On 2014-10-01 09:57, Derric Atzrott wrote:
About once a year the topic of Tor comes up on Wikimedia's technical mailing
list. I recently raised the topic again. For those who aren't aware of the
situation, currently Wikimedia blocks all edits from Tor users. We are trying
to find a way that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
With Tor soft-blocked, this problem goes away. What am I missing?
I'm not sure if you are saying Tor is soft-blocked, so what is the
problem? or If we soft-blocked Tor there would be no problem. So
I'm going to attempt to address both.
==Tor is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks for joining the list and starting the conversation. Are there
data sets or statistics which quantify tor usage at wikimedia? It might
help to frame the discussion if we know the scale of the tor usage or
the problem we're trying to
On 10/02/2014 06:52 AM, Derric Atzrott wrote:
SNIP
I liked the GPG idea, and brought it back to Wikitech-l. I'll let
you guys know if anyone there finds a way to completely break it.
There's another possibility that's probably easier to implement and
test, but isn't so broadly useful as a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I liked the GPG idea, and brought it back to Wikitech-l. I'll let
you guys know if anyone there finds a way to completely break it.
There's another possibility that's probably easier to implement and
test, but isn't so broadly useful as a
On 2014-10-01 13:20, Sebastian G. bastik.tor wrote:
I appear to lack imagination on how Tor helps abuse victims. Since some
of you are involved with some organizations working in that field, I
hope you give some insight.
Personally I see no benefit in using Tor from the point of view of an
On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 10:56 -0400, Andrew Lewman wrote:
On 2014-10-01 13:20, Sebastian G. bastik.tor wrote:
I appear to lack imagination on how Tor helps abuse victims. Since some
of you are involved with some organizations working in that field, I
hope you give some insight.
Personally
Hey Patrick,
Most newspapers have a taste for the salacious, and the DailyDot is not exempt
from that criticism. People buy drugs online (which is incredibly stupid for
several reasons), but that is in no way the largest use case for hidden
services. Not even close. It sells papers (and their
Thanks for the suggestions Griffin (and everyone else who has emailed me),
I really appreciate it! I'll be taking your advice and reaching out to the
people you've mentioned.
As to the complaints, since they take up a good chunk of your email: I
don't take me or my employer to be exempt from any
as I've asked before, I would appreciate any metrics, stats, or other data
that can back up claims of this sort, as well as means by which reporters
and researchers can assess them. I am thinking traffic in volume, not
number of applications (not numbers of newspapers, number of drug-based
sites,
On 2014-10-01 17:40, Patrick wrote:
Hi everyone,
Over the past few weeks, I've talked with a number of Tor people about how
the project is portrayed in the media. As a reporter on this beat, the many
legitimate criticisms the community have had strike pretty close to home
for me. I don't think
On 2014-10-02 14:15, z9wahqvh wrote:
as I've asked before, I would appreciate any metrics, stats, or other data
that can back up claims of this sort, as well as means by which reporters
and researchers can assess them.
Luckily, we have DARPA working to find out these metrics and stats, see
hey guys how can i communicate with mr S on here to discuss a possible
movie deal in the coming years
Greg Curcio
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Andrew Lewman and...@torproject.is wrote:
On 2014-10-02 14:15, z9wahqvh wrote:
as I've asked before, I would appreciate any metrics, stats, or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hey guys how can i communicate with mr S on here to discuss a possible
movie deal in the coming years
Greg,
Sorry for not returning your email last night. I am doubtful anyone
on this list knows how to get in touch with Mr. Snowden. We all use
On 10/02/2014 06:52 AM, Derric Atzrott wrote:
SNIP
I liked the GPG idea, and brought it back to Wikitech-l. I'll let
you guys know if anyone there finds a way to completely break it.
I've asked about this on gnupg-users, and have been disabused of the
notion. I get that it's too hard to
that's a funny dismissive response, but I think it is a very serious
question, and that it is taken seriously is reflected in no place more
strongly than when people on this list suggest that they know Tor is mostly
used for good purposes and that that is (implicitly or explicitly) why
they use or
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Andrew Lewman and...@torproject.is wrote:
On 2014-10-01 13:20, Sebastian G. bastik.tor wrote:
I appear to lack imagination on how Tor helps abuse victims. Since some
of you are involved with some organizations working in that field, I
hope you give some
On 10/02/2014 01:24 PM, z9wahqvh wrote:
that's a funny dismissive response, but I think it is a very serious
question, and that it is taken seriously is reflected in no place more
strongly than when people on this list suggest that they know Tor is mostly
used for good purposes and that that
On 10/02/2014 01:15 PM, Mirimir wrote:
On 10/02/2014 06:52 AM, Derric Atzrott wrote:
SNIP
I liked the GPG idea, and brought it back to Wikitech-l. I'll let
you guys know if anyone there finds a way to completely break it.
I've asked about this on gnupg-users, and have been disabused of
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 01:15:32PM -0600, Mirimir wrote:
What's needed, I think, is challenge-based (as opposed to
reputation-based) proof-of-work that's very difficult to cheat. That
sounds like Bitcoin, doesn't it?
Yes, but a bit more like Hashcash given the usecase:
http://www.hashcash.org/
Derric
thanks.. mr s loses out again i guess
Greg Curcio
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Derric Atzrott
datzr...@alizeepathology.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hey guys how can i communicate with mr S on here to discuss a possible
movie deal in the coming
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Mirimir miri...@riseup.net wrote:
On 10/02/2014 01:24 PM, z9wahqvh wrote:
Even if (for argument's sake) 99% of Tor users/uses were unqualifiedly
evil, that would say nothing about Tor. At most, it would speak to its
relatively slow uptake overall, and perhaps
Torizens, this is a concern troll: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_%
28Internet%29#Concern_troll
They have repeatedly said they support Tor and want to be wrong,
but... and then spread poison.
List administrators, you have dedicated significant resources towards
stopping censorship, and I
On 10/02/2014 04:35 PM, z9wahqvh wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Mirimir miri...@riseup.net wrote:
On 10/02/2014 01:24 PM, z9wahqvh wrote:
Even if (for argument's sake) 99% of Tor users/uses were unqualifiedly
evil, that would say nothing about Tor. At most, it would speak to its
i think roger dingledine presented some short timeline evidence awhile back in
a video i saw but this is from memory.
a US university and the DoJ usa tallied tor traffic on their relay and only
found something like 3% unwanted traffic.
that could have included things like copyrighted music
25 matches
Mail list logo
