Re: [tor-relays] Just got my first Abuse email :-)

2017-10-12 Thread Dr Gerard Bulger
So far I have had no abuse emails or complaints after two months on a new server, using the longer suggested reduced policy list, but I do exclude 80, which seems safer but limits the role as an exit. But 443 open. I closed other potential abuse ports such as 22, 8080, 5900. It's not the

Re: [tor-relays] Revert back to a stable build of Tor from an alpha

2017-10-12 Thread nusenu
nusenu: > Jacki M: >> How do I revert back to a stable build of Tor from an alpha? Im running Tor >> 0.3.2.2-alpha and need to revert back to Tor 0.3.1.7. >> Im running Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS. > > this should be easy: > > apt remove tor > adjust sources.list to point to the stable repository

Re: [tor-relays] Revert back to a stable build of Tor from an alpha

2017-10-12 Thread Lucas Werkmeister
On 12.10.2017 11:57, nusenu wrote: > > nusenu: >> Jacki M: >>> How do I revert back to a stable build of Tor from an alpha? Im running Tor >>> 0.3.2.2-alpha and need to revert back to Tor 0.3.1.7. >>> Im running Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS. >> this should be easy: >> >> apt remove tor >> adjust

Re: [tor-relays] Revert back to a stable build of Tor from an alpha

2017-10-12 Thread nusenu
Jacki M: > How do I revert back to a stable build of Tor from an alpha? Im running Tor > 0.3.2.2-alpha and need to revert back to Tor 0.3.1.7. > Im running Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS. this should be easy: apt remove tor adjust sources.list to point to the stable repository (remove the experimental

Re: [tor-relays] Just got my first Abuse email :-)

2017-10-12 Thread Cristian Consonni
Hi Paul, On 11/10/2017 13:28, Paul Templeton wrote: >> I believe in such case you are supposed to reply to your provider > I will For my experience, I do the same. >> There was a mini discussion recently on that, with the general consensus >> seeming to be that keeping it open is more trouble

Re: [tor-relays] spurios warning about using the nickname instead of the key

2017-10-12 Thread teor
> On 12 Oct 2017, at 13:21, Toralf Förster wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > >> On 10/11/2017 10:08 AM, Dylan Issa wrote: >> Did you set MyFamily using nicknames of the key? >> Because if nickname, change it to key is basically what it’s

Re: [tor-relays] spurios warning about using the nickname instead of the key

2017-10-12 Thread Scott Bennett
teor wrote: > > > On 12 Oct 2017, at 13:21, Toralf F?rster wrote: > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > >> On 10/11/2017 10:08 AM, Dylan Issa wrote: > >> Did you set MyFamily using nicknames of the key? > >> Because if

Re: [tor-relays] spurios warning about using the nickname instead of the key

2017-10-12 Thread Sebastian Hahn
Hi there, > On 12. Oct 2017, at 20:43, Scott Bennett wrote: > teor wrote: >>> On 12 Oct 2017, at 13:21, Toralf F?rster wrote: >>> >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash: SHA256 >>> On 10/11/2017 10:08 AM, Dylan Issa

Re: [tor-relays] spurios warning about using the nickname instead of the key

2017-10-12 Thread Toralf Förster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 10/12/2017 08:43 PM, Scott Bennett wrote: > Doessn't each fingerprint need to start with a $ character? Otherwise > it's just a really long nickname, right? That entry worked fine for eons and is realized fine, eg.:

Re: [tor-relays] spurios warning about using the nickname instead of the key

2017-10-12 Thread Dylan Issa
Maybe they're truncated, but they still need to start with a $On 12 October 2017 at 20:09 Sebastian Hahn wrote:Hi there,On 12. Oct 2017, at 20:43, Scott Bennett wrote:teor wrote:On 12 Oct 2017, at 13:21, Toralf F?rster

Re: [tor-relays] spurios warning about using the nickname instead of the key

2017-10-12 Thread Roman Mamedov
On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 21:01:55 +0100 (BST) Dylan Issa wrote: > Maybe they're truncated, but they still need to start with a $ If you would just read the manual page, you would gather that $ is optional. > > On 12 October 2017 at 20:09 Sebastian Hahn