On 01/25/2014 08:42 PM, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 14:33:12 -0700
> Mirimir wrote:
>
>> Analogous private networks, generally called anonets, are also routed
>> via VPNs through the Internet.
>
> There is anoNet/anoNet2 [1] which are a very specific particular project; but
> that
On 1/25/2014 5:07 PM, Lunar wrote:
Joe Btfsplk:
I missed the memo on all reasons why Vidalia - bad, Tor Launcher -
good.
At least:
http://users.encs.concordia.ca/~clark/papers/2007_soups.pdf
http://petsymposium.org/2012/papers/hotpets12-1-usability.pdf
and Vidalia has no maintainers for a while
On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 14:33:12 -0700
Mirimir wrote:
> Analogous private networks, generally called anonets, are also routed
> via VPNs through the Internet.
There is anoNet/anoNet2 [1] which are a very specific particular project; but
that's the first time ever I hear that "private networks... are
2014-01-26 Joe Btfsplk
TBB 3.5 for Win is starting in half screen & the UI sizing buttons are
hidden because the TBB UI is shifted where the size buttons are off the
monitor.
So is most of the title bar, making it hard to drag the UI down to reach
buttons. Once maximized, it fits fine on the mo
You can use the windows key + an arrow key to resize and move windows. So
for example win + left arrow to make the window take over the left half of
the screen. With that you should be able to put it in the position you like
anytime.
2014-01-26 Joe Btfsplk
> TBB 3.5 for Win is starting in half
TBB 3.5 for Win is starting in half screen & the UI sizing buttons are
hidden because the TBB UI is shifted where the size buttons are off the
monitor.
So is most of the title bar, making it hard to drag the UI down to reach
buttons. Once maximized, it fits fine on the monitor.
Finally got it
I find it interesting that changes put forward by a group funded by every major
three letter intelligence agency makes it into tor. More interesting is the
fact that these changes hide who you are connected to and the ability to change
that.
That's highly exploitable.
What's going on here?
M
Joe Btfsplk:
> I missed the memo on all reasons why Vidalia - bad, Tor Launcher -
> good.
At least:
http://users.encs.concordia.ca/~clark/papers/2007_soups.pdf
http://petsymposium.org/2012/papers/hotpets12-1-usability.pdf
and Vidalia has no maintainers for a while now.
--
Lunar
On 1/25/2014 7:33 AM, Katya Titov wrote:
TT Security:
1. So "Network Map" and "New Identity" are absent now. When these
functions will be add to the TBB?
Vidalia is now a stand-alone package. Details:
https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq#WhereDidVidaliaGo
If TBB is leaving Vidalia for a "better
Moritz Bartl:
> "There are approximately 5000 Tor relays and under 2500 Tor bridges,
> this may provide an indication of an upper bound on the number of
> hidden services."
>
> There is no correlation between the number of relays and hidden
> services? Hidden services should rather be behind simp
On 01/25/2014 04:53 AM, Katya Titov wrote:
> Roger Dingledine:
>> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 06:44:11PM +1000, Katya Titov wrote:
>>> So are there any useful stats on the size of the dark web?
>>
>> Check out http://freehaven.net/anonbib/#oakland2013-trawling
>> for some statistics about the number of
You really should *not* be using ftp for anything, hidden service
or otherwise. The whole pasv epsv etc issue is a huge pain for
people. Especially over Tor/proxies/firewalls. Just switch to SFTP
and save people the pain and gain full client2server encryption in
the process.
--
tor-talk mailing li
I'm unsure, The New Identity function is critical, I think Tor Button has
it, but Network might be a deprecated function...
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Katya Titov wrote:
> TT Security:
> > 1. So "Network Map" and "New Identity" are absent now. When these
> > functions will be add to the T
On 01/25/2014 12:53 PM, Katya Titov wrote:
> I've put together an article and placed it on the Tor Trac/Wiki:
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/HowBigIsTheDarkWeb
> It's a start, and I'll keep searching for more relevant information.
Thanks for this. Quite good already!
"There a
krishna e bera:
> On 14-01-25 06:53 AM, Katya Titov wrote:
>> I've put together an article and placed it on the Tor Trac/Wiki:
>>
>> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/HowBigIsTheDarkWeb
>
> Cool - it's concise and useful as a reference point for media or
> public relations.
>
> T
On 14-01-25 06:53 AM, Katya Titov wrote:
> Roger Dingledine:
>> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 06:44:11PM +1000, Katya Titov wrote:
>>> So are there any useful stats on the size of the dark web?
>>
>> Check out http://freehaven.net/anonbib/#oakland2013-trawling
>> for some statistics about the number of h
TT Security:
> 1. So "Network Map" and "New Identity" are absent now. When these
> functions will be add to the TBB?
Vidalia is now a stand-alone package. Details:
https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq#WhereDidVidaliaGo
--
kat
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscri
Roger Dingledine:
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 06:44:11PM +1000, Katya Titov wrote:
>> So are there any useful stats on the size of the dark web?
>
> Check out http://freehaven.net/anonbib/#oakland2013-trawling
> for some statistics about the number of hidden services as of about
> a year ago. It's n
On Sat, 2014-01-25 at 05:06 -0500, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 06:44:11PM +1000, Katya Titov wrote:
> > So are there any useful stats on the size of the dark web?
>
> Check out http://freehaven.net/anonbib/#oakland2013-trawling
> for some statistics about the number of hidde
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 06:44:11PM +1000, Katya Titov wrote:
> So are there any useful stats on the size of the dark web?
Check out http://freehaven.net/anonbib/#oakland2013-trawling
for some statistics about the number of hidden services as of about
a year ago. It's not all that precise (and the
Hi Katya,
I wish there were clear definitions for these terms, but there aren't,
and I guess there never will be. I encourage you to "dig deeper" on this
topic, and collect a nice set of opinions and links somewhere. It should
not turn into a discussion on whose definition is "right" though...
In
Hi all,
I have a question or two about terminology in use when discussing
non-indexable portions of the web.
Relevant terms I see are "deep web" and "dark web", with occasional
references to "dark Internet". Definitions which I use, and which seem
to be reasonably popular are:
- Deep web:
22 matches
Mail list logo
