Re: [tor-relays] Question about downtime

2018-01-21 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 03:52:27AM -0600, Conrad Rockenhaus wrote: > Anyway, I had a quick question, on the relay side I run ConradsOVHRelay01 > (Relay) and ConradsOVHRelay02 (Exit). They???re running on CentOS, so I have > to manually install the latest version of tor to keep up with the

[tor-relays] Question about downtime

2018-01-21 Thread Conrad Rockenhaus
Hello, Note - to others that have sent me emails about a proposed project, I will respond, I’m sorry I just got caught up in a huge emergency project. Anyway, I had a quick question, on the relay side I run ConradsOVHRelay01 (Relay) and ConradsOVHRelay02 (Exit). They’re running on CentOS, so I

Re: [tor-relays] connlimit: better to use "DROP" or "REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset"?

2018-01-21 Thread Toralf Förster
On 01/11/2018 02:10 AM, teor wrote: > So if you're going to do this, please set a much higher limit than 2. > I would suggest at least 4, but 10 or more is better. > > You might be able to set it higher if you put a limit on repeated > connection attempts. The simple approach (allowing 8 syn

Re: [tor-relays] Question about downtime

2018-01-21 Thread nusenu
Conrad Rockenhaus: > They’re running on CentOS, so I have to manually install the latest > version of tor to keep up with the security updates. > > I am considering migrating to Ubuntu or Debian to make the update > process simpler. EPEL repos ship tor 0.2.9.14 - that version should be just

Re: [tor-relays] hidden service performance

2018-01-21 Thread teor
> On 22 Jan 2018, at 05:55, Igor Mitrofanov wrote: > > I'd like to call out the apparent hidden service performance slowdown: > https://metrics.torproject.org/torperf.html?start=2017-04-23=2018-01-21=all=onion=50kb > > I hope the dev team is looking into it. Yes,

Re: [tor-relays] debugging unbound on 'torexit' failing DNS queries (solved)

2018-01-21 Thread nusenu
Quintin: > Ah, thats it. My conntrack entries are full and temporarily increasing it > resolves the problem. I'm glad we found the problem and the solution. Your exit appears to be offline since 2018-01-20 20:00, expected downtime?

Re: [tor-relays] Become a Fallback Directory Mirror

2018-01-21 Thread teor
Hi, > On 22 Jan 2018, at 05:01, Fabian A. Santiago > wrote: > > January 8, 2018 3:29 PM, "Spiros Andreou" wrote: > >> Normalcitizen: E51620B90DCB310138ED89EDEDD0A5C361AAE24E >> >>> Original Message >>> >>> Subject: [tor-relays]

Re: [tor-relays] hidden service performance

2018-01-21 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 10:55:16AM -0800, Igor Mitrofanov wrote: > I'd like to call out the apparent hidden service performance slowdown: > https://metrics.torproject.org/torperf.html?start=2017-04-23=2018-01-21=all=onion=50kb > > I hope the dev team is looking into it. That time frame matches

[tor-relays] hidden service performance

2018-01-21 Thread Igor Mitrofanov
I'd like to call out the apparent hidden service performance slowdown: https://metrics.torproject.org/torperf.html?start=2017-04-23=2018-01-21=all=onion=50kb I hope the dev team is looking into it. Thanks, Igor ___ tor-relays mailing list

[tor-relays] tor on arm vps

2018-01-21 Thread Quintin
I see online.net has a lot of ARM VPSes. Does tor run fine on these? Q -- 01011001010101001101011101000101010010100110 01001100010001010101001101010011001001011001010001010101 ___ tor-relays mailing list

Re: [tor-relays] tor on arm vps

2018-01-21 Thread niftybunny
Slow. Really slow. Get the Intel Atom with scaleway.com Or test it for yourself. They bill per hour and they are dirt cheap. > On 21. Jan 2018, at 20:02, Quintin wrote: > > I see online.net has a lot of ARM VPSes. Does tor run > fine on

Re: [tor-relays] Relays operators meetup @ FOSDEM 2018 ?

2018-01-21 Thread Nicolas Braud-Santoni
Hi again, On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 12:07:43AM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > Hi, > > I might be able to organise a relays operators meetup at FOSDEM, early > February. > (This is contingent on me being able to come, though.) > > I wanted to ask whether there are other relay operators who

Re: [tor-relays] Onionoo bandwidth recording stopped?

2018-01-21 Thread teor
> Gesendet: Samstag, 20. Januar 2018 um 17:06 Uhr > Von: "Iain Learmonth" > An: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > Betreff: Re: [tor-relays] Onionoo bandwidth recording stopped? > Hi, > > On 20/01/18 10:25, Ralph Wetzel wrote: > > As a consequece, I'll consider implementing

Re: [tor-relays] updateFallbackDirs.py issues

2018-01-21 Thread Toralf Förster
On 01/16/2018 11:15 PM, teor wrote: > Hi, > > On 17 Jan 2018, at 08:31, Toralf Förster > wrote: > >> I do wonder why >>    $> scripts/maint/updateFallbackDirs.py check_existing >> tells >>    $>

Re: [tor-relays] updateFallbackDirs.py issues

2018-01-21 Thread teor
>> On 22 Jan 2018, at 04:13, Toralf Förster wrote: >> >> On 01/16/2018 11:15 PM, teor wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 17 Jan 2018, at 08:31, Toralf Förster > > wrote: >> >>> I do wonder why >>>$>

Re: [tor-relays] Become a Fallback Directory Mirror

2018-01-21 Thread Fabian A. Santiago
January 8, 2018 3:29 PM, "Spiros Andreou" wrote: > Normalcitizen: E51620B90DCB310138ED89EDEDD0A5C361AAE24E > >> Original Message >> >> Subject: [tor-relays] Become a Fallback Directory Mirror >> >> Local Time: 21 December 2017 12:50 AM >> >> UTC Time: 20