...@cyblings.on.ca wrote:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 4:44 PM, AK aka...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I was expecting you to ask something like that :). Well for now it just
an
alpha version, so I would not count on it for robust security. In fact,
security is not the main focus of this project (unlike Tails
on
ease of use and privacy, rather than bulletproof security. If there is
enough interest, I will make a formal document outlining the model, since I
have been asked this before.
Cheers
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 2:33 PM, intrigeri intrig...@boum.org wrote:
Hi,
AK wrote (30 Mar 2014 20:14:06 GMT
That's why I'm setting up my own mail server at home. And also plan to
access it via web interface if using someone else's machine (like at
home). I would only allow web access via SSL and password, and only
show the emails of the last week (not more). Trying postfix, dovecot,
and SquirrelMail.
edit: someone one's else machine *like at work
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 6:18 PM, AK aka...@gmail.com wrote:
That's why I'm setting up my own mail server at home. And also plan to
access it via web interface if using someone else's machine (like at
home). I would only allow web access via SSL
Ya I know, I'm also disappointed that Torbutton stopped supporting the
latest Firefox. But, I have tried the JonDoFox[1] profile (with Tor
proxy), and it seems to work well. If anyone knows of any serious
security vulnerabilities for using this tool, please let me know :)
, intrigeri intrig...@boum.org wrote:
Hi,
AK wrote (31 May 2012 14:00:17 GMT) :
From what I tested, no security feature is broken.
Great.
It's meant to easily allow people to try Tails, an if they like it
and they want the official version, they can go to the Tails website
and download the latest
The clock is fine on Pirate Linux. I've been writing my emails with
another OS, and now I think I fixed it :)
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Pascal pascal...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Looks like the first bug you need to fix is with NTP. Your clock is not
even close to right.
-Pascal
I'm not sure about Windows,
But this seems to work for me in Linux:
vidalia --datadir datadir
Before you run this, put the files torrc, vidalia.conf, geoip into datadir
torrc:
AvoidDiskWrites 1
Log notice stdout
SocksPort 9050
SocksListenAddress 127.0.0.1
ControlPort 9051
DataDirectory
I think this should work:
1) Remove the lines:
BrowserDirectory=.
BrowserExecutable=firefox
from Data/Vidalia/vidalia.conf
2) Add the line
SocksPort 9050
to Data/Tor/torrc
3)./App/Firefox/firefox -P no-remote
and create and run a new profile with Data/profile as the directory
On Mon, Apr
I think Ghostery + Adblock Plus + No Script is overkill. Choose one. They
all pretty much do the same thing. Block nasty javascript. No Script seems
appropriate for the Tor Browser due to it's default aggressive stance on
any javascript.
But just curious, which part of Ghostery is closed source,
As far as I know, Aurora is based on something called Firefox Portable.
Last time I checked, this thing isn't even open source. Can someone clarify
this? Or should I open a new thread?
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Geoff Down geoffd...@fastmail.net wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012, at 09:50 AM,
28, 2012 at 1:04 AM, AK aka...@gmail.com wrote:
As far as I know, Aurora is based on something called Firefox Portable.
Last time I checked, this thing isn't even open source. Can someone
clarify
this? Or should I open a new thread?
Aurora is a brand-less version of Firefox. It is considered
and...@torproject.orgwrote:
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:16:05 -0700
AK aka...@gmail.com wrote:
So are you telling me that standard Firefox depends on closed source
binaries as well? I don't care about how free the license is. I'm
talking about whether it can be built completely from source code.
I suggest
It's not meant to be lightweight. It's meant to be a general purpose system
that one would install on a hard drive, with a balance between privacy and
usability, as well as various options for increasing or decreasing privacy
based on personal needs. I want to eventually target newcomers to Linux.
on one DVD, and will basically be a showcase of what
our Party views as freedom.
Of course, this is still in the building/testing phase, so the plans might
change.
Andrew.
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 10:31 AM, intrigeri intrig...@boum.org wrote:
Hi,
AK wrote (05 Aug 2011 01:44:05 GMT) :
Soon we
Ya its not just the Live CD aspect of it. But also, people aren't going to
use Tor 24/7. So if all internet traffic goes through Tor, that could turn
away users from using it day to day. But I don't know, I haven't tried Tails
since a few months ago so maybe there are some new features I'm unaware
Ya but people also like to stream movies, download torrents, video chat. So
I'm not sure if Tor performs well enough for doing those things.
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 3:53 PM, and...@torproject.org wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 02:38:37PM -0600, aka...@gmail.com wrote 4.4K
bytes in 107 lines
the sources and give reviews and you will know
that those reviews actually correspond to what is running on your system.
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:18 PM, AK aka...@gmail.com wrote:
I know, you still have to trust the standard Ubuntu programs such as gcc
firefox. But, you already made
18 matches
Mail list logo