I hope this is the right list for this. I am trying to get setup to
freenode and have irssi sasl'd over tor, but I can't seem to get this
enabled with SSL. I've tried using torsocks and socat.
On my gentoo box I start things as ...
$ /etc/init.d/tor start
$ usewithtor irssi
or if using socat
On 5/6/12, Shane software.research.developm...@gmail.com wrote:
I hope this is the right list for this. I am trying to get setup to
freenode and have irssi sasl'd over tor, but I can't seem to get this
enabled with SSL. I've tried using torsocks and socat.
Does Freenode's hidden service
Does Freenode's hidden service support SSL? Does it support SSL on port 6697?
Yes it does. 6697, 7000, 7070 that I know of ... These are my latest tries.
// /etc/tor/torrc
User tor
PIDFile /var/run/tor/tor.pid
Log notice syslog
DataDirectory /var/lib/tor/data
# tried these as well
Of what use is a bridge working off an IP address of a provider located
in, say, the US, to a client in, say, Syria? Sorry for the elementary
question. - eli
--
gpg: 0xE498E90D
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
On Fri, 04 May 2012, grarpamp wrote:
If anyone would like to volunteer for this small project, here is an
open invitation... :)
What is msmtp?
http://msmtp.sourceforge.net/
http://wiki.mutt.org/?LightSMTPagents/Msmtp
I'm very interested in this, using msmtp and ssh-tunnel solutions
myself
and there is also a proposal with the changes to be
made [1]. Unfortunately, the implementation of the proposal
hasn't started yet.
Why doesn't the proposal suggest doing it in seemingly natural way,
i.e., to add the possibility to specify proxy for the transport. Why
does tor need to be aware
On 06/05/12 08:19, Shane wrote:
Does Freenode's hidden service support SSL? Does it support SSL on port
6697?
Yes it does. 6697, 7000, 7070 that I know of ... These are my latest tries.
There's no point in adding a layer of SSL over hidden services; the
connection is already encrypted
I am pretty sure this is not relevant,
But can someone tell me what the HttpProxy does in torrc? Will this
forward outgoing traffic through a proxy server if it is defined for an
exit relay on others traffic?
Matt
On Sunday, May 6, 2012, Veggie Monster wrote:
and there is also a proposal
On 05/06/2012 03:52 AM, Mix+TB Test wrote:
Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
Hi,
A few Tor hackers (Sukhbir, tagnar, myself, etc) are working on a plugin
for Thunderbird that attempts to Torify it properly. The codename for
now is 'torbutton-birdy' and it is based largely on the seminal
analysis[-1]
There's no point in adding a layer of SSL over hidden services; the
connection is already encrypted end to end.
I thought it was more like proxy-to-proxy leaving a small in-the-clear
gaps on the ends.
___
tor-talk mailing list
On 06/05/12 18:02, Shane wrote:
There's no point in adding a layer of SSL over hidden services; the
connection is already encrypted end to end.
I thought it was more like proxy-to-proxy leaving a small in-the-clear
gaps on the ends.
I guess so. There's a chance that the Tor daemon is
jaro...@dyne.org says:
I'm very interested in this,
Hi :) I think the motivation is to make the use of SOCKS with msmtp
simple. Which generally means SOCKS being added to msmtp itself.
Certainly not only for Tor, but also for biz, edu, and gov firewalls
as well. Lots of good use cases there
12 matches
Mail list logo
