Re: [tor-relays] CVE-2015-7547 Tor network stats

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 21:16:42 -0800 Saint Aardvark the Carpeted wrote: > Most libraries aren't so central to everything that runs in Linux, and > restarting the programs that use the library in question is a >

[tor-relays] Relay is missing Running flag in the consensus

Hello, I have a problem with one[1] of my exit relays: about a week ago this relay lost its Running flag, but it was running all the time. I upgraded Tor on this relay to 0.2.9.7-rc from "tor-devel" FreeBSD port and restarted it. Relay was and still is accessible from outside via ports 80 and

[tor-relays] Removal request from fallback directory mirrors list

Hello, Because of latest Digital Ocean billing changes I request to remove relay 774555642FDC1E1D4FDF2E0C31B7CA9501C5C9C7 from fallback directory mirrors list. I will keep it online and updated, but in the long run (year or two) I plan to shutdown it. Thank you all. pgpeDrGqaZTM3.pgp

Re: [tor-relays] How to change Tor's source code

On Tue, 29 May 2018 11:33:46 +0300 "dave` dave" wrote: > I saw that i have this site > https://gitweb.torproject.org/tor-browser.git which have Tor's source > code, i don't understand how it works. i want to change the source > code in my computer, can/how i do that? At the bottom of the page

Re: [tor-relays] MyFamily and ContactInfo fields are required for operators running multiple tor instances

> > MyFamily **must** be set correctly if you run more than one > > relay or bridge. (That is, every relay should list all the others > > as described above.) So if I run some relays and also some bridges I must to specify unhashed fingerprints of the bridges in MyFamily in configs of all

Re: [tor-relays] MyFamily and ContactInfo fields are required for operators running multiple tor instances

On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 21:02:42 +0100 Sebastian Hahn <m...@sebastianhahn.net> wrote: > > On 11. Jan 2018, at 20:44, Dmitrii Tcvetkov <demfl...@demfloro.ru> > > wrote: > >>>MyFamily **must** be set correctly if you run more than one > >>> relay

Re: [tor-relays] issue with setting up a private bridge

On Sun, 4 Feb 2018 09:56:18 +0330 Hamid Safe wrote: > Hello tor-relays team, > > > > I am facing issue trying to set up a private obfs4proxy+tor relay > > bridge(centos 7 server) on a vps outside Iran and using the same > > methodology obfs4+tor client (Arch linux) inside

[tor-relays] greyponyit.com free trial report

Since 25.07.2018 I'm running Tor exit relay BBF17F784433635FA28E7E585D05FE3B15A31A6B on FreeBSD VPS. Although AS16276 is quite crowded, fact that IP address space is SWIPed to Conrad Rockenhaus means that I, as relay operator, don't need to deal with a torrent of abuse complaints because of usual

Re: [tor-relays] Help us get recent cached consensuses from your relay

On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 20:00:09 +1000 teor wrote: > Hi, > > Due to a recent CollecTor outage, we are missing consensuses from > 2018-08-04 19:00 to 2018-08-05 17:00 UTC. We can recover about 16 of > the missing consensuses, but we are still looking for the older 7. > > If your relay is: > *

Re: [tor-relays] Tor bridge on Windows 10 going down for a reason I cannot detect?

On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 01:13:53 -0700 Keifer Bly wrote: > Hello all, for some reason my tor bridge at > https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/148BD64BED9F2C27637D986DE032ECF14E5B9E9A > is randomly removed from the network. Tonight when I went to check > it, tor metrics said it had said it

Re: [tor-relays] freebsd relay doesnt receive any traffic (after 1 month)

On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 17:48:09 + dluga...@protonmail.com wrote: > In did, I have to read more carefully attached documentation. > After small changes torrc looks like this: > > Does any one of You see any wrong parameters ? > > ## > SocksPort 0 > Log notice file

Re: [tor-relays] Greypony / Conrad Rockenhaus offline?

On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 19:50:06 + "Isaac Grover, Aileron I.T." wrote: > Good afternoon fellow relay operators, > > My exit node hosted with Greypony IT (ephesysnull - > 2426F096372BCAB360B75D463AEBD7B7B8BFF0FF) has gone offline, > greyponyit.com is also offline, and emails to Conrad Rockenhaus

Re: [tor-relays] DNS Server

On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 11:23:50 +0100 dns1...@riseup.net wrote: > Of course. But, as far as I know, you can host multiple domains to > the same ip. So, in such case, if you only know the ip you can't tell > what domain I visit. > If your adversary is able to catch your packets, then he's able to

Re: [tor-relays] Protecting the bridge port from active probes

On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 17:08:38 + Marek Szuba wrote: > Anyway, here is my logic. In order to operate properly, my bridge must > have its ORPort reachable from the Internet. I might be wrong, but I got impression that if bridge is using pluggable transports (obfs3, obfs4, meek, snowflake, etc)

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay says it is reachable, but is not appearing on the network.

On Tue, 21 May 2019 23:36:28 -0700 Keifer Bly wrote: > Hi, so the relay in question does indeed have a reserved Static IP > (104.154.93.253), and the traffic is allowed by the firewall, but the > relay is still not appearing in the consensus. The port it's running > on is 65534. This is starting

Re: [tor-relays] Question: RAM requirement for an exit relay

On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 20:37:22 +0100 Olaf Grimm wrote: > Hello! > > I would like to activate a local DNS resolver with unbound at the exit > relays, but I am concerned about the RAM size with 1GB. On an example > machine I have 2GB RAM and the exit relay occupies 400MB at 22.9 MiB/s > according

Re: [tor-relays] Bridge operator iat_mode setting

"ServerTransportOptions obfs4 iat-mode=2" in torrc On February 25, 2021 11:16:52 AM GMT+03:00, "Toralf Förster" wrote: >On 2/24/21 9:34 PM, William Kane wrote: >> Thank you for running obfs4 bridges with iat_mode != 0, only very few >> obfs4 bridges support the additional traffic obfuscation