53E10CE1
>
> ~ Bakullama
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Friday, 10 July 2020 13:00,
Thanks! I’m a newbie and did not think you could use the same port for both in
the configuration, but it does make sense networking wise. I have update my
configuration and restarted the service.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 10:29, wrote:
> On 31.05.2020 05:56, Josh Lawson wrote:
>> I
I currently have my IPv6 connection running on port 9001. From an
anti-surveillance perspective, would I be better changing the port to 80? I
have IPv4 running on 443. I appreciate it!___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> Pulse Servers seems to fit that criteria. I don't remember what container
> they use
> though.
looks like:
- OVH reseller (AS16276)
- OpenVZ based VMs
https://lowendbox.com/blog/pulse-servers-7month-1gb-vps-in-canada-with-linux-openvz-or-windows/
> > > Can you add your findings to
> > > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/GoodBadISPs ?
> >
> > I do not know what their policies on tor relays are, that is why I can
> > not really add anything new to that site.
>
> It'a always a good idea to ask.
I don't think it is worth
> Can you add your findings to
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/GoodBadISPs ?
I do not know what their policies on tor relays are, that is why I can not
really add anything new to that site.
___
tor-relays mailing list
Hello!
I'm spending quite some time in finding new cost-efficient VPS hoster in
"unpopular" countries (non-exit).
The relay community would actually have a lot information to provide in that
regard - I think.
I would really appreciate if you can share any hoster that provides VPSes with
On 8 Jul 2015, at 04:56, Zack Weinberg za...@cmu.edu wrote:
I may have gotten this project mixed up with the one that is replacing
Atlas/Onionoo, for which a dashboard showing the relay's status at
the present time is the entry point. Still, I think that an
investigator might indeed want to
On 7 Jul 2015, at 07:48, Karsten Loesing kars...@torproject.org wrote:
On 07/07/15 03:45, teor wrote:
On 7 Jul 2015, at 09:46 , josh@tucker.wales wrote:
From the perspective of someone investigating abuse, I think
it's important that 'not an exit relay' means 'not capable of
exiting
For c), we'd just check if there's a p reject 1-65535 line or not.
I think this is a perfectly OK way of doing this considering the use case.
I agree, as long as we document what Exit means, and that there are edge
cases where a relay could be used to exit to a small number of IPs, yet
From the perspective of someone investigating abuse, I think it's
important that 'not an exit relay' means 'not capable of exiting on any
port at all'. Ergo I think your option c) is the way to go.
I also think this (c) is the best option. I agree that it's important to be
able to determine,
Hi Matt,
Which relays are you have issues with?
Kind Regards,
Joshua Lee Tucker
@tuckerwales
http://tucker.wales
On 6 Jul 2015, at 19:41, Speak Freely when2plus2...@riseup.net wrote:
Starlight,
I created this relay on Friday, shortly after you told me to be patient.
I would put the risk about the same. In certain respects it seems more
devious to use a compromised node than it does to create your own to do
bad stuff.
On 07/22/2014 01:38 AM, Andreas Krey wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 17:28:42 +, Josh wrote:
...
There are exploits that do not require any
I don't know the answer to your question and I am sorry that you are
having this issue. That said even if you are not doing anything besides
running a relay it is a security risk to be running a tor node on
Windows XP.
There are exploits that do not require any interaction from the user.
The
You may be able to increase the ip_conntrack_max on your router. I had
a terrible verizon dsl router that would have its connection tracking
capacity exhausted by pings to games servers. I was able to partially
resolve the problem my telnetting (yea I know) into the router and
setting the
their services and contact them directly with any questions
you have. If you do decide to use them, I would greatly appreciate you using my
affiliate link. It helps me keep the bills paid _.
But if you feel that it's a false incentive, you in no way have to.
http://www.securedservers.com/396.html
Josh
Excuse me, as I'm rather new to mailing lists an the sort, but I've been
tailing the conversation on and off the last few days.
I'm currently using Secured Servers through PheonixNAP as my dedicated
provider. I've used them for roughly a year now and have had no real
problems. They are
23 matches
Mail list logo
