Hi!
I haven't seen TOR Fone discussions on this list. Description (selection
by adrelanos, see TOR Fone homepage [1] for original text).
TORFone was designed to communicate voice via Internet (make phone calls to
the addressee) similarly to Skype but with the following differences:
1.
On 2/3/13 2:49 PM, adrelanos wrote:
Hi!
I haven't seen TOR Fone discussions on this list. Description (selection
by adrelanos, see TOR Fone homepage [1] for original text).
While i appreciate the effort, i think that the approach of TorFone
(http://torfone.org/) is not good and cannot scale
Fabio Pietrosanti (naif):
f) The system is not cross-platform, not easy portable, not easily
maintainable (it cannot goes over Linux or Tails for example)
[...]
The most reasonable and maintainable approach is:
- Use Jitsi (http://www.jitsi.org) [...]
Packing Jitsi for Debian (Tails)
On 02/03/2013 11:14 PM, adrelanos wrote:
Packing Jitsi for Debian (Tails) doesn't look very promising at the moment:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=627362
I am actually a bigger fan of SFLPhone for simple, clean, secure VoIP on
Linux, and the good news is this:
Nathan Freitas:
On 02/03/2013 11:14 PM, adrelanos wrote:
Packing Jitsi for Debian (Tails) doesn't look very promising at the moment:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=627362
I am actually a bigger fan of SFLPhone for simple, clean, secure VoIP on
Linux, and the good news is
What is your objection to C++?
On 2/3/2013 08:48, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
It looks good - though I'm a bit sad to see that it appears to be
written in C++.
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 01:49:50PM +, adrelanos wrote:
I haven't seen TOR Fone discussions on this list. Description (selection
by adrelanos, see TOR Fone homepage [1] for original text).
Ugh! Another project using the Tor name in a confusing way (which
will make people think it is
Jacob Appelbaum:
It looks good - though I'm a bit sad to see that it appears to be
written in C++.
Which languages would you prefer?
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 12:47:51 -0500
Roger Dingledine a...@mit.edu wrote:
I'll try to find some time to contact the person off-line and suggest
changing the name to 'OnionFone' or something more generic. Please
feel free to do so in parallel to me, since I know somebody here has
much more free
Andrew Lewman:
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 12:47:51 -0500
Roger Dingledine a...@mit.edu wrote:
I'll try to find some time to contact the person off-line and suggest
changing the name to 'OnionFone' or something more generic. Please
feel free to do so in parallel to me, since I know somebody here has
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Softail black98fx...@gmail.com wrote:
What is your objection to C++?
Jacob is not great at C++, apparently.
(there is nothing wrong with C++ used properly and done well... except
the lack of an ABI; you win some you lose some ;)
on a more on-topic note i do not
coderman:
on a more on-topic note i do not expect to see usable VoIP over Tor
until datagram transport(s) are implemented. i'd love to be proved
wrong...
Don't you think push to talk would be useful?
___
tor-talk mailing list
push-to-talk with procedure words over zrtp would be applicable. use
FEC to accommodate reasonable loss over datagram Tor.
both Whisper Systems and Guardian Project are working on PTT
capabilities, iirc.
last but not least, the codec makes no difference until larger issues
are worked out, for
On 2/3/13 9:23 PM, coderman wrote:
push-to-talk with procedure words over zrtp would be applicable. use
FEC to accommodate reasonable loss over datagram Tor.
both Whisper Systems and Guardian Project are working on PTT
capabilities, iirc.
last but not least, the codec makes no difference
Hi! Thank you for your comments and tips!
I did not think this project as a finished product for practical use.
This is only a platform to explore the possibility of transmission of
voice over TOR. Also I tried to spend as little effort to research and
choose the best for me platform for their
On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 12:03:33 +, coderman wrote:
...
(there is nothing wrong with C++ used properly and done well...
At some project size the 'used properly and done well' becomes
a big if. I do some C++, but I can easily understand people
not liking C++.
Andreas
--
Totally trivial. Famous
coderman:
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Softail black98fx...@gmail.com wrote:
What is your objection to C++?
Jacob is not great at C++, apparently.
(there is nothing wrong with C++ used properly and done well... except
the lack of an ABI; you win some you lose some ;)
on a more
To be clearer, I was wondering if there was some specific security issue
with C++. I'm aware that it is a difficult language to use correctly and
often isn't.
On 2/3/2013 14:22, Softail wrote:
Agreed.
I was wondering if there was some specific problem with C++ that I
wasn't aware of.
Thanks
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)
li...@infosecurity.ch wrote:
...
To work over high latency (and tipically also low-bandwidth) with
reliable transport (like TCP/Tor) you need to use those multimedia strategy:
- setup a large static jitter buffer (you define the added
19 matches
Mail list logo
