Re: [tor-relays] Unbelieveable

> > Check your firewall, and gateway port forwards if the server is > > behind a NAT. If you're not sure where to start, post the output of > > "sudo iptables -L" > > > > --Sean > > > I've made several iptables and saved them, I thought, however every > time I reboot the VPS all my rules are

Re: [tor-relays] Unbelieveable

On 12/04/15 00:07, I wrote: > I thought I was joining a loose but passionate, clever and idealistic > community. > I thought I would learn just being a listener and building my knowledge of > security and servers. disappointments result from expectations. i have learned some things by reading

Re: [tor-relays] Unbelieveable

On 12/03/2015 10:09 PM, Michael McConville wrote: > Kurt Besig wrote: >> Well. even a doctor would make a few suggestions based on some sort of >> experience based reasoning. Perhaps some connection problems >> associated with running tor-arm on a VPS vs. a home server...things of >> that

Re: [tor-relays] Unbelieveable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/4/2015 8:25 PM, Damian Johnson wrote: > For what it's worth process permissions aren't at play here. Arm > is failing to talk with the control port - permissions could cause > us to be unable to read the authentication cookie, but that would >

Re: [tor-relays] Unbelieveable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/5/2015 3:20 PM, Sean Greenslade wrote: >>> Dec 05 21:17:46.000 [notice] Your IP address seems to have >>> changed to 167.114.35.28 (METHOD=INTERFACE). Updating. Dec 05 >>> 21:17:46.000 [notice] Our IP Address has changed from >>> 142.4.217.95 to

Re: [tor-relays] Unbelieveable

Just build new torrc, that fixed my issue. cd /etc/tor/ cp torrc torrc.bak touch torrc Use this for torrc (nano torrc), replace some info to match your relay http://0bin.net/paste/tdUuzTHwZI-BRWQy#JPmufzd+g0W0cx0WyB4g0iU12jU0WFpZRWtKVg6iDbS When you are done: sevice tor restart Then, sudo

Re: [tor-relays] Unbelieveable

Looks like you got more than you paid for. On 2015-12-03 18:46, Kurt Besig wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > That I got two responses after posting to tor-relays regarding a > fairly simple, I thought, CntrolPort question on a new VPS relay.. > That's pathetic.

Re: [tor-relays] Unbelieveable

On Fri, 04 Dec 2015 09:29:58 -0800 AMuse allegedly wrote: > > > Looks like you got more than you paid for. > > On 2015-12-03 18:46, Kurt Besig wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > That I got two responses after posting to tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Unbelieveable

  Am Freitag, 4. Dezember 2015 08:57 schrieb Josef 'veloc1ty' Stautner :   Have you restarted Tor after you made changes?   Yes. After ive done changes i always restart the Server hard. Tor is Running As Daemon so hours after restart i just do a check at

Re: [tor-relays] Unbelieveable

Are you aware that you just wrote "write that sort of retort privately" by not, yourself, writing your retort privately? As to why I published my original reply to the list, it's because I felt that other lurkers who are perhaps newbies to how open source support listservs work might also

Re: [tor-relays] Unbelieveable

write that sort of retort privately  -Original Message-From: tor-am...@foofus.comSent: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 10:33:03 -0800To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.orgSubject: Re: [tor-relays] Unbelieveable Believe it or not, Kurt, if you'd asked in your follow-up in anything resembling a nice

Re: [tor-relays] Unbelieveable

David Schulz wrote: > Am 04.12.2015 20:12, schrieb Michael McConville: > >I suspect you're also getting few replies because relatively few > >experienced relay operators use arm. That's only a guess, but I found > >arm a needless, breakable complication after the rush of running my > >first relay

Re: [tor-relays] Unbelieveable

Michael McConville wrote: > David Schulz wrote: > > Am 04.12.2015 20:12, schrieb Michael McConville: > > >I suspect you're also getting few replies because relatively few > > >experienced relay operators use arm. That's only a guess, but I > > >found arm a needless, breakable complication after

Re: [tor-relays] Unbelieveable

 No worries,Are you sure the user or group is debian_tor?The default is debian-tor in Ubuntu.If that isn't the problem,First I would be sure tor is actually running.toportop -u debian-torThe second will show if tor is actually running as the user you think it is.If it is, then see if it is

Re: [tor-relays] Unbelieveable

For what it's worth process permissions aren't at play here. Arm is failing to talk with the control port - permissions could cause us to be unable to read the authentication cookie, but that would be a different message. Cheers! -Damian On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Manager Bahia del Sol LLC

Re: [tor-relays] Unbelieveable

Believe it or not, Kurt, if you'd asked in your follow-up in anything resembling a nice or appreciative tone, I'd have helped you. I'm on too many email lists and things get buried sometimes, so I didn't see any of your original requests. I had a few minutes today where I could have chatted

Re: [tor-relays] Unbelieveable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/4/2015 9:29 AM, AMuse wrote: > Looks like you got more than you paid for. > > > > On 2015-12-03 18:46, Kurt Besig wrote: > > That I got two responses after posting to tor-relays regarding a > fairly simple, I thought, CntrolPort question on

Re: [tor-relays] Unbelieveable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/4/2015 10:33 AM, AMuse wrote: > Believe it or not, Kurt, if you'd asked in your follow-up in > anything resembling a nice or appreciative tone, I'd have helped > you. I'm on too many email lists and things get buried sometimes, > so I didn't

Re: [tor-relays] Unbelieveable

He is right. Do you want help now or what? Am 04.12.2015 um 19:21 schrieb Kurt Besig: > On 12/4/2015 9:29 AM, AMuse wrote: > > Looks like you got more than you paid for. > > > > > On 2015-12-03 18:46, Kurt Besig wrote: > > > That I got two responses after posting to tor-relays regarding a > >

Re: [tor-relays] Unbelieveable

I suspect you're also getting few replies because relatively few experienced relay operators use arm. That's only a guess, but I found arm a needless, breakable complication after the rush of running my first relay wore off. It is fun to use and useful to beginners, though. :-) No disrespect to

Re: [tor-relays] Unbelieveable

Do you got an alternative for arm? i use munin too, for connections etc. Am 04.12.2015 20:12, schrieb Michael McConville: I suspect you're also getting few replies because relatively few experienced relay operators use arm. That's only a guess, but I found arm a needless, breakable complication

Re: [tor-relays] Unbelieveable

On Fri, 04 Dec 2015 20:15:18 +0100 David Schulz wrote: > Do you got an alternative for arm? i use munin too, for connections etc. "For connections"? Why do you ever need to view the actual connections from/to your relay. As alternatives to arm, when looking after a relay that's

Re: [tor-relays] Unbelieveable

Hi, It's difficult to nail down without any actual information to go on. It's sort of like saying "my back hurts" and asking people what may have caused it to hurt. You'll get a few random answers, at best. -k0nsl Den 12/4/2015 kl. 3:46 AM, skrev Kurt Besig: > That I got two responses after

Re: [tor-relays] Unbelieveable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/3/2015 7:11 PM, k0nsl wrote: > Hi, It's difficult to nail down without any actual information to > go on. It's sort of like saying "my back hurts" and asking people > what may have caused it to hurt. You'll get a few random answers, > at

Re: [tor-relays] Unbelieveable

Yeah I see the probleme: Your didn't provide any Config extract nor logs nor other stuff like that. Provide your config to see if you made an unix socket or a network socket or if you set any password. If you set up a network listener please provide netstat output. Maybe a dumb question: Have you

Re: [tor-relays] Unbelieveable

Kurt Besig wrote: > Well. even a doctor would make a few suggestions based on some sort of > experience based reasoning. Perhaps some connection problems > associated with running tor-arm on a VPS vs. a home server...things of > that nature. Also I was just wondering as I don't see many of the >

[tor-relays] Unbelieveable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 That I got two responses after posting to tor-relays regarding a fairly simple, I thought, CntrolPort question on a new VPS relay.. That's pathetic. Thanks for all your input. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)