-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/30/2013 12:16 AM, Runa A. Sandvik wrote:
Hm, there are high spikes in a lot of different countries (countries you may
not expect to see spikes
in...), such as Albania, Fiji, Costa Rica, Barbados, Bermuda, the Faroe
Islands... the list goes
In every case the growth begins on the 19th/20th and the rate seems is
susceptible to the local weekend.
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Griffin Boyce grif...@cryptolab.netwrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/30/2013 12:16 AM, Runa A. Sandvik wrote:
Hm, there are
On 30.08.2013 09:14, Mike Perry wrote:
2. If this was Pirate Browser:
They are using FoxyProxy, right? Let's assume the PirateBrowser folks
did not deactivate update checks. Then, there should be a similar spike
visible on AMO where FoxyProxy is hosted. But there is no such spike in
the
At 02:14 PM 8/29/2013 -0700, you wrote:
This conversation is a little tired.
The tinfoil hats are going to see any funding of Tor by the US government as
evidence that Tor is really a front for it and/or pwned by it.
So if facts can't be denied, and basic principles of politics and
Georg Koppen:
On 30.08.2013 09:14, Mike Perry wrote:
2. If this was Pirate Browser:
They are using FoxyProxy, right? Let's assume the PirateBrowser folks
did not deactivate update checks. Then, there should be a similar spike
visible on AMO where FoxyProxy is hosted. But there is no such
On 27.08.2013 09:08, Roger Dingledine wrote:
The number of Tor clients running appears to have doubled since August 19:
There's a slight increase (worsening) in the performance measurements:
but it's hard to say if that's a real difference.
May be a botnet is using Tor?
Karsten N.
--
Четверг, 29 августа 2013, 23:21 UTC от mirimir miri...@riseup.net:
On 08/29/2013 10:04 PM, mamoeb mamoeb wrote:
Поднял onion сайт получил доменное имя onion. Вопрос как его изменить?
вместо рандомных знаков в начале добавить названия своего сайта как?
Пример получил имя
So if facts can't be denied, and basic principles of politics and
economic 'incentives' can't be denied, the best course of action is to call
any critics tin foil hats.
So you're a critic?
Ok, Mr Critic: the source code is public. The protocol is public. The
architecture is public. The
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 01:03:49PM +0400, mamoeb mamoeb wrote:
Четверг, 29 августа 2013, 23:21 UTC от mirimir miri...@riseup.net:
On 08/29/2013 10:04 PM, mamoeb mamoeb wrote:
Поднял onion сайт получил доменное имя onion. Вопрос как его изменить?
вместо рандомных знаков в начале
Juan Garofalo:
At 02:14 PM 8/29/2013 -0700, you wrote:
This conversation is a little tired.
The tinfoil hats are going to see any funding of Tor by the US government as
evidence that Tor is really a front for it and/or pwned by it.
So if facts can't be denied, and basic
At 02:16 AM 8/30/2013 -0700, you wrote:
Juan Garofalo:
At 02:14 PM 8/29/2013 -0700, you wrote:
This conversation is a little tired.
The tinfoil hats are going to see any funding of Tor by the US government
as evidence that Tor is really a front for it and/or pwned by it.
So if
A friend of mine connected his Bitmessage client to Tor and was warned
that it might be using a protocol that makes unsafe requests. Are there
any problems using Tor with Bitmessage? Is it possible since Bitmessage
is peer to peer?
Thanks,
Anthony
--
tor-talk mailing list -
On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 02:16:06 -0700
Mike Perry mikepe...@torproject.org allegedly wrote:
Anyway, I would ask that you attempt at least one of the following:
1. Respect our efforts on this front. We're doing our best with what
we have
2. Provide citations to support your conspiracy
Hello,
Over the past couple of days Iranian users have been complaining about not
being able to download Orbot from Google's play store (error 403).
To solve the problem we at help desk send the official direct download link
that GP provides[0] but it's only a matter of time before that get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/30/2013 5:29 AM, Sherief Alaa wrote:
Hello,
Over the past couple of days Iranian users have been complaining
about not being able to download Orbot from Google's play store
(error 403).
To solve the problem we at help desk send the
At 11:19 AM 8/30/2013 +0100, you wrote:
On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 02:16:06 -0700
Mike Perry mikepe...@torproject.org allegedly wrote:
Anyway, I would ask that you attempt at least one of the following:
1. Respect our efforts on this front. We're doing our best with what
we have
2. Provide
Can i just use the netstat? How to tell if a connection is not Tor?
--
Jerzy Łogiewa -- jerz...@interia.eu
On Aug 29, 2013, at 9:02 PM, mirimir wrote:
On 08/29/2013 02:53 PM, Lodewijk andré de la porte wrote:
A firewall might well help you. Otherwise console output of made
connections
Sherief Alaa sheriefala...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Over the past couple of days Iranian users have been complaining about
not
being able to download Orbot from Google's play store (error 403).
To solve the problem we at help desk send the official direct download
link
that GP provides[0] but
WRT: May be a botnet is using Tor?
Read the thread at
http://www.spambotsecurity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=15t=2095 The title
is
Anyone else get hit by TOR-cloaked(?) botnet?
Bot with Tor addresses hitting sites and attempting SQL injection have
been seen. I don't know how widespread it is.
On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 07:34 -0300, Juan Garofalo wrote:
By the way, my original point was that if Tor people believe that
their funding scheme is not going to raise a red flag in the minds of
'ordinary people', they are mistaken.
Until you can find a better funding source in the US than the
Read the thread at
http://www.spambotsecurity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=15t=2095 The title
is
Anyone else get hit by TOR-cloaked(?) botnet?
Bot with Tor addresses hitting sites and attempting SQL injection have
been seen. I don't know how widespread it is.
Lucia
/Error 503 : Service
https://www.torproject.org/about/sponsors.html.en is on reddit/technology...
Tor Project is mostly funded by the Department of Defense.
Is it really an Non-Government Organization (NGO) backing Tor? Why are they
not named?! Any idea what's going on with the overnight traffic spike? I am
On Fri, 30 Aug 2013, lucia wrote:
WRT: May be a botnet is using Tor?
Read the thread at
http://www.spambotsecurity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=15t=2095 The title
is
Anyone else get hit by TOR-cloaked(?) botnet?
Bot with Tor addresses hitting sites and attempting SQL injection have
been seen. I
Am 2013-08-30 15:18, schrieb Zach Silver | Silver Tech:
Is it really an Non-Government Organization (NGO) backing Tor? Why are they
not named?!
This is discussed in a recent thread on this mailing list [1].
Any idea what's going on with the overnight traffic spike?
There is a thread for
Thanks, Paul.
-Original Message-
From: tor-talk [mailto:tor-talk-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of Paul
Staroch
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2013 8:43 AM
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Traffic Spike and who really backs Tor
Am 2013-08-30 15:18, schrieb
30.08.2013 Juan Garofalo:
At 02:16 AM 8/30/2013 -0700, you wrote:
Juan Garofalo:
At 02:14 PM 8/29/2013 -0700, you wrote:
This conversation is a little tired.
The tinfoil hats are going to see any funding of Tor by the US
government as evidence that Tor is really a front for it and/or
/Error 503 : Service Temporarily Unavailable/
I guess this one got hit too? ;)
Probably yes. But if you weren't visiting with Tor, there is a good chance
you would not see the 503 message. Loads fine for me. ;)
Spambotsecurity.com is Zaphod's site. He write ZBBlock which blocks any
connection
On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 02:16:06 -0700
Mike Perry mikepe...@torproject.org wrote:
3. Find better meds
4. Go fuck off
Personal attacks like this are unacceptable. Let's keep it mature and
civil, even in the face of immaturity and incivility on other sides.
--
Andrew
http://tpo.is/contact
pgp
30.08.2013 10:49, Mike Perry:
Georg Koppen:
On 30.08.2013 09:14, Mike Perry wrote:
2. If this was Pirate Browser:
They are using FoxyProxy, right? Let's assume the PirateBrowser folks
did not deactivate update checks. Then, there should be a similar spike
visible on AMO where FoxyProxy is
Original Message -
From: Juan Garofalo juan@gmail.com
Seriously what? You don't understand that baseless name calling shows that
you don't have a leg to stand on?
No more games, please. As has been pointed out, the source code is public.
Make your case if you have one.
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 04:38:21PM +0200, Sebastian G. bastik.tor wrote:
30.08.2013 Juan Garofalo:
At 02:16 AM 8/30/2013 -0700, you wrote:
Juan Garofalo:
At 02:14 PM 8/29/2013 -0700, you wrote:
[snip]
1. Respect our efforts on this front. We're doing our best with
what we have 2.
Since the Priate Browser has only been released for Windows so far, some
people who don't use Windows have been wondering what's in it. I put
a copy of Windows XP on a virtual machine to examine the contents of
the Pirate Browser package.
I used the microsoft utility FCIV to compare the md5 and
Hi Mike,
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Mike Perry mikepe...@torproject.orgwrote:
Dude I love math and whatnot. Maybe science too, but this isn't exactly
a controlled experiment. So whatnot it is, then! (Also plus one to you
Collin, for being awesome).
Can someone with more free time than
On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 16:29 +, Matt Pagan wrote:
http://uj3wazyk5u4hnvtk.onion/
http://omcwtrnyrzlwzv22.onion/
These hidden services point to the pirate bay and eztv, for anyone
curious (I was).
--
Sent from Ubuntu
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Thanks for sharing, Collin. Those graphs are very interesting. What the hell
is going on???
-Original Message-
From: tor-talk [mailto:tor-talk-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of
Collin Anderson
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2013 11:37 AM
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/29/2013 06:55 PM,
bm-2d9whbg2vekslcsgbtplgwdlqypizsq...@bitmessage.ch wrote:
Hopefully you can understand why someone might wonder in good
faith why a third of the Tor Project's 2012 funding appears to be
disclosed only in PDFs that very
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/30/2013 06:19 AM, mick wrote:
unhelpful. When the abuse is aimed at refuting what could be seen
as conspiracy theory, I think you may be in danger of adding fuel.
The problem with conspiracy theories is that any response at all, or
nor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/29/2013 06:55 PM,
bm-2d9whbg2vekslcsgbtplgwdlqypizsq...@bitmessage.ch wrote:
This is something I do not understand.
Primary sources - those PDFs you speak of - are available. Googlable.
Readable. Discussable and understandable.
Saying
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/29/2013 05:14 PM, Al Billings wrote:
Is there likely to be a meeting of the minds or just a really long
thread that proves nothing to anyone? :-)
Doubtful. People believe whatever they want to believe, regardless of
the evidence.
And now,
On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 16:29:18 +
Matt Pagan m...@pagan.io wrote:
The Pirate Browser is based off Firefox 23.0
Extensions:
FoxyProxy Standard 4.2.2
Plugins:
Google Update 1.3.21.153
Microsoft(R) DRM 9.0.0.4503
Microsoft(R) DRM 9.0.0.4503
Windows Media Player Plug-in
I hope they are supporting servers on the network..
have they talked about that?
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Matt Pagan m...@pagan.io wrote:
On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 16:29:18 +
Matt Pagan m...@pagan.io wrote:
The Pirate Browser is based off Firefox 23.0
Extensions:
On 8/30/13, Jan-Frode Myklebust janfr...@tanso.net wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Nathan Suchy
I don't want this for piracy as I have a paid VPN account that is much
faster for that if I decide to pirate. I think we need BitTorrent
though
to
work on Tor so Tor Users can
OK. I'll consider i2p.
On Aug 30, 2013 3:21 PM, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/30/13, Jan-Frode Myklebust janfr...@tanso.net wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Nathan Suchy
I don't want this for piracy as I have a paid VPN account that is
much
faster for that if I decide
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/30/2013 04:29 PM, Ted Smith wrote:
If you truly don't understand that, I don't think anything anyone
says can help you. If you just want to express outrage that people
aren't going to comb through PDFs with a rational, perfectly
logical
On 08/30/2013 12:41 PM, Ted Smith wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 07:34 -0300, Juan Garofalo wrote:
By the way, my original point was that if Tor people believe that
their funding scheme is not going to raise a red flag in the minds of
'ordinary people', they are mistaken.
Until you can find
At 11:33 AM 8/30/2013 -0400, Paul S. wrote:
1. Respect our efforts on this front. We're doing our best with
what we have 2. Provide citations to support your conspiracy
theories of Tor's subversion
Tor is funded by the US government. Your own sources.
Indeed, it is.
Right. And
On 8/29/13, Al Billings alb...@openbuddha.com wrote:
This conversation is a little tired.
Is there likely to be a meeting of the minds or just a really long thread
that proves nothing to anyone? :-)
Tor's a 501 entity, it's books are reasonably open and subject
to data correction when pointed
On 08/30/2013 10:06 PM, Juan Garofalo wrote:
At 11:33 AM 8/30/2013 -0400, Paul S. wrote:
SNIP
See all the research on the issues trade-offs, threats, designs,
etc. that Tor Project Inc. employees, government employees,
university and corporate researchers, and lots of others have done
Juan Garofalo:
For what it's worth : trying to have a diverse and big user base, and
providing security for all users seems to be impossible. You either provide
relatively good security for a small number of sensitive users, or relatively
lax security for 'general' users.
i have
At 10:34 PM 8/30/2013 +, you wrote:
On 08/30/2013 10:06 PM, Juan Garofalo wrote:
At 11:33 AM 8/30/2013 -0400, Paul S. wrote:
SNIP
See all the research on the issues trade-offs, threats, designs,
etc. that Tor Project Inc. employees, government employees,
university and corporate
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:02:24AM -0700,
bm-2d9whbg2vekslcsgbtplgwdlqypizsq...@bitmessage.ch wrote 1.8K bytes in 0 lines
about:
: Thanks; please see https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/9614.
Updated and closed. And the website is pushed live with the new commit.
--
Andrew
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
bm-2d8jtri23dyth7whmaldhsvhdfwp91z...@bitmessage.ch:
I also opened a ticket:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/9623
Currently, when browsing on a hidden service website, when you
click on a clearnet/hidden service link it sends
On 08/31/2013 03:04 AM,
bm-2d8jtri23dyth7whmaldhsvhdfwp91z...@bitmessage.ch wrote:
My suggestion is to install
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/smart-referer/ I
believe it doesn't break anything major (it has a whitelist feature
which is very short and includes disqus.com and
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 04:29:18PM +, Matt Pagan wrote:
# Configured for speed
Just for the record, the three lines here don't help speed much (or
maybe at all).
ExcludeSingleHopRelays 0
This first line says it's ok to use relays that allow you to make one-hop
circuits. Roughly speaking,
On 13-08-31 12:25 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 04:29:18PM +, Matt Pagan wrote:
# Configured for speed
Just for the record, the three lines here don't help speed much (or
maybe at all).
ExcludeSingleHopRelays 0
This first line says it's ok to use relays that
55 matches
Mail list logo
