I feel like you are SO missing the point.
Making Tor block morally horrible things does not involve telling exit
notes to block traffic to known porn sites.
The porn sites with the boobies that someone might hit on port 80 on
the public internet represent the Catholic Church of porn,
I'm not sure if this applies but -
[1]http://thenextweb.com/asia/2013/08/01/vietnam-adopts-regulations-to-
ban-internet-users-from-sharing-news-reports-online/
Sustain
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013, at 05:43 PM, Jon Gardner wrote:
On Aug 28, 2013, at 5:09 PM, Roger Dingledine a...@mit.edu wrote:
This is why we need to implement extended exit flags for exits that want
to run post-exit filtering/enhancement policies, say for example
noporn
that way we can get all the religious groups dumping their tithes into
not just beaming reruns of the 700 club around the world, but a pile of
On 08/30/2013 08:05 PM, Andrea Shepard wrote:
[snip]
If I were going to work on filtering by technical means, it'd be filters to
keep neo-Puritans like you out of my life, thanks.
Well said. This whole thread is example 87653478965432 of the
censorship is A-OK if I don't like it mindset.
This thread did go goofy and bad (and off-topic, given the subject in
the emails). It seems clear that there are important reasons Tor could
never begin examining/taking direct responsibility for/filtering the
content that flows through it (as opposed with disallowing specific
ports, which is
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 07:22:16 +0200
Andreas Krey a.k...@gmx.de allegedly wrote:
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 23:12:01 +, Tor Exit wrote:
GET /index.php?file=../../../../../../../etc/passwd
Why not employ similar techniques on a Tor exit? We can be 100%
sure about the malicious intent.
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:34:13 -0700
Andy Isaacson a...@hexapodia.org allegedly wrote:
If only there were a separate TCP port for HTTP-with-Porn and all the
pornographers used it, then an exit policy for HTTP-without-porn
would be possible. But alas, we don't even have vague agreement on
HTTP-without-porn should be called BurkaHTTP. I'm sure there's a backronym
that will fit…
On Aug 28, 2013 4:15 AM, mick m...@rlogin.net wrote:
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:34:13 -0700
Andy Isaacson a...@hexapodia.org allegedly wrote:
If only there were a separate TCP port for HTTP-with-Porn and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/27/2013 05:12 PM, Tor Exit wrote:
Why is it so bad if a Tor exit operator tries to match the use of
their node with their own moral beliefs?
Exercising one's moral beliefs can censor others. It would make it
implicitly okay for exit node
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:12:01PM +0200, Tor Exit wrote:
Why is it so bad if a Tor exit operator tries to match the use of
their node with their own moral beliefs?
I really would like to support this if I could.
Specifically, I'd love a way for exit relay operators to only allow
people to do
On Aug 22, 2013, at 11:56 AM, mick m...@rlogin.net wrote:
The other thing that I am weighing is just a moral question regarding
misuse of the Tor network for despicable things like child porn. I
understand that of all the traffic it is a small percentage and that
ISPs essentially face the
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:08:34 +, Jon Gardner wrote:
...
Then why have exit policies?
To keep spammers at bay (or getting your exit blacklisted);
to keep traffic at bay (bittorrent), to keep law harrassment
at bay (again bittorrent, others as well).
Exit nodes regularly block unwelcome
On 08/28/2013 12:08 AM, Jon Gardner wrote:
Then why have exit policies? Exit nodes regularly block unwelcome traffic
like bittorrent, and there's only a slight functional difference between that
and using a filter in front of the node to block things like porn (which,
come to think of it,
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:08:34 -0500
Jon Gardner j...@brazoslink.net allegedly wrote:
On Aug 22, 2013, at 11:56 AM, mick m...@rlogin.net wrote:
Tor is neutral. You and I may agree that certain usage is unwelcome,
even abhorrent, but we cannot dictate how others may use an
anonymising
The Tor devs go to great lengths to try to keep evil governments from
using Tor against itself. Why not devote some effort toward keeping evil
traffic off of Tor?
I agree. Why not block the most obvious abuse? All professional Apache
webservers install a module named 'mod_secure' that will
On 13-08-27 05:12 PM, Tor Exit wrote:
The Tor devs go to great lengths to try to keep evil governments from
using Tor against itself. Why not devote some effort toward keeping evil
traffic off of Tor?
I agree. Why not block the most obvious abuse? All professional Apache
webservers
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:08:34AM -0500, Jon Gardner wrote:
Then why have exit policies? Exit nodes regularly block unwelcome
traffic like bittorrent, and there's only a slight functional
difference between that and using a filter in front of the node to
block things like porn
The exit
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 23:12:01 +, Tor Exit wrote:
GET /index.php?file=../../../../../../../etc/passwd
Why not employ similar techniques on a Tor exit? We can be 100% sure about
the malicious intent.
No, you can't be sure. That request could quite well be totally legitimate;
you are not
You cannot make Tor resistant to evil usage. Evil usage is defined
by your personal morals on one level, and by governments via the laws
the enact and prosecute on the other level.
Tor's raison d'etre is to allow people to use the internet freely when
their personal morals and their government's
Am 2013-08-22 17:28, schrieb Lukas Erlacher:
You could put a censoring proxy in front of your exit node. But that
would defeat the purpose of Tor entirely...
... and will eventually lead to your relay being flagged as a bad exit node.
Tampering with exit traffic is strongly discouraged [1].
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 08:45:33 -0500
a432511 a432...@mail49.org allegedly wrote:
I just spun up 2 relays (1 exit, 1 non-exit) in Amsterdam using
DigitalOcean as the VPS provider. It's been up for about 8 hours now.
Here was the message I sent to them regarding the servers:
I have three
On 22.08.2013 15:45, a432511 wrote:
I just spun up 2 relays (1 exit, 1 non-exit) in Amsterdam using
DigitalOcean as the VPS provider. It's been up for about 8 hours now.
Thank you and good luck!
While in the
future there may be a precedent that grants safe-harbor status to TOR
exit nodes,
: Thursday, August 22, 2013 1:02:12 PM
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] new relays
On 22.08.2013 15:45, a432511 wrote:
I just spun up 2 relays (1 exit, 1 non-exit) in Amsterdam using
DigitalOcean as the VPS provider. It's been up for about 8 hours now.
Thank you and good luck!
While in the
future
23 matches
Mail list logo
