On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:56 AM, David Huerta huerta...@opentil.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
... The problem is that
Twilio WebRTC requires UDP connections over ports 10,000 to 60,000 and
at least from my research (correct me if I'm wrong), Tor doesn't do
onion
What's the current state of Pidgin? Specifically about DNS for IRC?
Can I use Polipo or Privoxy to make sure Pidgin doesn't leak DNS?
Tor IM Browser Bundle discontinued temporarily (from 2011, that's a serious
temporary time period!)
From:Karsten N. k...@awxcnx.de
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 12:46 PM
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Current state of Pidgin and Tor? DNS fix w/Privoxy or
Polipo? TIMBB?
On 10.06.2013 20:34, Cat S wrote:
Audit pidgin for leaks and other privacy issues
Other privacy
On 06/10/2013 03:54 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:56 AM, David Huerta huerta...@opentil.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
... The problem is that
Twilio WebRTC requires UDP connections over ports 10,000 to 60,000 and
at least from my research
I really love it.
Check out the Tor Atlas Page:
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/AF32506D548DAE6C17C02BE7E9F824467D546DC9
It runs at average of 3.80MBPS but sometimes is pumping up to 10MBPS
according to Tor Arm. Also my server provider DigitalOcean has not send me
any abuse complaints since
I don't have a need for UDP as I mostly browse the web and stream Spotify
which can be done over HTTPS...
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:57 PM, mirimir miri...@riseup.net wrote:
On 06/10/2013 03:54 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:56 AM, David Huerta huerta...@opentil.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/10/13 11:54 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:56 AM, David Huerta huerta...@opentil.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
... The problem is that
Twilio WebRTC requires UDP connections over ports 10,000
