Spencer wrote:
Patrick Schleizer:
What are your experiences with OFTC and Tor blocking recently?
The exchange is from early October after a few months of the same -
but only through browsers; clients seem to work fine.
OFTC has been consistently blocking exits and limiting the number of
The OFTC servers have been blocking Tor users for weeks and the #tor is
no longer a viable support channel for anonymous users. We are looking
for other Tor friendly options at the moment and it would be great if
you consider moving your channels too.
Options we are considering for Whonix are
Hi,
Patrick Schleizer:
What are your experiences with OFTC and Tor blocking recently?
See:
https://mailman.boum.org/pipermail/tails-dev/2016-January/009980.html
The exchange is from early October after a few months of the same - but
only through browsers; clients seem to work fine.
Is there a reason why hackint should not be considered?
On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 10:14:13PM +, ban...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> The OFTC servers have been blocking Tor users for weeks and the #tor is no
> longer a viable support channel for anonymous users. We are looking for
> other Tor
Hi,
I:
No it's not!
Have a look for VPSs. There are many and they are very easy to get
over the 'net: paying and setting-up.
Thanks for this and the link :)
Wordlife,
Spencer
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
Metrics portal shows a drop of around half million direct connecting users:
https://metrics.torproject.org/userstats-relay-country.html
Does someone has a good explanation what happened? The top 5 countries show
the same drop. Is this another botnet that got knocked out?
torland
--
tor-talk
Great stuff! Do you plan on bringing back your Onion site? Will there be
a eepsite address for ahmia?
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 03:45:15PM +0200, s7r wrote:
> Altering Tor's path selection is something we shouldn't play with
> until we have concrete papers that suggest it is wrong.
Right.
> Anyway, your suggestion might actually happen automatically along with
> a more important fix, which is AS
- Original message -
From: Nathan of Guardian
To: guardian-...@lists.mayfirst.org
Subject: Orbot v15.1.0 Alpha 1
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 02:04:44 -0500
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Happy 2016... and here's an update for Orbot to test
tor-ad...@torland.me:
> Metrics portal shows a drop of around half million direct connecting users:
>
> https://metrics.torproject.org/userstats-relay-country.html
>
> Does someone has a good explanation what happened? The top 5 countries show
> the same drop. Is this another botnet that got
Hi,
On January 2, 2016 at 10:49 PM Justin wrote:
> I really doubt that 1.5 million bots are using Tor everyday by the way.
The Mevade.A botnet had 4 million bots, which were using Tor in summer
2013. Some links:
This is a feature request for the torbirdy. It would be nice if torbirdy
took control of interval of email box checking and make it random. very
true for that user with many inboxes, so he can avoid mixing into the
same tor nodes. Attacher can match time stamp too!
Thanks!!
--
tor-talk mailing
While Tor may be used for malicious purposes that's an academic issue. Many
people misuse the law to do illegal activities (crooked cops) does that mean we
should abandon all law?
--
Sent from Mail.Ru app for Android Sunday, 03 January 2016, 11:00pm +11:00 from
On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 11:00:21AM +0100, karste...@mailbox.org wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On January 2, 2016 at 10:49 PM Justin wrote:
> > I really doubt that 1.5 million bots are using Tor everyday by the way.
>
> The Mevade.A botnet had 4 million bots, which were using Tor in summer
> 2013. Some links:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Altering Tor's path selection is something we shouldn't play with
until we have concrete papers that suggest it is wrong. As Moritz
said, having a GeoIP database to make path selection changes is
probably a terrible idea, due that such databases are
On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Nurmi, Juha wrote:
> I released refactored new version of Ahmia search engine :)
>
> It's not finished yet but the main parts are working. Be patient, it's far
> from perfect. It has some performance issues etc.
Seems to work well, except for
On 1/3/16 6:52 PM, Nurmi, Juha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I released refactored new version of Ahmia search engine :)
>
> It's not finished yet but the main parts are working. Be patient, it's far
> from perfect. It has some performance issues etc.
>
> Deeper than ever: you can also search i2p network
Hi,
I released refactored new version of Ahmia search engine :)
It's not finished yet but the main parts are working. Be patient, it's far
from perfect. It has some performance issues etc.
Deeper than ever: you can also search i2p network https://ahmia.fi/i2p/
Happy new year 2016!
-Juha
--
What are your experiences with OFTC and Tor blocking recently?
Cheers,
Patrick
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Hi,
Moritz Bartl:
How so?
I take an operational approach and prefer to have physical access;
should've mentioned that up front :(
Well, it's not as clean and simple as it sounds like
Seems like something any operator can, or should, quickly be able to do.
Wordlife,
Spencer
--
On Sunday 03 January 2016 18:52:29 Nurmi, Juha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I released refactored new version of Ahmia search engine :)
>
Thanks. It seems that Ahmia does not like adding hidden services with https
URLs.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
21 matches
Mail list logo