> Storing your data in a third party service without end-to-end encryption
> is far worse from a privacy standpoint than not using Tor. I see no
> dichotomy here.
Assuming "grarpamp" does not use a PGP key for sensitive matters, than
yes, you are right.
On Sat, 11 Nov 2017, at 16:05, se...@literati.org wrote:
> Storing your data in a third party service without end-to-end
> encryption is far worse from a privacy standpoint than not using Tor.
> I see no dichotomy here.
You are missing the point. They do not care about privacy. They care
about
On November 11, 2017 5:09:02 AM PST, x9p wrote:
>
>> Google has been an an antiprivacy monetizing asshole
>> denying Tor users access to its search engine nearly
>> every single time, forcing them all to perform slave labor
>> time and time again five or more sets in a row, for no
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 11:16:18PM -0500, grarpamp wrote:
> And just now google threw up a captcha for Youtube.
When using YouTube through Tor, I usually don't get a captcha, but
occasionally I do. I'm using it right now as well. I can see no difference.
It has always been like this. Maybe the
> Google has been an an antiprivacy monetizing asshole
> denying Tor users access to its search engine nearly
> every single time, forcing them all to perform slave labor
> time and time again five or more sets in a row, for no good
> reason, and further often outright failing to let them pass
>
On 11/11/17, Anders Andersson wrote:
> This is what has stopped me from spending any money on a new CPU from
> Intel or AMD the past years. Sadly, I don't have a practical
Yes, I miss the Speccy and big Alpha Server
https://goo.gl/CzCpDG
But I want to tell mine joke.
Mr.
On 11/11/17, grarpamp wrote:
> denying Tor users access to its search engine nearly
That may be the result of the wrecking of the specials to impede the
existence of the Tor. I noticed that when I forbid nodes with
suspicious behavior, I have to torment the captcha much less