i am iterrested :-)
have you a ovm or harddiskimage ?
regards Steffen
TorGate
torgate(at)linux-hus.dk
OpenGPG 7FD5 65EF A4EF EEF3 7A13 4372 8409 49D6 01A2 0890
> Am 25.02.2018 um 21:50 schrieb Conrad Rockenhaus :
>
> Hello All,
>
> If anyone is interested, I have a
Conrad Rockenhaus:
> Hello All,
>
> If anyone is interested, I have a RAW image of a FreeBSD 11.1 ZFS image that
> is fully configured and ready to run Tor. Right now it's an eight GB image,
> but
> I'm reducing the size by removing all of the extra stuff on it from the
> upgrade from FreeBSD
On Sunday, February 25, 2018 2:59:38 PM CST TorGate wrote:
> i am iterrested :-)
> have you a ovm or harddiskimage ?
Right now it's a RAW image, but it can be converted to whatever format you
need with QEMU-image... I just converted it to VDI right now to start nuking
the /usr/src stuff.
>
> I tend to think using other people's scripts
> that can be reviewed and hacked is a better gateway for new relay
> operators than images.
+1
--
https://mastodon.social/@nusenu
twitter: @nusenu_
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sunday, February 25, 2018 3:05:00 PM CST George wrote:
> Conrad Rockenhaus:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > If anyone is interested, I have a RAW image of a FreeBSD 11.1 ZFS image
> > that is fully configured and ready to run Tor. Right now it's an eight GB
> > image, but I'm reducing the size by
Hello All,
If anyone is interested, I have a RAW image of a FreeBSD 11.1 ZFS image that
is fully configured and ready to run Tor. Right now it's an eight GB image, but
I'm reducing the size by removing all of the extra stuff on it from the
upgrade from FreeBSD 11 to 11.1.
If you're interested
please ensure the tor keys folder is empty in your image
and SSH hostkeys are also not there (generated on first boot)
--
https://mastodon.social/@nusenu
twitter: @nusenu_
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 4:05 PM, George wrote:
> However, I'd be wary of an image that I didn't build myself, personally.
Yes, especially of image without source [script]
(not to diminish such work).
FreeBSD is largely reproducible these days,
OpenBSD maybe not yet (you'd
On Sunday, February 25, 2018 11:13:12 PM CST grarpamp wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 4:05 PM, George wrote:
> > However, I'd be wary of an image that I didn't build myself, personally.
>
> Yes, especially of image without source [script]
> (not to diminish such work).
>
>
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:21 AM, Conrad Rockenhaus
wrote:
> I'm more than willing to offer source :D, but I'm just going to make it a
> script only project instead based on what seems to be the consensus opinion.
> I'm just going to clean up some small things now that
You're currently not measured, per atlas it's been only 12 hours since this
node has been online. It takes about three days to get a nominal measurement.
I had a node on a 200mbps connection sit at 0bps for two days straight, then
it finally had some movement in the evening of day three. I
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 09:05:00PM +, George wrote:
> Conrad Rockenhaus:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > If anyone is interested, I have a RAW image of a FreeBSD 11.1 ZFS image
> > that
> > is fully configured and ready to run Tor. Right now it's an eight GB image,
> > but
> > I'm reducing the
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 04:03:49PM -0600, Conrad Rockenhaus wrote:
> Wow, I didn't expect my friendly gesture to start another debate, but the
> reasoning behind offering this image was mainly for people who were operating
> on OpenStack clouds who wanted to upload the image to their
On Sunday, February 25, 2018 4:03:30 PM CST Jordan wrote:
> >> Another issue is that OVH is over relied upon for public nodes. It's the
> >> leading ASN with almost 15%.
> >
> > They're one of the few providers out there that allow exits. That's why
> > 15% of our exits are on OVH.
>
> For what
George,
I'm sorry, I didn't take your points as accusatory at all. I apologize if I
came across that way. You had valid points, and after everyone on the mailing
list pouncing me about these points, I can completely understand now that
providing an image for production use is a bad idea. I
Conrad Rockenhaus:
> I'm more than willing to provide the
> ansible scripts I use to initially spin things up
looking forward to it
--
https://mastodon.social/@nusenu
twitter: @nusenu_
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Wow, I didn't expect my friendly gesture to start another debate, but the
reasoning behind offering this image was mainly for people who were operating
on OpenStack clouds who wanted to upload the image to their infrastructure
using glance and start things up quickly. I'm more than willing to
Another issue is that OVH is over relied upon for public nodes. It's the
leading ASN with almost 15%.
They're one of the few providers out there that allow exits. That's why 15% of
our exits are on OVH.
For what it's worth, my entire OVH account was terminated as a result of
hosting an exit
https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/53CDD268FAD52B0236A4E7F4784259A41C6E3414
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On 24 February 2018 5:59 PM, s7r wrote:
> Gabe D. wrote:
>
> > Feb 24 10:45:08.668 \[notice\] Tor 0.3.2.9 (git-64a719dd25a21acb) running
> > on Linux
On 02/24/2018 09:54 PM, Spiros Andreou wrote:
[snip]
> 1) install fail2ban which will block anyone who fails a login 3 times
> 2) move SSH to a non standard port (preferably >1000)
> 3) reconfigure SSH to only allow login with keys instead of passwords -
> generate and successfully test login
20 matches
Mail list logo