So Unbound looks like nice for this features ;)
Easy to set up in a Linux/Windows box as server, it can be used on
localhost when connecting to unknown wifi... low memory/cpu usage.
It's used everyday for home/work since on long time ago... surf, etc...
teor :
> Using a caching, recursive resol
> On 6 Aug 2017, at 02:57, Petrusko wrote:
>
> On my LAN I'm using Unbound, forwarding all requests to "root servers".
>
> I've read it's not really cool for a high traffic server, to preserve
> those root servers...?
> But for home, I think it's perfect.
>
> For an exit, why not using too a d
On my LAN I'm using Unbound, forwarding all requests to "root servers".
I've read it's not really cool for a high traffic server, to preserve
those root servers...?
But for home, I think it's perfect.
For an exit, why not using too a dns cache as Igor said, may be less
agressive for the root serv
I use pure IPv6 on a bind caching nameserver:
2001:4860:4860::8844; 2001:1608:10:25::1c04:b12f; 2600::1;
Considering the throughput of my exit node and the amount of dns
cached, I not leaking as much as you might expect.
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 2:38 PM, teor wrote:
>
>> On 5 Aug 2017, at 00:29,
> On 5 Aug 2017, at 00:29, niftybunny wrote:
>
> I got lots of "[WARN] eventdns: All nameservers have failed" with my own DNS
> server. With the 4 DNS servers I posted here a few minutes ago, I never saw
> this warning again.
Apparently this warning happens when you have one DNS server in re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/04/2017 04:11 PM, Chuck McAndrew wrote:
> What are the best DNS servers to use for Privacy? I have been using
Look into [1]
Therefore I decided to use the DNS of my AS. Because AS does already see my IP,
there'S no need to involve a third pa
> On 4. Aug 2017, at 18:43, Nagaev Boris wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 3:18 PM, niftybunny
> mailto:ab...@to-surf-and-protect.net>> wrote:
>> I use:
>>
>> nameserver 204.152.184.76
>> nameserver 194.150.168.168
>> nameserver 213.73.91.35
>> nameserver 8.8.8.8
>>
>> works fine. Google as ga
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 3:18 PM, niftybunny
wrote:
> I use:
>
> nameserver 204.152.184.76
> nameserver 194.150.168.168
> nameserver 213.73.91.35
> nameserver 8.8.8.8
>
> works fine. Google as gateway of last resort :)
I'd add also 77.88.8.8 (https://dns.yandex.ru) and 80.80.80.80
(http://freenom.w
On Fri, 4 Aug 2017 16:18:23 +0200
niftybunny wrote:
> I use:
>
> nameserver 204.152.184.76
> nameserver 194.150.168.168
> nameserver 213.73.91.35
> nameserver 8.8.8.8
>
> works fine. Google as gateway of last resort :)
A common gotcha, only the first three will be used, the rest are apparently
Check this list and choose the ones with the lowest ping from your node:
https://www.lifewire.com/free-and-public-dns-servers-2626062
Make sure to avoid DNS servers marketed as "secure" (for example, do
NOT use "Comodo Secure DNS") since they perform arbitrary
censorship/redirection. Also, do not
I got lots of "[WARN] eventdns: All nameservers have failed" with my own DNS
server. With the 4 DNS servers I posted here a few minutes ago, I never saw
this warning again.
niftybunny
“Cheery was aware that Commander Vimes didn't like the phrase 'The innocent
have nothing to fear', believing
On 8/4/17 10:11, Chuck McAndrew wrote:
> What are the best DNS servers to use for Privacy? I have been using
> OpenNic Project servers which don't do logging, but recently found out
> about the Open Root Server Network (ORSN) and have been considering
> using them as well. Does anyone have any th
I use:
nameserver 204.152.184.76
nameserver 194.150.168.168
nameserver 213.73.91.35
nameserver 8.8.8.8
works fine. Google as gateway of last resort :)
niftybunny
Where ignorance is bliss, 'Tis folly to be wise.
Thomas Gray
> On 4. Aug 2017, at 16:11, Chuck McAndrew
> wrote:
>
> What are t
13 matches
Mail list logo
