-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/18/2016 07:14 PM, Jon Tullett wrote:
> On 18 July 2016 at 18:15, Spencer
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>>
>>> Jon Tullett: you just asked a user to conduct a risk analysis.
>>>
>>
>> Who else should do it, someone less contextualized to their
>> conte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/18/2016 07:08 PM, Jon Tullett wrote:
> On 18 July 2016 at 16:17, Mirimir wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 07/18/2016 07:33 AM, Jon Tullett wrote:
>>> On 18 July 2016 at 14:57, Mirimir wrote:
-BEGIN PGP
On 7/18/16, Mirimir wrote:
> Anyway, what does Tor Project gain by not mentioning Whonix?
That's a bit sideways, but in the interest of sideways eventually
moving forward...
1) Funding of sorts, which spreads around, to develop TBB, a sizable
prioject, to do decent things a browser should do, ho
i use yahoo to mail with mailinglists but i use TOR to connect to yahoo.
tuns out that all my posts now end up in everyones spam folders.
Is this because the tor exitnodes are used by spammers?
or is every mail that was send from a TOR user falsely marked as spam?
also the subscription confi
On 18 July 2016 at 18:15, Spencer wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>
>> Jon Tullett:
>> you just asked a user to conduct a risk analysis.
>>
>
> Who else should do it, someone less contextualized to their context?
Context matters. Mirimir was asking for what amounts to a very complex
assessment measuring risk in
On 18 July 2016 at 16:17, Mirimir wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/18/2016 07:33 AM, Jon Tullett wrote:
>> On 18 July 2016 at 14:57, Mirimir wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On 07/18/2016 06:11 AM, Jon Tullett wrote:
>>>
Haroo
Hi,
Jon Tullett:
you just asked a user to conduct a risk analysis.
Who else should do it, someone less contextualized to their context?
CIOs can't do an accurate risk assessment
Sux 4 them XD
Wordlife,
Spencer
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 08:39:02AM +0200, Flipchan wrote:
> Hi all ! Im configuring a new debian server
> Can anyone recommend a good dns server?
I assume this is for a Tor relay?
> i Dont want to use my isp default one, i found one that sounded good
> when i read about it uncensoreddns.Org. i
Have a look at the OpenNIC project.
On 07/18/2016 02:39 AM, Flipchan wrote:
> Hi all ! Im configuring a new debian server
> Can anyone recommend a good dns server?
>
>
> i Dont want to use my isp default one, i found one that sounded good when i
> read about it uncensoreddns.Org.
> if anyone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/18/2016 07:33 AM, Jon Tullett wrote:
> On 18 July 2016 at 14:57, Mirimir wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 07/18/2016 06:11 AM, Jon Tullett wrote:
>>
>>> Haroon Meer, who I greatly respect in the security space,
On 18 July 2016 at 14:57, Mirimir wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/18/2016 06:11 AM, Jon Tullett wrote:
>
>> Haroon Meer, who I greatly respect in the security space, describes
>> UX complexity in terms of his mum. As in, "could my mum do this?"
>> and if the answ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/18/2016 06:11 AM, Jon Tullett wrote:
> On 17 July 2016 at 05:11, Mirimir wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 07/16/2016 08:21 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
I'm hardly asking for perfection. Just a little heads up
On 17 July 2016 at 05:11, Mirimir wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/16/2016 08:21 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
>>> I'm hardly asking for perfection. Just a little heads up for the
>>> sheep.
>> You're unwilling to even describe non-technical users as human
>> beings,
On 7/18/16, Flipchan wrote:
> Can anyone recommend a good dns server?
127.0.0.1
::1
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
14 matches
Mail list logo
