[tor-talk] Build tor on DiskStation

2013-01-07 Thread Jan Strube
Hello, I´m trying to build tor version 0.2.3.25 on a Synology DiskStation running BusyBox. Although I installed the openssl and openssl-dev packages version 0.9.8v I am getting the following error running the configure script: Found linkable openssl in (system), but it does not seem to run,

Re: [tor-talk] First TBB-2013 signatures missed

2013-01-07 Thread unknown
OK, now all signatures at the place, thanks. On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 13:30:56 + unknown wrote: https://www.torproject.org/dist/torbrowser/linux/ https://www.torproject.org/dist/torbrowser/linux/tor-browser-gnu-linux-i686-2.3.25-2-dev-en-US.tar.gz

Re: [tor-talk] Cupcake: browser extension for flash proxies

2013-01-07 Thread Andrew Lewman
An administrative note, please don't cross-post lists. Choose one. Thanks. -- Andrew http://tpo.is/contact pgp 0x6B4D6475 ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

[tor-talk] On the Theory of Remailers

2013-01-07 Thread Tom Ritter
I'm hoping this will be of interest to this list. To encourage interest in the waning art of remailers, I'm starting what I aim to be a long series on how they work, design choices, technical limitations, and attacks. The first five are now live at https://crypto.is/blog/ -tom

Re: [tor-talk] On the Theory of Remailers

2013-01-07 Thread David H. Lipman
From: Tom Ritter t...@ritter.vg I'm hoping this will be of interest to this list. To encourage interest in the waning art of remailers, I'm starting what I aim to be a long series on how they work, design choices, technical limitations, and attacks. The first five are now live at

Re: [tor-talk] On the Theory of Remailers

2013-01-07 Thread Tom Ritter
On 7 January 2013 15:53, David H. Lipman dlip...@verizon.net wrote: I hope you fully elaborate on how remailers are used for abuse. -- Dave I intend to, but I've never been the receiving end of remailer abuse, so I've only got academic knowledge. I had a few ideas I was brainstorming about

Re: [tor-talk] On the Theory of Remailers

2013-01-07 Thread David H. Lipman
From: Moritz Bartl mor...@torservers.net On 07.01.2013 21:53, David H. Lipman wrote: I'm hoping this will be of interest to this list. To encourage interest in the waning art of remailers, I'm starting what I aim to be a long series on how they work, design choices, technical limitations, and

Re: [tor-talk] Cupcake: browser extension for flash proxies

2013-01-07 Thread Griffin Boyce
Will do, sorry about that! ^_^; On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Andrew Lewman and...@torproject.is wrote: An administrative note, please don't cross-post lists. Choose one. Thanks. -- Andrew http://tpo.is/contact pgp 0x6B4D6475 ___ tor-talk

Re: [tor-talk] On the Theory of Remailers

2013-01-07 Thread adrelanos
I'm hoping this will be of interest to this list. To encourage interest in the waning art of remailers, I'm starting what I aim to be a long series on how they work, design choices, technical limitations, and attacks. The first five are now live at https://crypto.is/blog/ -tom

Re: [tor-talk] On the Theory of Remailers

2013-01-07 Thread grarpamp
It is an interesting questions, if with a modern user interface, can they get to new life? I see no reason the state of the art from the legacy remailer types can't be combined and updated into a new service running on some of the same relay machines we have for Tor today. Even if only 10% ran

Re: [tor-talk] On the Theory of Remailers

2013-01-07 Thread Moritz Bartl
On 08.01.2013 05:29, grarpamp wrote: It is an interesting questions, if with a modern user interface, can they get to new life? I see no reason the state of the art from the legacy remailer types can't be combined and updated into a new service running on some of the same relay machines we