Maybe you find this helpful
https://elrippoisland.net/public/how_to/anonymity.html
Kind regards,
elrippo
Am Samstag, 17. Mai 2014, 18:05:38 schrieb Clare ♬:
Thanks! It's incredibly helpful to see how more experienced users have Tor
set up. Sorry again for the poor formatting in my post,
Hi - I keep getting this message in my TBB log
[warn] Rejecting SOCKS request for anonymous connection to private
address [scrubbed].
Why isn't the information regarding the source IP address being displayed?
How can I determine the source address so I can block it with iptables
on Linux?
A few years ago, ICANN started to accept suggestions for new top-level
domain names. A friend recently posted a .onion link to me, and it made me
realize that there might be a big problem if a company or organization
other than Tor actually registered .onion and made it work in any browser.
1)
Anders Andersson:
A few years ago, ICANN started to accept suggestions for new top-level
domain names. A friend recently posted a .onion link to me, and it made me
realize that there might be a big problem if a company or organization
other than Tor actually registered .onion and made it work
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 09:39:56AM -0700, Cinaed Simson wrote:
Hi - I keep getting this message in my TBB log
[warn] Rejecting SOCKS request for anonymous connection to private
address [scrubbed].
Why isn't the information regarding the source IP address being displayed?
You can edit
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 12:34:37AM +0400, Akater wrote:
So, supposedly, Tor community wants Tor spreaded, at least in the
relays direction.
Yep. But increasingly, it's becoming clear that a relay that can do
100mbit is more than 10 times more valuable than a relay that can do
10mbit. Plus the
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 07:39:24PM +0200, pipat...@gmail.com wrote 0.9K bytes
in 0 lines about:
: 2) Has Tor applied to ICANN about the .onion domain, or discussed the pro
: and con of doing this?
We didn't apply, but when inquiring about it, they wanted us to provide
trademark proof (which we
