Re: [tor-relays] LLC vis-à-vis Nonprofit

2016-12-03 Thread Kenneth Freeman
On 10/27/2016 05:17 PM, Kenneth Freeman wrote: > > > On 10/26/2016 06:58 PM, Nicholas Merrill wrote: > >> Hi Kenneth >> >> I am with a New York state non-profit organization that runs a number of >> exits. I am not a lawyer, but I have surely spent years discussing >> these and other related

Re: [tor-relays] LLC vis-à-vis Nonprofit

2016-10-27 Thread Kenneth Freeman
On 10/26/2016 06:58 PM, Nicholas Merrill wrote: > Hi Kenneth > > I am with a New York state non-profit organization that runs a number of > exits. I am not a lawyer, but I have surely spent years discussing > these and other related issues with many lawyers. Good to know. Keeps me and my

Re: [tor-relays] LLC vis-à-vis Nonprofit

2016-10-27 Thread Moritz Bartl
On 10/27/2016 02:22 AM, Kenneth Freeman wrote: > An Idaho nonprofit has expressed guarded interest in Tor. Ideally I'd > like them to run an exit node without fuss or bother, but the Tor > Project's Tips on Running an Exit Node only covers limited liability > corporations (LLCs) Which guide is

Re: [tor-relays] LLC vis-à-vis Nonprofit

2016-10-26 Thread Nicholas Merrill
On 10/26/16 8:22 PM, Kenneth Freeman wrote: > An Idaho nonprofit has expressed guarded interest in Tor. Ideally I'd > like them to run an exit node without fuss or bother, but the Tor > Project's Tips on Running an Exit Node only covers limited liability > corporations (LLCs) regarding the

[tor-relays] LLC vis-à-vis Nonprofit

2016-10-26 Thread Kenneth Freeman
An Idaho nonprofit has expressed guarded interest in Tor. Ideally I'd like them to run an exit node without fuss or bother, but the Tor Project's Tips on Running an Exit Node only covers limited liability corporations (LLCs) regarding the legal/corporate set-up. Is there anything to add, or is