On 6/29/2014 2:56 AM, C B wrote:
It is really pretty annoying to be surfing along and suddenly get a Unable to
connect
Firefox can't establish a connection to the server message. Right now I am stuck on 188.226.249.138 as I have been many times before.
In ten minutes I will be re-assigned a
On 6/29/2014 1:22 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 09:38:05PM +, williamwin...@openmailbox.org wrote:
I don't understand what Schneier means by this:
After identifying an individual Tor user on the internet, the NSA
uses its network of secret internet servers to
On 6/28/2014 4:54 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 01:27:50PM -0500, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
Hardware acceleration is unchecked by default it Torbrowser.
Other than some machines might not support it, is there a reason not
to enabled it?
Some fingerprinting or other issue
On 6/28/2014 2:16 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:30:19AM -0700, Bobby Brewster wrote:
However, I'm wondering if this is the best way or is Vidalia now deprecated?
It is now deprecated. It has been unsupported for years. :(
On 6/28/2014 6:36 PM, Seth David Schoen wrote:
williamwin...@openmailbox.org writes:
I don't understand what Schneier means by this:
After identifying an individual Tor user on the internet, the NSA
uses its network of secret internet servers to redirect those users
to another set of secret
On 6/27/2014 6:26 AM, Bobby Brewster wrote:
/What is to stop someone from setting up an exit node and a) sniffing all
traffic or specifically non-SSL usernames and passwords and b) using SSLStrip
to access SSL usernames and passwords?/
Nothing, if they're not encrypted. Common precaution is
Hardware acceleration is unchecked by default it Torbrowser.
Other than some machines might not support it, is there a reason not to
enabled it?
Some fingerprinting or other issue?
The dev manual (stable) just has this to say:
*/HardwareAccel* *0*|*1*
If non-zero, try to use built-in
On 6/26/2014 1:34 PM, Bobby Brewster wrote:
/Let's say I download a PDF with Tor. I get the warning that I might download
it outside Tor./
That used to be the norm, but I believe the message was changed in later
TB versions. Which version are you using?
I'm not sure I've seen that warning
On 6/25/2014 3:28 PM, Mark McCarron wrote:
I have been examining the number of what would normally be deemed as illegal
sites sites on Tor. Eliminating the narcotics trade, as these tend to be
intelligence agency backed enterprises, a serious decline has been noted across
the board.
This
On 6/25/2014 4:56 PM, Mark McCarron wrote:
Basically, I keep a track of site numbers year-on-year, site availability from
3rd party monitoring and read comments on forums and chat. From what I can
gather, most of these sites were suspected of being honeypots due to their
tendency to remove
On 6/23/2014 2:57 PM, Jeremy Rand wrote:
On 06/23/2014 12:11 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
I noticed there are at least 2 different references in Torbrowser for
useragent over ride strings.
The Panopticlick site picks up this one: /Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/24.0
On 6/19/2014 1:51 PM, Georg Koppen wrote:
Joe Btfsplk:
Curious: Should DOM storage really be enabled by default in Tor Browser
3.6.x, when other forms of disk storage are disabled?
DOM Storage in Tor Browser does not save state to disc. And it is bound
to the URL bar domain (see design
On 6/20/2014 9:04 AM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
On 6/19/2014 1:51 PM, Georg Koppen wrote:
Joe Btfsplk:
Curious: Should DOM storage really be enabled by default in Tor Browser
3.6.x, when other forms of disk storage are disabled?
DOM Storage in Tor Browser does not save state to disc
19/06/2014 18:15, Joe Btfsplk a écrit :
Curious: Should DOM storage really be enabled by default in Tor
Browser 3.6.x, when other forms of disk storage are disabled?
If so, why is that?
Thanks. I'm sure many would enjoy hearing from those directly involved
w/ TorBrowser, or that consider
On 6/19/2014 1:51 PM, Georg Koppen wrote:
Joe Btfsplk:
Curious: Should DOM storage really be enabled by default in Tor Browser
3.6.x, when other forms of disk storage are disabled?
DOM Storage in Tor Browser does not save state to disc. And it is bound
to the URL bar domain (see design
most people (not suffering from something) really care
if it's Tor, TOR, tOR, tOr...
And newer people coming in may think it a bit strange to make a serious
point, to not spelling it correctly, per widely accepted, international
convention. :D
My name's not Joe, it's jOe. On rEmUlak, only
On 6/18/2014 1:03 AM, Артур Истомин wrote:
Are you saying you have Flash processes running under Fx (not TBB)?
1) Did you use Flash player in Fx, that would have started them, or do you
not know what started them?
/It was started after visiting https://helpx.adobe.com/flash-player.html
and
, or if determine if TBB, or Flash, is calling the 2 files to start?
Even though _no Flash vids are ever played_. Below - Some additional
replies to previous comments.
On 6/16/2014 7:38 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
On 6/16/2014 7:02 PM, krishna e bera wrote:
On 14-06-16 03:17 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
In at least
On 6/17/2014 12:33 PM, Артур Истомин wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:23:53AM -0500, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
I'd still really like some help on finding what calls / causes the 2 flash
.exe files to start in background.
They're ALWAYS shown by Process Explorer, in the *same process tree -
directly
In at least the last couple TBB versions, or longer, I've found
FlashPlayerPlugin_x.x.exe (latest *13_0_0_214.exe) running in background
- numerous times.
Actually, 2 instances of flash exe files are always shown running.
Biggest question is, what is Flash doing to Tor anonymity in these
On 6/16/2014 7:02 PM, krishna e bera wrote:
On 14-06-16 03:17 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
In at least the last couple TBB versions, or longer, I've found
FlashPlayerPlugin_x.x.exe (latest *13_0_0_214.exe) running in background
- numerous times.
Actually, 2 instances of flash exe files are always
On 6/14/2014 10:40 PM, Andrew Lewman wrote:
On 06/14/2014 03:21 AM, Sebastian G. bastik.tor wrote:
That has to be a violation of your rights.
It's the law in the USA. Regardless of how one feels about it, it's
currently against the law.
The citizen resided in a country as listed as a State
On 6/15/2014 2:08 PM, Mirimir wrote:
The law is the law, and (acting openly) the choices are compliance, or
noncompliance on principle. But see above.
No, the law is often temporary, until someone has the guts to stand up
(100's, maybe 1000's of times, in the last 150 yrs, in U.S. alone).
This
On 6/14/2014 12:51 AM, grarpamp wrote:
If other sites are loading similarly slow it may be possible to find
out why or what is being used to do it. *CL never replies to support
queries.*
I have found answers to Craigslist issues on their users forum -
sometimes direct replies to my post. The
On 6/14/2014 2:21 AM, Sebastian G. bastik.tor wrote:
Andrew wrote:
# Highlights
(...)
- Looked into legality of receiving a large financial donation from a
country on the US Treasury embargoed list. Unsurprisingly, we cannot
accept such a donation due to the source.
That has to be a
On 6/14/2014 4:30 AM, Chen Cecilia Zhang wrote:
Thanks for the reply. I meant doing everything through Tor browser
write an email but set the sending date as 1 month later. Then closed the
Tor browser.
Just wonder if the email send automatically by itself 1 month later, the IP
is still
On 6/14/2014 6:33 AM, Chen Cecilia Zhang wrote:
and the strange thing is : I tried to test the email sending from Tor and
without Tor browser, and the IP address shows in the original email from
gmail are the same
Will anyone help explain how come? thansks
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 4:22 AM,
On 6/14/2014 12:32 PM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
On 06/14/2014 01:33 PM, Chen Cecilia Zhang wrote:
and the strange thing is : I tried to test the email sending from Tor and
without Tor browser, and the IP address shows in the original email from
gmail are the same
How would you think Gmail (as
On 6/14/2014 5:07 PM, grarpamp wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Joe Btfsplk joebtfs...@gmx.com wrote:
I have found answers to Craigslist issues on their users forum - sometimes
direct replies to my post. The more technical aspects of this issue may be
beyond many users' knowledge
On 6/14/2014 4:26 PM, grarpamp wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Joe Btfsplk joebtfs...@gmx.com wrote:
Using webmail vs. an email client (like Thunderbird) may not be as
convenient, but eliminating the client means one less thing that could
possibly compromise anonymity.
First
On 6/14/2014 5:50 PM, krishna e bera wrote:
On 14-06-14 01:00 PM, Collin Anderson wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Joe Btfsplk joebtfs...@gmx.com wrote:
I'm not a legal or embargo rules expert, but I wonder if an embargoed
country or individuals in it, giving money to a non-profit
On 6/14/2014 7:56 PM, Mirimir wrote:
On 06/14/2014 06:29 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
SNIP
It's OK for an organization dedicated to providing anonymity to protect
users - everywhere, in no small part from various gov't agencies, to
take major funding from... a gov't agency. Yet, that organization
On 6/11/2014 12:50 AM, Mirimir wrote:
Yes indeed. So why doesn't TBB include AdBlock? In my experience,
unlike NoScript, AdBlock Plus rarely breaks sites. Reductions in site
loading time are dramatic. And then there's the privacy benefit.
The reason given in the past by Tor Project leaders,
On 6/10/2014 2:27 PM, Antonio Z wrote:
I did not think that Adblock was trustable considering how an
extension can bypass Tor.
Good question. I've never sniffed ABP activities to see what it does
when installed in TBB. From memory, it shouldn't be phoning home,
except to get updates. Don't
On 6/2/2014 1:49 PM, SecTech wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
The TBB with TorButton has the ability to delete all cookies.
Than the site can't track you, but you can enable first party cookies.
SecTech
AFAIK, Torbutton doesn't have the ability to delete 1st party
On 5/30/2014 2:11 AM, Mike Cardwell wrote:
* on the Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:40:24PM -0400, Michael Wolf wrote:
Anyone else noticing slashdot, google, and a few
other big ones i can't recall, now throwing annoying
popups with 'hey, we're using cookies, click to agree
to this' ? What new legal
On 5/30/2014 12:58 PM, Mike Cardwell wrote:
* on the Fri, May 30, 2014 at 09:32:15AM -0500, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
Myself and a few other people have been slowly building an Adblock
filter list to remove these cookie warnings from sites for about 2
years now:
That's good, but how will blocking
On 5/29/2014 8:18 PM, grarpamp wrote:
Anyone else noticing slashdot, google, and a few
other big ones i can't recall, now throwing annoying
popups with 'hey, we're using cookies, click to agree
to this' ? What new legal groupthink bs is behind this?
I don't use gobble, but I've noticed a few
On 5/27/2014 2:10 AM, Aymeric Vitte wrote:
Le 26/05/2014 22:24, Joe Btfsplk a écrit :
I haven't done testing to see what identifying data might be revealed
(if any) by this, but for Youtube ( some others), if you copy the vid
URL, even though Flash isn't active, then paste into VLC, SMPlayer
On 5/27/2014 12:34 PM, Aymeric Vitte wrote:
Le 27/05/2014 16:45, Joe Btfsplk a écrit :
I assume those settings would keep VLC inside Tor network
Yes, unless VLC fails to proxy everything to the socks proxy
, but haven't confirmed it. VLC devs would know. If it doesn't, it's
probably a bug
On 5/27/2014 1:02 PM, Aymeric Vitte wrote:
Correction: I had something else open during the test, apparently VLC
does proxy correctly the requests.
OK, good to know. I may ask on VLC forum if others have checked this,
just to get feedback - though I doubt a large % use it like that.
--
On 5/26/2014 2:15 PM, Charles Thomas wrote:
For me, running the most recent version of TBB on Ubuntu 14.04, I can
stream videos from Youtube fine. I just have to temporarily allow all
the page then refresh, then repeat again. It streams, slowly, but it
does stream.
On 05/26/2014 05:00 AM,
On 5/21/2014 7:41 AM, krishna e bera wrote:
A recent EFF report [0] purports to show that many companies are
becoming more proactive in defence of internet users' privacy. It rates
companies on how well they protect data from government requests. This
makes some of these companies *such as
On 5/18/2014 9:54 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
And your intuition might be (mine was) that removing those small
relays really harms diversity (and thus anonymity), but actually,
Tor's load balancing and path selection means those relays are very
rarely chosen anyway, so they don't contribute
On 5/19/2014 1:26 PM, Akater wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Some people think the only valid / conceivable form
of community / comms on the net are 'forums'.
Well, they're free to set one up.
No pro-forum argument, but one can see why someone would prefer forums
to
On 4/23/2014 10:48 AM, s...@sky-ip.org wrote:
On 4/23/2014 5:58 PM, Ted Jackson wrote:
I would like to change to an US Ip address when I want to?
possible?
You can set a static exit node in your torrc but that is not
recommended at all as it will have impact on your anonymity.
Follow up to
On 4/10/2014 3:16 AM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) wrote:
Hi,
are we really sure that the private keys are being compromised due to
the heartbleed attack?
I see many people upgrading, that's OK, but then i see many people
changing private keys.
I read here that's very unlikley that a private key
On 4/10/2014 3:44 PM, Christopher J. Walters wrote:
Since I am neither an expert on OpenSSL nor TOR, let's get one question out of
the way before anything further is said on the topic: Does TOR actually use
potentially vulnerable versions of OpenSSL (or use it at all, for that matter)?
Should
On 4/9/2014 4:52 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 09:32:08AM +, antispa...@sent.at wrote:
I downloaded the right archive and overwrote the existing folder
(3.5.3). Restarted and the yellow triangle is still there. On the upper
right corner it's written 3.5.4, yet the
On 4/8/2014 5:24 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
On 4/8/2014 4:25 PM, grarpamp wrote:
https://blog.torproject.org/ covers what to do for Tor things.
For everything else on the net, fix the clients and servers you're
responsible for. Then...
You're right, there's a big gotcha in all this, users won't
On 4/9/2014 12:36 PM, Andrew F wrote:
Would be interesting if someone created an app to test for the problem and
then published which big websites are slow to upgrade.
that would certainly be good for consumers.
Well, one website sorta has. They seem to have more extensive testing
for overall
On 4/9/2014 11:21 AM, s...@sky-ip.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I have upgraded to latest Tor Browser Bundle version: 3.5.4 - Windows
32 bit.
My operating system is Windows 8.1 Pro Enterprise, 64 bit.
The odd things i have noticed (which didn't happen in
On 4/9/2014 1:29 PM, Christopher J. Walters wrote:
It seems no one wants to talk or hear about this issue. It is not
being reported on media sites or anywhere else, other than the
Heartbleed site, and the OpenSSL lists
It's all over the internet, when I look in Ixquick / Startpage.
Possible
On 4/7/2014 6:14 PM, grarpamp wrote:
http://heartbleed.com/
The Heartbleed Bug is a serious vulnerability in the popular OpenSSL
cryptographic software library. This weakness allows stealing the
information protected, under normal conditions, by the SSL/TLS encryption
used to secure the
On 4/5/2014 4:20 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
I noticed the Torbuttion icon - to the L of address / URL box,
disappeared sometime after last getting a new identity via Torbutton.
Other than reinstalling the browser, any ideas how to get the icon
back (even if I have to hack a file, like w/ resource
On 4/6/2014 6:45 PM, Gerardus Hendricks wrote:
On 4/5/14 11:20 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
Other than reinstalling the browser, any ideas how to get the icon
back (even if I have to hack a file, like w/ resource hacker, etc)?
Go to View - Toolbars - Customize and drag it back onto the toolbar
I noticed the Torbuttion icon - to the L of address / URL box,
disappeared sometime after last getting a new identity via Torbutton.
Other than reinstalling the browser, any ideas how to get the icon
back (even if I have to hack a file, like w/ resource hacker, etc)?
Not sure if it
On 3/31/2014 4:12 PM, Jann Horn wrote:
Well, the subject line pretty much says it all: Lots of Tor relays send out
globally sequential IP IDs, which, as far as I know, allows a remote party to
measure how fast the relay is sending out IP packets with high precision,
possibly making statistical
On 3/20/2014 12:47 PM, Patrick Schleizer wrote:
Joe Btfsplk:
1) I doubt you'll be able to run 1 instance of TBB - at once - if
that's part of what you want.
Others can correct me, if wrong.
This is possible. Simpler since TBB 3.x. Although undocumented. Bits can
be found here:
- https
volgende geschreven:
And how do I create in torbrowser different profiles, I still don't understand
it..
Op 14 mrt. 2014 om 18:11 heeft Joe Btfsplk joebtfs...@gmx.com het volgende
geschreven:
It probably won't allow 2 instances of Firefox (TBB) running at once.
You may be able to use
It probably won't allow 2 instances of Firefox (TBB) running at once.
You may be able to use the stand alone profile mgr for Firefox
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Profile_Manager
You'd have to add an entry in the profile mgr, to the location of TBB
(firefox.exe). So you can
On 3/14/2014 4:57 PM, muhammed gokce wrote:
And how do I create in torbrowser different profiles, I still don't understand
it..
Please go to the MDN (mozilla) link I gave. Like anything, there's some
reading on how to use the profile manager, but it's child's play
compared to using a
On 3/10/2014 1:43 PM, Gordon Morehouse wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi there,
I have been doing some testing of sending email over Tor and today ran
into a definite BadExit (but not flagged, clearly) because there was a
blatant MitM attempt on three separate occasions
The only comments I've seen about using Vidalia 0.2.21 - Win (the stand
alone package) w/ TBB 3.5.x, to see the map connections, is just
install / extract it to its own folder start it after TBB is already
running.
Like falling off a log? That doesn't work for me. Perhaps because I
don't
On 3/6/2014 1:59 AM, Georg Koppen wrote:
Joe Btfsplk:
But, EVEN WHEN I reset my system to 96 DPI, reboot - TBB still shows a
weird value - like 1920 x *933* (just an example).
NO one has a screen size w/ those odd numbers. That's the issue.
Yes, they should be a multiple of 200 x 100
/2014 8:21 AM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
On 3/6/2014 1:59 AM, Georg Koppen wrote:
Joe Btfsplk:
But, EVEN WHEN I reset my system to 96 DPI, reboot - TBB still shows a
weird value - like 1920 x *933* (just an example).
NO one has a screen size w/ those odd numbers. That's the issue.
Yes, they should
I'm sure I recently checked what screen size TBB (Windows) was giving
out. Which ever version I checked it in, test sites did NOT show my
actual monitor size.
Now, in TBB 3.5.2, my actual screen size seems to show on several
browser test sites.
Even extracted TBB again, into clean folder
On 3/5/2014 7:52 PM, Soul Plane wrote:
I tried TBB 3.5.2 in Windows XP at 120 dpi and browserspy says I'm at 96.
Yes, that's screen resolution, or just resolution. It's of some
significance, but it's not the same as screen (or monitor) size.
Screen size is what I meant (like 1280 x 720, etc.).
On https://Unseen.is, the page(s) that would normally come after
entering user name PW is blocked.
Instead, submitting login data page refreshes, I just see a blank
web page w/ a throbber in middle of page.
Same thing happens when creating a free acct - at top of page at address
in above
On 2/28/2014 11:25 AM, Edgar S wrote:
I've complained here before that the remember password feature in some
long previous versions of Tor Browser no longer works. I've accepted it
will likely never come back. So I've found the following solution. Maybe
it will also work for others, discussion
On 2/7/2014 12:42 PM, Matthew Finkel wrote:
This is in re: Hulu (whis is presumably authenticated)... but really,
it applies to any service which we, the legitimate users of Tor,
are denied access to.
It has simply gone too far and we should be putting effort into
reversing this trend by
On 6 February 2014 04:03, Joe Btfsplk joebtfs...@gmx.com wrote:
You don't have any (non-default) extensions or plugins? Sometimes they mess
w/ things.
Other than that one change, did you make any others?
Wondering if a file got corrupted?
One easy thing is just reinstall TBB. Erase old files
On 2/6/2014 6:21 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
Other than checking some sites looking at the cookies file (using an
editor) to see if it is / isn't allowing any cookies - of any type, we
have no way of knowing if this is just a UI bug, or if settings really
get messed up internally. Can others
On 2/5/2014 4:36 PM, David Balažic wrote:
On 5 February 2014 06:44, Joe Btfsplk joebtfs...@gmx.com wrote:
On 2/4/2014 3:02 PM, David Balažic wrote:
I use TBB 3.5.1 (win32)
Trying to delete some specific cookies, in the preferences I selected
Remember History on the Privacy tabs, to gain access
On 2/4/2014 3:02 PM, David Balažic wrote:
I use TBB 3.5.1 (win32)
Trying to delete some specific cookies, in the preferences I selected
Remember History on the Privacy tabs, to gain access to the Show
cookies button.
Unexpectedly that required a restart of TBB.
As that wiped out all cookies
Should Tor-talk change names to something like Torbook.com or Tor-match.com?
Tor-talk possibly ? should not be used to plan dinner dates such, that
has NOTHING to do w/ Tor, anonymity, privacy, computer safety, internet
news practices nor even tongue in cheek comments specifically ABOUT
On 1/31/2014 8:00 AM, Olivier Cornu wrote:
Le 31/01/2014 01:18, Joe Btfsplk a écrit :
On 1/30/2014 9:22 AM, Sukhoi wrote:
In fact, I am worried with the Wireless Position System developed by
google and others, and the introduction in the browsers, like firefox, a
way to track which wireless
test sites would show that.
If not, it appears that changing font name size under Options
Content to increase small text, provides LESS browser characteristics
than using Ctrl + mouse scroll to zoom screen size.
On 1/29/2014 10:31 AM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
People having excellent sight
On 1/31/2014 11:24 AM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
On 01/31/2014 04:32 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
Is it known that sites CAN detect selected TBB *browser* font names
sizes?
See 4.6.4 in the Tor Browser design document:
https://www.torproject.org/projects/torbrowser/design/#fingerprinting-linkability
On 1/30/2014 9:22 AM, Sukhoi wrote:
In fact, I am worried with the Wireless Position System developed by
google and others, and the introduction in the browsers, like firefox, a
way to track which wireless networks the computer can see in a given
moment. Based on that they identify the user
People having excellent sight naturally don't think about reading small
print books or web pages.
But a lot of the general population has a problem with this.
Because of possible browser fingerprinting issues / or anonymity
leaks, TBB users are discouraged from
- changing default settings in
On 1/29/2014 7:05 AM, Kristov Atlas wrote:
Then the button should read change exit node and not new identity, no?
On Jan 27, 2014, at 22:02, Michael Wolf mikewol...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/26/2014 5:57 AM, Lunar wrote:
Katya Titov:
New Identity works from both TBB and Vidalia. The difference
On 1/28/2014 4:34 AM, Rick wrote:
On 01/27/2014 10:49 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
On 1/27/2014 9:02 PM, Michael Wolf wrote:
At this time, using Vidalia is the only way to change exit nodes
without losing all your tabs, or to see which exit node is
misbehaving. It would be really useful to be able
On 1/26/2014 10:03 PM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
On 01/26/2014 08:42 PM, Al Billings wrote:
What is the bug number?
https://grepular.com/Security_Bug_Thunderbird_Websites_Tabs
The bugzilla report is currently locked from being viewed, but for when
it becomes unlocked, here it is: bug 700979
On 1/27/2014 3:41 AM, Georg Koppen wrote:
Joe Btfsplk:
TBB 3.5 for Win is starting in half screen the UI sizing buttons are
hidden because the TBB UI is shifted where the size buttons are off the
monitor.
So is most of the title bar, making it hard to drag the UI down to reach
buttons. Once
On 1/26/2014 7:14 PM, Al Jigong Billings wrote:
Like I said, Thunderbird doesn't allow for pages to open in tabs without an
extension. So., if you have reliable repro steps, it is a bug that should
be fixed and I can push on it to get it addressed.
Unless I can get one of the specially crafted
On 1/27/2014 9:02 PM, Michael Wolf wrote:
At this time, using Vidalia is the only way to change exit nodes
without losing all your tabs, or to see which exit node is
misbehaving. It would be really useful to be able to change exit nodes
without Vidalia, even if this function is hidden
Nils wrote:
You can use the windows key + an arrow key to resize and move windows.
DOESN'T work on my machine in Vista x64 (for any app). No effect. Maybe
some Windows option turned off?
On 1/26/2014 12:56 AM, Lars Luthman wrote:
On Sat, 2014-01-25 at 21:37 -0600, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
Re
On 1/26/2014 11:33 AM, Andrew F wrote:
YIKES... Are you sure, how did this slip by?
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Mike Cardwell t...@lists.grepular.comwrote:
I just blogged about a general security issue in Thunderbird which may
also affect people who are using Tor:
On 1/26/2014 1:15 PM, Al Billings wrote:
Assuming we’re talking about people opening web pages in TB tabs, that normally
can only happen if someone installs Thunderbrowse or a similar extension. By
default, TB doesn’t render web pages.
I thought the same thing. I'm pretty sure I've had links
On 1/25/2014 7:33 AM, Katya Titov wrote:
TT Security:
1. So Network Map and New Identity are absent now. When these
functions will be add to the TBB?
Vidalia is now a stand-alone package. Details:
https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq#WhereDidVidaliaGo
If TBB is leaving Vidalia for a better ?
TBB 3.5 for Win is starting in half screen the UI sizing buttons are
hidden because the TBB UI is shifted where the size buttons are off the
monitor.
So is most of the title bar, making it hard to drag the UI down to reach
buttons. Once maximized, it fits fine on the monitor.
Finally got it
2014-01-26 Joe Btfsplk joebtfs...@gmx.com
TBB 3.5 for Win is starting in half screen the UI sizing buttons are
hidden because the TBB UI is shifted where the size buttons are off the
monitor.
So is most of the title bar, making it hard to drag the UI down to reach
buttons. Once maximized
On 1/25/2014 5:07 PM, Lunar wrote:
Joe Btfsplk:
I missed the memo on all reasons why Vidalia - bad, Tor Launcher -
good.
At least:
http://users.encs.concordia.ca/~clark/papers/2007_soups.pdf
http://petsymposium.org/2012/papers/hotpets12-1-usability.pdf
and Vidalia has no maintainers
On 1/23/2014 5:12 PM, Mirimir wrote:
I wouldn't run VMs on Windows with any expectation of privacy. Only a
year or so ago, shellbags were not common knowledge. Only the forensic
community and hard-core black hat types knew about them. It's arguable
that many similar features in Windows remain
As TBB is a standard product, its fingerprint should be the same for
everyone.
Tell that to the guy that got arrested on campus, because he was one of
a few people using it.
People talk a good game in an armchair quarterback sort of way - if
he'd only... Unless they're seasoned veterans at
On 11/30/2013 2:30 PM, Rejo Zenger wrote:
See: http://issuu.com/pimvandendool/docs/document03. New document,
(really) briefly mentioning the efforts of the Dutch intelligence
services identifying Tor-users. Attempts are made by hacking into
servers running fora, obtaining the logfiles,
On 11/29/2013 10:47 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
http://www.technologyreview.com/news/521856/group-thinks-anonymity-should-be-baked-into-the-internet-itself/
Group Thinks Anonymity Should Be Baked Into the Internet Itself
Good one.
Not aimed at anyone, but along same line of thought - with about as
On 11/23/2013 3:04 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
On 11/23/2013 2:16 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 07:42:23AM +0200, Sherief Alaa wrote:
I just see the options StrictExitNodes and StrictEntryNodes is deprecated?
The correct syntax is:
EntryNodes {node, node, ...}
StrictNodes 0
On 11/25/2013 7:14 AM, Leo Unglaub wrote:
the solution is simple. DONT USE THOSE FUCKED UP SERVICES. Use email
providers that allow an authentication from anywhere like every
provider is supposed to do.
Greetings
Leo
It's not only F'g email that won't allow from some *-stan or African
201 - 300 of 567 matches
Mail list logo
