On 10/12/11 12:10 AM, Greg Kalitnikoff wrote:
I speak Russian, but I don`t think those people would be interested in
such documents. I made some little more deep research for this
conversation and as I see all that they did was getting TBB,
unpacking it, adding some bookmarks and tweaks to
On 10/11/11 7:47 AM, Mike Perry wrote:
I more or less give this plan my stamp of approval. Just mind the
gaps, and careful with NPAPI! I am able to review and advise XUL+XPCOM
code for security.. But for NPAPI, we'll need someone else.
Anyone on-list have any expertise with processing
Is it safe to install the Xmarks extension in the Tor browser?
Thanks.
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 04:46:02 -0700, Colin Klett wrote:
Is it safe to install the Xmarks extension in the Tor browser?
From https://www.xmarks.com/about/privacy
If you use an Xmarks Add-on, it will contact our servers periodically
or in response to certain actions you take in your browser.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello folks,
Early today I was testing a ejabberd server under Tor Hidden service,
while testing the correct configuration of the messenger service
I was looking at the /var/log/ejabberd/ejabberd.log file to spot any
errors or strange alerts.
For
On 2011-10-12 14:14 , phil...@bailey.st wrote:
[..]
Opened session for test2@x.onion/foobar
I guess is not normal to have your hostname going to some tor end point,
is this leak related to PSI or maybe some other misconfiguration.
That 'foobar' portion (or the long number in
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 09:47:26AM -0500, joebtfs...@gmx.com wrote 0.5K bytes
in 11 lines about:
: Immediately after extracting / starting the latest stable TBB
: 2.2.33-2 (today) from
: https://www.torproject.org/download/download-easy.html.en, Aurora
: popped a msg saying a newer version was
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 05:18:14PM +, unkn...@pgpru.com wrote 2.0K bytes in
52 lines about:
: Linux provided system Tor-daemon seems more secure then tor started from
user.
Seems and is may be two different things.
: Is it version developed especially for enforcing use TBB as is?
No, but
bump
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Roc Admin onionrou...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey, it's been a while so I'm sorry if this has already been
discussed. Hadn't seen it in the archives
I wanted to bring up the subject of Convergence.io as it fits in with
Tor. Details here: http://convergence.io/
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 21:39:46 +0400
unknown unkn...@pgpru.com wrote:
We talk about it day ago on some web-resource. Possible with you personally
:-)
Linux provided system Tor-daemon seems more secure then tor started from user.
I propose next steps but concern about any Gotcha! here:
1)
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:18:14 +
unknown unkn...@pgpru.com wrote:
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 21:39:46 +0400
unknown unkn...@pgpru.com wrote:
We talk about it day ago on some web-resource. Possible with you personally
:-)
Linux provided system Tor-daemon seems more secure then tor started
NOTE: my 2nd reply to Andrew's response - still getting update
available after installing (latest) latest TBB. Tor-talk must be down
- not seen new msgs in a while.
On 10/12/2011 10:05 AM, and...@torproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 09:47:26AM -0500, joebtfs...@gmx.com wrote 0.5K
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 14:01:33 -0400
and...@torproject.org wrote:
did it call a different profile?
Before this I just use full path without start-script and not bother about
profiles.
This version not working without changing $HOME environment variable to `pwd`
in start-script.
OK, I use
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 05:36:25PM +, unkn...@pgpru.com wrote 2.5K bytes in
65 lines about:
: Now firefox started and working wihout crash but I see
: this error message again. And I lost all my bookmarks with this.
did it call a different profile?
: Hope that Debian packages with separated
14 matches
Mail list logo
