Re: [tor-talk] Make Wifi available through Tor?

2012-12-20 Thread bao song
I prefer that no one be sure exactly where I am. Of course, to use Internet banking, they have to know WHO I am, which is OK as long as they don't know where. But my bank, like the first post here that Andrew answered, does not permit access from countries other that the one I'm in, so, when I

Re: [tor-talk] 'You are not using Tor'

2012-12-20 Thread Moritz Bartl
Hi bao, Looks like some relay is configured to use a different address for outgoing traffic than for incoming traffic. You can look up relays on Atlas [1], and a relay on the same subnet is https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/91B96543A8BE94D6A8ED3ED31AB8782D8B5099C2 It uses 202.189.69.158 as

Re: [tor-talk] 'You are not using Tor'

2012-12-20 Thread Moritz Bartl
On 20.12.2012 15:36, Andrew Buckeridge wrote: It uses 202.189.69.158 as OR address. Its meant to use 202.189.69.158 as I do not want 202.189.69.150 black listed. On a machine with multiple interfaces how do I get Tor to use just one? OutboundBindAddress 202.189.69.158:9001 -- Moritz Bartl

Re: [tor-talk] tor versus freenet

2012-12-20 Thread Andrew Lewman
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 20:25:35 +0100 folkert folk...@vanheusden.com wrote: In short: can't we combine these two? Others have done it, so it can be done. Others have combined tor and tahoe-lafs as well. I'm not sure what you're asking. Are you throwing the idea out there to see if others agree and

Re: [tor-talk] Make Wifi available through Tor?

2012-12-20 Thread adrelanos
There two older threads about this topic: https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2012-July/024962.html https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2012-August/025052.html ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org

Re: [tor-talk] tor versus freenet

2012-12-20 Thread Randolph D.
just implement a proxy for tor in http://offsystem.sourceforge.net/ 2012/12/17 folkert folk...@vanheusden.com Hi, We have Tor, we have Freenet. One is for protecting network sessions, the other one for data. In short: can't we combine these two? Freenet serves a purpose but it is, for the

Re: [tor-talk] tor versus freenet

2012-12-20 Thread folkert
In short: can't we combine these two? Others have done it, so it can be done. Others have combined tor and tahoe-lafs as well. I'm not sure what you're asking. Tahoe-lafs is not the same. Freenet, if I understood it correctly, distributes files in blocks over multiple nodes, not defined by a

Re: [tor-talk] tor versus freenet

2012-12-20 Thread folkert
Yes, offsystem sounds like freenet. But it is another program you have to install, configure and whatnot. I especially opt for integration in Tor to simply the use. Yes, freenet has installers etc but it is Java and everybody seems to hate Java these days and all CERTs seem to advise people to