Matt Pagan:
On 6/16/13, Andreas Krey a.k...@gmx.de wrote:
On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 19:09:28 +, Mike Perry wrote:
...
For everyone who is experiencing these crashes: Do you have a system tor
installed? If so, if you uninstall it and reboot, does TBB still crash?
Not sure what 'system
e...@tormail.org:
Is it possible to do Tor transparent proxying over OpenVPN i.e. My
connection - OpenVPN - Tor ?
The purpose of this would be to stop the ISP from seeing that Tor is being
used.
If that's your goal, I strongly suggest using obfsucated bridges
instead:
On 16.06.2013 07:20, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
In this case, FirefoxPortable should probably be writing its lock file
to a temporary directory or the User's application data directory
The idea is not to leave any traces outside the Tor Browser Bundle
directory. TBB is not meant to be installed into
On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 23:05:12 +, Mike Perry wrote:
...
Are any of you who experience crashes installing to the Desktop (the
default)?
I have it in the desktop, just renamed the folder (and did installation
and execution as the same user). But I will try a different machine on
monday; this
On 2013-06-15 04:39, Mike Perry wrote:
The new TBB 3.0 series is almost ready for its first alpha release!
Please try these out, test them, and give us feedback! The plan is to
post them on the blog by Monday, unless something goes horribly wrong.
Hi,
I'd like to raise concerns about third-party QAs and discuss them.
This is independent from stackexchange. (I don't mind using stackexchange)
Points regarding third-party operated and/or hosted QAs
Advantages:
- No server costs
- No bandwidth costs
- No installing or updating software
-
Hello,
I'd like to raise awareness and discuss the scope Stackexchange has (or
seems to have).
Initially I planed to await a reply by Runa, but now I assume that
there's no reason to just wait for a reply. Runa will be still able to
reply.
Regarding the use-case and their guidelines.
The FAQ
Hi,
to get this nice and clean a third topic.
No further topic regarding QA will follow today.
You had ask.TPO with Askbot already running and it is still running. All
it seems to take is an active community that feeds it with questions and
answers them.
Do you plan to use Stackexchange
This is also the case with tor-browser-linux32-3.0-alpha-1_fa.tar.xz -
no text is displayed on the first screen that opens after running the
program, and both the 'connect' and 'configure' buttons are blank.
Arjan:
On 2013-06-15 04:39, Mike Perry wrote:
The new TBB 3.0 series is almost ready
Hi!
I'd like to raise concerns about third-party QAs and discuss them.
I was also wondering [1] about that already.
After all the years of arguing over a forum, you now finally end up
using some free service with no control about its servers? Didn't the
trac ticket say, you have sponsoring for
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 11:09 AM, adrelanos adrela...@riseup.net wrote:
Hi!
[...]
Well, I guess
having any non-ideal Q/A forum is better than forever having no Q/A forum.
Hi, Adrelanos!
You have hit the nail on the head with that part.
So because I'm not principally involved with the
On 06/15/2013 07:22 PM, Mike Perry wrote:
And do you think it would be possible to only update
RecommendedTBBVersions when there's an associated tarball available
for download in a predictable place so that we don't get into a
situation where there's an updated version but TBL can't find
Hi bastik,
It was decided that we have no resources to maintain our own QA, and
that having a third-party QA is better than none. I disagree, but
that's not the point. I agree that the community should have been
involved in this process more. In the end, from what I see, most Tor
developers have
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Moritz Bartl mor...@torservers.net wrote:
On 16.06.2013 07:20, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
In this case, FirefoxPortable should probably be writing its lock file
to a temporary directory or the User's application data directory
The idea is not to leave any traces
Tor 0.2.4.13-alpha fixes a variety of potential remote crash
vulnerabilities, makes socks5 username/password circuit isolation
actually actually work (this time for sure!), and cleans up a bunch
of other issues in preparation for a release candidate.
https://www.torproject.org/dist/
Changes in
16.06.2013 20:38, Moritz Bartl:
Hi Moritz,
It was decided that we have no resources to maintain our own QA, and
that having a third-party QA is better than none. I disagree, but
that's not the point.
I'm not sure what you disagree with.
That there are not enough resources?
That it is
On 16.06.2013 21:33, Sebastian G. bastik.tor wrote:
It was decided that we have no resources to maintain our own QA, and
that having a third-party QA is better than none. I disagree, but
that's not the point.
I'm not sure what you disagree with.
That there are not enough resources?
That it
On Jun 16, 2013 4:38 PM, Moritz Bartl mor...@torservers.net wrote:
On 16.06.2013 21:33, Sebastian G. bastik.tor wrote:
It was decided that we have no resources to maintain our own QA, and
that having a third-party QA is better than none. I disagree, but
that's not the point.
I'm not sure
Roger Dingledine:
Tor 0.2.4.13-alpha fixes a variety of potential remote crash
vulnerabilities, makes socks5 username/password circuit isolation
actually actually work (this time for sure!), and cleans up a bunch
of other issues in preparation for a release candidate.
On 06/16/2013 07:53 AM, Lunar wrote:
e...@tormail.org:
Is it possible to do Tor transparent proxying over OpenVPN i.e. My
connection - OpenVPN - Tor ?
The purpose of this would be to stop the ISP from seeing that Tor is being
used.
If that's your goal, I strongly suggest using obfsucated
On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 15:18:47 -0700
Mike Perry mikepe...@torproject.org wrote:
Roger Dingledine:
Tor 0.2.4.13-alpha fixes a variety of potential remote crash
vulnerabilities, makes socks5 username/password circuit isolation
actually actually work (this time for sure!), and cleans up a bunch
On 13-06-16 06:49 PM, Roman Mamedov wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 15:18:47 -0700
Mike Perry mikepe...@torproject.org wrote:
Roger Dingledine:
Tor 0.2.4.13-alpha fixes a variety of potential remote crash
vulnerabilities, makes socks5 username/password circuit isolation
actually actually work
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Roman Mamedov r...@romanrm.ru wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 15:18:47 -0700
Mike Perry mikepe...@torproject.org wrote:
Roger Dingledine:
Tor 0.2.4.13-alpha fixes a variety of potential remote crash
vulnerabilities, makes socks5 username/password circuit
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 6:55 PM, krishna e bera k...@cyblings.on.ca wrote:
What if relays revert to the stable 0.2.3.latest for now?
Personally, I'd suggest that relays just stick with 0.2.4.12-alpha and
wait 0.2.4.14-alpha: we should have it out pretty darn soon.
--
Nick
Congratulations to all the contributers and project managers.
Thanks for all the hard work you have put in on this up date
Andrew
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Mike Perry mikepe...@torproject.orgwrote:
Roger Dingledine:
Tor 0.2.4.13-alpha fixes a variety of potential remote crash
The simplest solution would be to use a VM. Run the VPN client on the
host machine, and the Tor setup in the VM. You could also run the VPN
client in a pfSense VM, and the Tor setup in another VM that uses the
pfSense VM as its LAN router.
This wouldn't work for me, I only have access to an
e...@tormail.org:
I am worried about this. It's why I don't want to rely on obfuscated
bridges to hide my Tor usage, as they're not private and one day I could
get flagged as using Tor if the ISP/military/police is monitoring
connections to the bridge that I'm using at the time.
VPN seems to
e...@tormail.org:
I am worried about this. It's why I don't want to rely on obfuscated
bridges to hide my Tor usage, as they're not private and one day I could
get flagged as using Tor if the ISP/military/police is monitoring
connections to the bridge that I'm using at the time.
VPN seems to
I emailed one of the developers about this but it seems fairer to ask
the group.
Is there any reason why setting an EntryNodes configuration in the torrc
for the new alpha TBBs would prevent the browser from opening at all?
This is the only part of the configuration I have altered. The loading
If you run a VPN client and Tor client on the same machine, you will
connect to the Tor network through the VPN. I should have mentioned that
in my initial reply.
Could you take a look at my iptables rules ? I don't have much knowledge
of firewalls and I am not good at writing them myself, so I
On 06/17/2013 12:26 AM, adrelanos wrote:
e...@tormail.org:
I am worried about this. It's why I don't want to rely on obfuscated
bridges to hide my Tor usage, as they're not private and one day I could
get flagged as using Tor if the ISP/military/police is monitoring
connections to the bridge
e...@tormail.org:
e...@tormail.org:
I am worried about this. It's why I don't want to rely on obfuscated
bridges to hide my Tor usage, as they're not private and one day I could
get flagged as using Tor if the ISP/military/police is monitoring
connections to the bridge that I'm using at the
On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 15:03:13 +0200
Sebastian G. bastik.tor bastik@googlemail.com wrote:
I'd like to raise concerns about third-party QAs and discuss them.
We've had this discussion for the past year or so, see
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/5995
and
On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 15:04:08 +0200
Sebastian G. bastik.tor bastik@googlemail.com wrote:
You had ask.TPO with Askbot already running and it is still running.
All it seems to take is an active community that feeds it with
questions and answers them.
The askbot software needs work itself,
I solved my own problem - the relevant log sections are these:
Jun 17 x:16:45.000 [warn] Failed to open GEOIP file ./Data/Tor/geoip.
We've been configured to use (or avoid) nodes in certain countries, and
we need GEOIP information to figure out which ones they are.
Jun 17 x:16:45.000 [warn]
35 matches
Mail list logo
