Your "draft" looks very good. I'm sure, that it will help.
Thanks a lot
On 26.10.2016 02:01, Mirimir wrote:
> On 10/25/2016 05:40 PM, teor wrote:
>>
>>> On 26 Oct. 2016, at 10:31, Mirimir wrote:
>>>
Any particular reason to let the mailing list know you have useful
> On 26 Oct. 2016, at 10:31, Mirimir wrote:
>
>> Any particular reason to let the mailing list know you have useful
>> information but not share it here and make it available for future
>> list archive searches? ;-)
>
> I'm assuming that the list doesn't accept attachments
On 10/25/2016 03:39 AM, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> On 25.10.2016 09:58, Mirimir wrote:
>
>> OK, I've emailed you.
>
> Any particular reason to let the mailing list know you have useful
> information but not share it here and make it available for future
> list archive searches? ;-)
I'm assuming
I am interested too.
It would be nice, if you can share it.
Thanks a lot
On 25.10.2016 08:49, Petrusko wrote:
> Absolutely interested ! with pleasure :)
> Will it be a link, or a file...? if you prefer sending it directly to
> this mail address...
>
> Thx in advance ;)
>
>
> Mirimir :
>> I
Right, it's so easy and quick to duplicate a SD card with this hardware,
by only unplugging it from the board... If it's not stored under your
bed, it can be useful :p
And 2nd, it can be a cool challenge to make it working ? To understand
how those security softwares and how to config them nicely
> On 25 Oct. 2016, at 21:16, Toralf Förster wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 10/25/2016 12:03 PM, Duncan Guthrie wrote:
>>
>> Having it encrypted also makes remote management an absolute pain.
> Depends on - an encrypted ext4fs needs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/25/2016 12:03 PM, Duncan Guthrie wrote:
>
> Having it encrypted also makes remote management an absolute pain.
Depends on - an encrypted ext4fs needs just to be decrypted after boot as I
tried in [1].
And the use case is to avoid that the
Hi folks,
I am not sure it is more secure. What are we trying to protect here? As long as
the relay is running,it is unencrypted. Disk encryption only prevents physical
access - are you at risk of this? At any rate, the relay shouldn't be storing
personal data.
Having it encrypted also
On 25.10.2016 09:58, Mirimir wrote:
> OK, I've emailed you.
Any particular reason to let the mailing list know you have useful
information but not share it here and make it available for future
list archive searches? ;-)
-Ralph
___
tor-relays mailing
On 10/25/2016 12:49 AM, Petrusko wrote:
> Absolutely interested ! with pleasure :)
> Will it be a link, or a file...? if you prefer sending it directly to
> this mail address...
>
> Thx in advance ;)
OK, I've emailed you.
> Mirimir :
>> I have a how-to guide, if you're interested.
>
>
>
>
Absolutely interested ! with pleasure :)
Will it be a link, or a file...? if you prefer sending it directly to
this mail address...
Thx in advance ;)
Mirimir :
> I have a how-to guide, if you're interested.
--
Petrusko
EBE23AE5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 10/24/2016 04:04 PM, Petrusko wrote:
> Many thx for your contribution, thx to you 2 :)
>
> I was thinking too about the full disk encryption.
> No problem to backup/restore current files.
>
> Sadly Raspbian, and many others OS for the RPi, have not many options
> like x86 when you set up the
Many thx for your contribution, thx to you 2 :)
I was thinking too about the full disk encryption.
No problem to backup/restore current files.
Sadly Raspbian, and many others OS for the RPi, have not many options
like x86 when you set up the system. That's why it can be hard to
understand how to
On 24.10.2016 09:53, Petrusko wrote:
> Any suggestions and master's thoughts are welcome :)
:-)
Yes, why not use a full disk encryption? You could encrypt the root
partition. I know, it's harder to do this on a running system and
Raspbian doesn't offer you encryption within setup. The best
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/24/2016 09:53 AM, Petrusko wrote:
> Any suggestions and master's thoughts are welcome :)
I played few weeks ago with folder based encryption at an EXT4FS, but gave up -
it won't work reliable here (hardened stable Gentoo Linux).
But maybe
Hey all,
I'm planning to customise a RPi with Raspbian already running, and using
cryptsetup (LUKS) to have a partition more secure for some reasons...
So the goal is to move some existing sensitive folders to this new
encrypted partition.
Some sym-links will be used for those directories.
About
16 matches
Mail list logo