On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 04:33:16AM +, Jedd Casella wrote:
> unsubscribe
>[...]
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
These instructions are at the bottom of every
unsubscribe
-Original Message-
From: tor-talk [mailto:tor-talk-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of
Tor-talk
Sent: Tuesday, 13 December 2016 2:49 AM
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: [tor-talk] confusion over verification instructions for build
verification on Mac OS X
On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 12:00:02 +
tor-talk-requ...@lists.torproject.org wrote:
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 21:15:06 +0100
> From: Jonathan Marquardt
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Fedora repo Tor broken?
> Message-ID:
> On 13 Dec 2016, at 01:14, hi...@safe-mail.net wrote:
>
> I was just wondering if you compile Tor on a 64 bit Linux distro, will it
> make a 64 bit executable? Or is it 32 bit only? Would be nice if it had
> supported 64 bit processing.
Tor has full support for x86_64 (it's the preferred
I was just wondering if you compile Tor on a 64 bit Linux distro, will it
make a 64 bit executable? Or is it 32 bit only? Would be nice if it had
supported 64 bit processing.
-Hikki
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
Reading through this:
https://www.torproject.org/docs/verifying-signatures.html.en#BuildVerification
Trying to do this on Mac OS X.
`shasum -a 256 .dmg` clearly gives me a checksum that
doesn't match the one in the "sha256sums-unsigned-build.txt" file. Tried it
with 6.0.6 and 6.0.7.
From what
Hi, all! I just tagged and uploaded Tor 0.2.9.7-rc. The source is
available at the usual place in the website. Other packages should be
available soon. This Tor release will probably go into the hardened
TB series coming out in the next couple of days. (I hear that
0.2.9.6-rc will be in the
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 01:52:22AM -0700, Mirimir wrote:
> Sorry about missing the typo in my initial reply. It _was_ an invalid
> rule. But accepting lo is necessary with default deny, right?
Yes, sorry, you're right. My bad.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To
On 12/12/2016 01:14 AM, Jonathan Marquardt wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:12:54AM -0700, Mirimir wrote:
>> Oops. Sorry. I'm used to straight Tor and Whonix. So how does one lock
>> down Tor using Tor browser?
>
> Well, given the way OP phrased his question, I just assumed he wanted to
>
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:12:54AM -0700, Mirimir wrote:
> Oops. Sorry. I'm used to straight Tor and Whonix. So how does one lock
> down Tor using Tor browser?
Well, given the way OP phrased his question, I just assumed he wanted to
prevent any unwanted input to his system, which is why I gave
10 matches
Mail list logo