Speaking of which, is there a way to disable autoports in TBB? Both
torrc and Torbutton have settings which look like they should control
it, but neither seems to have the desired effect.
In Vidalia, go to Settings-Advanced and untick the box that says 'Configure
ControlPort automatically'.
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 23:35:18 -0700
Jacob Appelbaum ja...@appelbaum.net wrote:
On 10/30/2011 05:37 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 05:31:34PM -0700, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
otherwise, I sometimes use a
HTTP proxy with proxychains to prevent DNS leaky applications that
Hey watch this!
http://pastebin.com/hquN9kg5
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Joe Btfsplk joebtfs...@gmx.com 於 2011/11/2 12:06 寫道：
On 11/1/2011 8:23 PM, Advrk Aplmkt wrote:
Thanks Joe for the info.
Yes, I *do* know how to remove search engines, including the method you
described.
However, I was suggesting that Google (and probably some of the other
defaults) be not
On 02/11/11 21:00, Perforin wrote:
Hey watch this!
http://pastebin.com/hquN9kg5
Is it really possible that over 100 fools would have downloaded a
purported Tor security update from Hard Candy in one day? In the middle
of an attack by OpDarknet? Seriously?
OK, I get that. Notwithstanding, there is the warning:
Advice for editors: this page is subject to constant vandalism; before
editing the page, please check history and make sure you don't
contribute on top of the vandalized versions.
Anyway, I note that there is no pornography on the Hard
nobody ever said people were smart, especially when they believe they
are totally secured
Sent from my iPhone 4
On Nov 2, 2011, at 6:59 PM, Gozu-san g...@xerobank.net wrote:
On 02/11/11 21:00, Perforin wrote:
Hey watch this!
http://pastebin.com/hquN9kg5
Is it really possible that over
On 02/11/11 23:32, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
I have no concrete knowledge if it would violate any Mozilla agreements.
As the GPL is one of the license options, there is no way that any
contract or agreement between Google and Mozilla could possibly be
binding on a third party. Mozilla do impose
On 11/2/2011 4:40 PM, Advrk Aplmkt wrote:
Joe Btfsplk joebtfs...@gmx.com 於 2011/11/2 12:06 寫道：
On 11/1/2011 8:23 PM, Advrk Aplmkt wrote:
Thanks Joe for the info.
Yes, I *do* know how to remove search engines, including the method you
described.
However, I was suggesting that Google (and
On Tuesday, November 01, 2011 00:11:49 Jim wrote:
I haven't seen this brought up on this list yet, so I thought I would
mention it. Tech Dirt (among others) are reporting on yet another round
of misguided (U.S.) legislation supposedly targeting copyright
infringement. Part of this
On 11/02/2011 05:54 PM, Gozu-san wrote:
Is it really possible that over 100 fools would have downloaded a
purported Tor security update from Hard Candy in one day? In the middle
of an attack by OpDarknet? Seriously?
Mozilla stats https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/statistics/addon/2275
seem
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Andrew Lewman and...@torproject.org wrote:
On Tuesday, November 01, 2011 00:11:49 Jim wrote:
I haven't seen this brought up on this list yet, so I thought I would
mention it. Tech Dirt (among others) are reporting on yet another round
of misguided (U.S.)
Expert review of OpDarknet's The Honey Pawt malware, and precisely how
The Mozilla Foundation was involved, seems crucial. Perhaps The Tor
Project's Onion Logo trademark was infringed, and perhaps The Mozilla
Foundation did not exercise due diligence. Or maybe OpDarknet just said
that for lulz.
hello:
i believe there is a real need for secure communications but as a new user
to tor it seems the common entry points to the network are rife with
criminal activity.
the torproject website lists users as friends and family, military,
business owners etc - use cases that make sense to me, but
14 matches
Mail list logo
