Re: [tor-relays] FW: What's a "useful" mailing list contributor? (was Re: What's a "useful" relay?)

2017-01-16 Thread Kenneth Freeman
Tor could use an Eternal September. On 01/16/2017 10:11 PM, grarpamp wrote: > I would support Rana's volunteer proposal as described, > and growing integration, as being a beneficial contribution. > Let us not forget, all begin as noobs to a norm, and full > normalization may be chilling to

Re: [tor-relays] FW: What's a "useful" mailing list contributor? (was Re: What's a "useful" relay?)

2017-01-16 Thread grarpamp
I would support Rana's volunteer proposal as described, and growing integration, as being a beneficial contribution. Let us not forget, all begin as noobs to a norm, and full normalization may be chilling to diversity. ___ tor-relays mailing list

Re: [tor-relays] FW: What's a "useful" mailing list contributor? (was Re: What's a "useful" relay?)

2017-01-10 Thread Dave Warren
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017, at 21:09, Rana wrote: > Wow. I offer to maintain a FAQ for small relays and in return I get this. > Unsubscribed. While the FAQ could have been useful, if being asked to learn how to post properly on a mailing list causes an instant flameout, I wonder whether the FAQ would

Re: [tor-relays] FW: What's a "useful" mailing list contributor? (was Re: What's a "useful" relay?)

2017-01-10 Thread Roman Mamedov
On Wed, 11 Jan 2017 07:09:27 +0200 "Rana" wrote: > Wow. I offer to maintain a FAQ for small relays and in return I get this. > Unsubscribed. Those were all reasonable requests laid out in a clear and polite fashion. If you don't want to follow etiquette of a community,

[tor-relays] FW: What's a "useful" mailing list contributor? (was Re: What's a "useful" relay?)

2017-01-10 Thread Rana
Wow. I offer to maintain a FAQ for small relays and in return I get this. Unsubscribed. On 3 Jan 2017, at 17:57, Rana > wrote: @teor I hereby volunteer to maintain a FAQ for operators of small relays (or noob operators). Which means