Re: [tor-relays] Sanity check on NumCPUs

2022-05-30 Thread dlugasny via tor-relays
Hi, for relays with connection faster than 100Mbit I suggest to use minimum 4 cores and 6-8GB Ram. Cheers Dlugasny Wysłano z bezpiecznej poczty e-mail Proton Mail. --- Original Message --- środa, 25 maja 2022 8:31 PM, Thoughts napisał(a): > For a non-exit relay, is "NumCPUs 2"

Re: [tor-relays] Sanity check on NumCPUs

2022-05-29 Thread Scott Bennett
Roger Dingledine wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 07:31:41PM -0500, Thoughts wrote: > > For a non-exit relay, is "NumCPUs 2" still the recommended maximum??? > > Running on a quad core and recently saw a message indicating I had > > insufficient CPU power to support the desired number of

Re: [tor-relays] Sanity check on NumCPUs

2022-05-29 Thread Roman Mamedov
On Fri, 27 May 2022 13:11:06 -0500 Thoughts wrote: > It was my impression from reading some older documents that tor didn't > multithread well. Indeed it does not. But there's no need to hard-cap it to 2 CPUs via config, unless the plan is that multi-instance scenario with 2 cores per

Re: [tor-relays] Sanity check on NumCPUs

2022-05-29 Thread Thoughts
It was my impression from reading some older documents that tor didn't multithread well.  Its also been my observation, but wanted a sanity check to see if that was still the case.  For instance, on one quad core low-power system I had, tor would max out at 28% of CPU - using 100% of one core

Re: [tor-relays] Sanity check on NumCPUs

2022-05-29 Thread Roman Mamedov
On Wed, 25 May 2022 19:31:41 -0500 Thoughts wrote: > For a non-exit relay, is "NumCPUs 2" still the recommended maximum?   > Running on a quad core and recently saw a message indicating I had > insufficient CPU power to support the desired number of connections... I'm not sure why would it be

Re: [tor-relays] Sanity check on NumCPUs

2022-05-27 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 07:31:41PM -0500, Thoughts wrote: > For a non-exit relay, is "NumCPUs 2" still the recommended maximum?   > Running on a quad core and recently saw a message indicating I had > insufficient CPU power to support the desired number of connections... I would suggest leaving

Re: [tor-relays] Sanity check on NumCPUs

2022-05-27 Thread lists
On Thursday, May 26, 2022 2:31:41 AM CEST Thoughts wrote: > For a non-exit relay, is "NumCPUs 2" still the recommended maximum? > Running on a quad core and recently saw a message indicating I had > insufficient CPU power to support the desired number of connections... > NumCPU I always let the

[tor-relays] Sanity check on NumCPUs

2022-05-27 Thread Thoughts
For a non-exit relay, is "NumCPUs 2" still the recommended maximum?   Running on a quad core and recently saw a message indicating I had insufficient CPU power to support the desired number of connections... Thanks, Kevin ___ tor-relays mailing