On 11/29/2011 3:12 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
1st, I guess some default settings in Aurora are actually stored in
prefs.js (as in USER set prefs)? If so, meaning the user prefs file
isn't only user prefs - it has prefs set by Aurora devs?
Re: shooting myself in the foot. Maybe there's an issue
1st, I guess some default settings in Aurora are actually stored in
prefs.js (as in USER set prefs)? If so, meaning the user prefs file
isn't only user prefs - it has prefs set by Aurora devs?
Re: shooting myself in the foot. Maybe there's an issue w/ the
prefs.js file - as mentioned - by c
On 11/29/2011 06:35 AM, Adam Langley wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 6:06 AM, wrote:
>> If the SSHFP RR type is added too, people who use OpenSSH with the
>> VerifyHostKeyDNS option can benefit from public key verification when
>> SSH'ing into a box for the first time, over Tor.
>
> (It's impor
You're still doing it wrong, man.
As I said the last time you shot yourself in the foot doing this
copying the wrong way
(https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2011-October/021772.html):
I would recommend just overwriting your old TBB dir with the new data.
Sometimes we change prefs
I upgraded to latest TBB 2.2.34-3 in Vista. I usually copy my profile
from previous version of TBB / Aurora into new version, so as not to
have to redo some custom settings or reinstall a few extensions I have
in TBB.
This time, after copying the profile from older TBB & replacing the
defaul
On 29/11/11 14:35, Adam Langley wrote:
>> If the SSHFP RR type is added too, people who use OpenSSH with the
>> VerifyHostKeyDNS option can benefit from public key verification when
>> SSH'ing into a box for the first time, over Tor.
>
> (It's important to note that OpenSSH trusts the AD bit in t
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 6:06 AM, wrote:
> If the SSHFP RR type is added too, people who use OpenSSH with the
> VerifyHostKeyDNS option can benefit from public key verification when
> SSH'ing into a box for the first time, over Tor.
(It's important to note that OpenSSH trusts the AD bit in the DN
Are there any plans to add support for the DNSSEC related RR types to
the DNS resolver built into Tor? Ie, DNSKEY, RRSIG, DS, NSEC and NSEC3?
If not, I think it would be a good thing to add, now the root zone and
major top level zones have been signed, browsers are starting to
experiment with using
>> : > Or in your torrc, unset/remove:
>> : >
>> : > SocksPort auto
>> : > ControlPort auto
>> : >
>> : this didnt help
>>
>> were these set in your torrc? and did you restart after removing them?
> yes
I've also previously noted the problem where using the UI doesn't
work. I'm pretty sure this ha
Hi Ryan,
You'd still be anonymous without it, but using NoScript has its benefits.
There's a bit of a speed increase because you're not loading all of the extra
scripts that most sites have (including visitor tracking scripts like Google
Analytics).
Best,
Griffin
- Original Message --
Hi all,
I am using Mac OS X and running the Vidalia Bundle. For my network connection
that connects me to the internet, I have the Polipo address and port configured
as the Web proxy, Secure Web proxy and SOCKS proxy in the network preferences.
Now, this seems to have worked, as all of my browser
Hi, If I am using the Tor browser bundle, does having the NoScript addon
enabled offer any benefit? Would I still be completely anonymous if I used Tor
browser with NoScript disabled?
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists
12 matches
Mail list logo
