Re: [tor-talk] Possibly Smart, Possibly Stupid, Idea Regarding Tor & Linux Distributions

Hi Alec, > On 04 Jan 2017, at 12:24, Alec Muffett wrote: > > Actually, I don't believe that you do disagree with the problem statement > :-) > > I believe that you may concerns with one of my proposed solutions to the > problem, and that's okay because I do too. :-) >

Re: [tor-talk] Possibly Smart, Possibly Stupid, Idea Regarding Tor & Linux Distributions

Hi Alec, thanks for your thoughts. I have just one very quick comment, but it seems you haven't addressed it yet: > On 03 Jan 2017, at 03:04, Alec Muffett wrote: > > Where I feel that issues arise are in the older Ubuntus and Debians. > > Again, I understand that there

Re: [tor-talk] 33c3 and tor?

Hi, > On 20 Dec 2016, at 14:37, fatal wrote: > an early version of the fahrplan for 33c3 is released¹ (btw. also the > 33c3 app on f-droid is already available). > > I couldn't find any talks from the tor-project yet, but maybe I've > overlooked them? Will there be any? > >

Re: [tor-talk] Is Tor 32 bit only?

> On 13 Dec 2016, at 01:14, hi...@safe-mail.net wrote: > > I was just wondering if you compile Tor on a 64 bit Linux distro, will it > make a 64 bit executable? Or is it 32 bit only? Would be nice if it had > supported 64 bit processing. Tor has full support for x86_64 (it's the preferred

Re: [tor-talk] Is it possible to get a Node-Chain with 3 nodes from ONE country?

> On 21 Mar 2016, at 08:27, Ben Stover wrote: > > Is it possible to get a Node-Chain with 3 nodes from ONE country? Yes. -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to

Re: [tor-talk] Directory problems?

> On 18 Mar 2016, at 15:17, Sebastian Niehaus > wrote: > Am 18.03.2016 um 14:11 schrieb tor_t...@arcor.de: > >> then start connect to tor. Also you can open AdvOR.ini and this to [torrc] >> section. > > If there are problems with multiple authorities there might

[tor-talk] Invalid consensus today

Hi there, different threads on this list have already begun popping up about today's 0700 UTC consensus. The reason is that the dirauths did not produce a consensus that was signed by all 9, but rather the vote was split (this happens sometimes and usually causes no great concern). The dirauth

Re: [tor-talk] Does Facebook Onion Work?

> On 17 Feb 2016, at 22:15, David Goulet <dgou...@ev0ke.net> wrote: > On 17 Feb (22:10:44), Sebastian Hahn wrote: >>> On 17 Feb 2016, at 21:17, blo...@openmailbox.org wrote: >>> Does Facebook still provide an onion link? >>> >>> Because I've tri

Re: [tor-talk] Does Facebook Onion Work?

Hi blobby, > On 17 Feb 2016, at 21:17, blo...@openmailbox.org wrote: > Does Facebook still provide an onion link? > > Because I've tried https://www.facebookcorewwwi.onion/ and I get a > neverending loop in which the site loads and loads and loads... > > Any ideas? the correct address is

Re: [tor-talk] #nottor

> On 03 Dec 2015, at 08:30, Andreas Krey wrote: > > On Wed, 02 Dec 2015 17:32:22 +, coderman wrote: > ... >> the collective defect identification efforts in real-time have moved >> to channel #nottor. > > Speaking of which - what's up with #tor and #nottor. > > I'm using

Re: [tor-talk] tor --verify-config opens listeners? (for short timeframe)

On 23 Feb 2015, at 23:33, Nusenu nus...@openmailbox.org wrote: I stumpled on this while debugging an ansible role. It basically does this: tor --verify-config -f foo.torrc tor -f foo.torrc while the torrc is fine and the first tor execution retuns 0 the second one will *sometimes* fail

[tor-talk] Removal of Vidalia content from our website

Hi tor-talk, we have stopped updating our Vidalia bundles a long time ago, today I've removed the download links and related documentation from the Website. At this time, Vidalia has been unmaintained for too long to be a recommended solution. Cheers Sebastian signature.asc Description:

Re: [tor-talk] Tor and solidarity against online harassment

On 14 Dec 2014, at 07:06, Mirimir miri...@riseup.net wrote: Is https://blog.torproject.org down? http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/blog.torproject.org = yes DDoS? It's up intermittently. I'd suspect ddos atm, yes. Cheers Sebastian -- tor-talk mailing list -

[tor-talk] Replacing a dirauth: Welcome longclaw

Hi there, after many years of service Mike Perry is retiring his dirauth, turtles. It hasn't been functional for some time, so we decided to add a new dirauth to replace it. The new dirauth will be hosted by Micah Anderson (hi Micah). It'll bring some more geographical diversity to the Tor

Re: [tor-talk] Changes for dirauth gabelmoo

Hello again, On 05 Sep 2014, at 01:21, Sebastian Hahn sebast...@torproject.org wrote: it's been almost 3 years since I started maintaining gabelmoo, and I'd like to give you an update. Soon, gabelmoo will get a new hosting environment along with a much-needed hardware upgrade. Along

Re: [tor-talk] http://localhost:631/

On 09 Sep 2014, at 09:36, Hartmut Haase hha4...@web.de wrote: why can't Tor Browser connect to that page? localhost is your own computer, and you can't open a connection to your own machine using a Tor client. Cheers Sebastian -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To

[tor-talk] Changes for dirauth gabelmoo

Hey there, it's been almost 3 years since I started maintaining gabelmoo, and I'd like to give you an update. Soon, gabelmoo will get a new hosting environment along with a much-needed hardware upgrade. Along with a much better connection, I'll hope gabelmoo can serve the Tor network for quite

Re: [tor-talk] Dropping Tor Browser support for Mac OSX 10.6?

On 03 Sep 2014, at 17:08, Tor Talker tortal...@hidemeta.com wrote: [Short answer] As an individual user, I don't need Tor on Mac OS 10.6, but as a developer of a soon to be released Tor-dependent project I would like to see support continue. [Long answer] We are developing a system

Re: [tor-talk] [tor-consensus-health] Consensus issues

Hi Sebastian, thanks for looking after the network! On 16 Aug 2014, at 22:56, Sebastian G. bastik.tor wrote: On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 19:46:15 + (UTC) the doctor said: NOTICE: Consensus belonging to maatuska was missing the following authority signatures: tor26 NOTICE: Consensus belonging to

Re: [tor-talk] messing with XKeyScore

On 05 Jul 2014, at 15:08, Roman Mamedov r...@romanrm.net wrote: On Sat, 5 Jul 2014 03:59:28 + Matthew Finkel matthew.fin...@gmail.com wrote: This problem makes me sad on many levels, and I'm not opposed to implementing mitigation techniques (within reason) based on the rulesets,

Re: [tor-talk] The following directory authorities recommend other client versions than the consensus: gabelmoo

Hi, On 07 Feb 2014, at 08:05, tor-admin tor-ad...@torland.me wrote: This message was reported by the Doctor: NOTICE: The following directory authorities recommend other client versions than the consensus: gabelmoo +0.2.2.39 +0.2.4.15-rc +0.2.4.5-alpha +0.2.4.6- alpha +0.2.4.7-alpha

Re: [tor-talk] Hidden Services

On Sep 17, 2012, at 12:19 AM, Scurvy Scott wrote: I'm sure this has been asked on here before but: Is it possible to basically brute force tor hidden services by simply visiting every possible .onion address and then indexing the ones that are active? Yes all 32^16 possibilities.. Is there

Re: [tor-talk] tor-0.2.4.2-alpha compile errors

On Sep 14, 2012, at 9:34 AM, grarpamp wrote: Some easy ones... [snip] What compiler is that, and version? The code in main.c has been like this for a while, I wonder why it didn't come up before. ___ tor-talk mailing list

Re: [tor-talk] Python upgrade breaks 'random' in ARM..

On May 25, 2012, at 4:45 PM, Eric Seerden wrote: Hi Damian et al. I'm running Tor-0.2.3.15.alpha on FreeBSD 9.0, all fine.. However, I upgraded Python26 to version 2.6.8 (= up-to-date with port) it breaks ARM.. = File /usr/share/arm/starter.py line 18 in module import cli.controller

Re: [tor-talk] building tor-0.2.3.15-alpha on Ubuntu

On May 20, 2012, at 9:32 AM, BigTor wrote: People, Because I guess there's a better way to build Tor from source on my Ubuntu 12.04 box than I do, I ask for some help. I want to build Tor from source with my build-from-source openssl 1.0.1c. My OpenSSL install is in /usr/local/ssl/ ,

Re: [tor-talk] Absence of digital signature of TBB sources

On Apr 4, 2012, at 2:34 PM, and...@torproject.is wrote: On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 10:44:10AM +, rransom.8...@gmail.com wrote 0.7K bytes in 20 lines about: : The official TBBs are built from the sources in Git, not from the : tarballs. There probably shouldn't be any release tarballs for

Re: [tor-talk] About sources of TBB

On Mar 24, 2012, at 4:29 PM, James Brown wrote: On 24.03.2012 15:01, James Brown wrote: On 24.03.2012 14:57, James Brown wrote: I have got TBB-sources from here: https://www.torproject.org/projects/torbrowser-details.html.en#build But when I try to verify that, I have so strange result:

Re: [tor-talk] EVIL bug Linux Tor Browser Bundle (2.2.35-8)

On Mar 19, 2012, at 7:11 PM, clarissabryant wrote: On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:51:17 -, m...@tormail.net wrote: Wow, Anonymous! Wow, what an amazing, bug. Drama. Clearly exposing your own browsing on your own file system on your own computer is a conspiracy of epic proportions. If the

Re: [tor-talk] A paranoid question

On Mar 16, 2012, at 11:42 PM, Raynald wrote: Hi. How can I trust that the intermediate TOR computers are not really a central network for tracking and processing the communications? I see that the main sponsor is An anonymous North American NGO - New Global Order? :D - and, I don't

Re: [tor-talk] tor debian repository for non x86 arch? (arm)

On Feb 21, 2012, at 1:07 AM, Damian Johnson wrote: Hi tagnaq, from what I was aware of it's in there... https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/3391 That said, I'm not quite sure where it's located. On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 3:13 PM, tagnaq tag...@gmail.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP

Re: [tor-talk] bridge up down times

On Feb 12, 2012, at 11:38 PM, eliaz wrote: I have a few novice questions about a normal bridge I've set up. I've not found answers in the documentation. * Opposite the one country that's so far listed in the usage summary, the #Client column shows 1-8. What does this mean exactly? 1

Re: [tor-talk] Google as default search engine revisited

On Jan 10, 2012, at 5:26 PM, 5...@gmx.de wrote: I found a thread in the archive (November 2011), but I could not find a satisfying answer to the questions 1. Why is Google the default search engine in the TOR browser bundle? Because it's the default search engine in Firefox 2. Does TOR

Re: [tor-talk] Automatic vulnerability scanning of Tor Network?

On Dec 27, 2011, at 7:03 AM, John Case wrote: On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Lee wrote: While I totally get both sides of this argument *in theory*, all of this sounds a lot to me like getting pissed off about someone ringing your doorbell because they didn't mail you an opt-in form first.

Re: [tor-talk] Tor - 1-click-compile-version

On Dec 24, 2011, at 12:21 AM, Chris wrote: [snip] The threat here potentially comes from governments mandating a back door. All Tor developers that have voiced their opinion on the matter of backdoors state that they would never put in a backdoor, and personally I would immediately quit the

Re: [tor-talk] DNSl eakage

On Dec 6, 2011, at 9:16 AM, kamyar kamyar wrote: Hi, It seems that Expert Bundle is just a SocksProxy, i did configure my browser's port as 9050 and could surf the web, but what about DNS leakage issue ? after following article /tor/wiki/doc/Preventing_Tor_DNS_Leaks steps adding a line

Re: [tor-talk] Tor no longer works with win2K ??

On Nov 14, 2011, at 3:45 AM, Jim wrote: Since I don't run Microsoft software I have not paid a great deal of attention to the downloads the Tor Project offers for it. So I went and took a look at your download pages to see what Anon Mus was talking about. I see that for the bundles, you

Re: [tor-talk] Tor no longer works with win2K ??

I'll pretend you didn't insult me and the rest of the Tor dev team, and try and get your question answered. I've snipped the useless allegations. On Nov 12, 2011, at 12:52 PM, Anon Mus wrote: Jacob Appelbaum wrote: On 11/10/2011 02:39 AM, Anon Mus wrote: I got a message to upgrade my Tor

[tor-talk] New operator for gabelmoo (one of Tor's directory authorities)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi tor-talk, As of today I'm the new operator of the directory authority gabelmoo. Karsten Loesing, who has been operating it since early 2008, decided to focus more on software development and less on the sysadmin overhead that running a directory

Re: [tor-talk] Suggestion: make _hidden services_ choose random entry nodes often!

On Oct 21, 2011, at 2:27 PM, hi...@safe-mail.net wrote: All standard clients have the same entry nodes on a permanent basis or as long as the entry nodes are up, while the middle and exit nodes changes all the time. This is to reduce the chance of choosing an accidental path that is

Re: [tor-talk] since today check.torproject.org states you are not using tor

On Oct 15, 2011, at 11:27 PM, and...@torproject.org wrote: On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 04:39:25PM -0400, and...@torproject.org wrote 0.9K bytes in 21 lines about: : For some reason, the exit list doesn't see checktpo as a valid exit. If : I can't figure it out in an hour, I'll just disable the

Re: [tor-talk] Tor Browser Bundle: PGP encryption built-in?

On Oct 10, 2011, at 2:48 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote: On 10/10/2011 2:44 AM, Robert Ransom wrote: No. See https://tails.boum.org/bugs/FireGPG_may_be_unsafe/ , but beware -- I'm sure katmagic and I missed a few dozen attacks. You're correct - that is, the https site you link has an unsafe

Re: [tor-talk] Possible Attack on Tor speed?

On Aug 24, 2011, at 10:54 AM, morphium wrote: Hi, I just had an idea, how an attacker could slow down the Tor network, and wanted it to discuss with you. To my knowledge, there is only the BadExit and BadDirectory flag, nothing like BadNode. In contrast to a bad exit, which is

Re: [tor-talk] Tor 0.2.2.30-rc is out

On Jul 10, 2011, at 11:04 PM, David H. Lipman wrote: I get confused where to download. I only found Win32 unstable 0.2.2.29 :-( From: Roger Dingledine a...@mit.edu Packages will appear on the download page in the coming days. Be patient :) ___

Re: [tor-talk] ReachableAddresses *:* harmful?

On Jun 3, 2011, at 6:52 AM, Fernan Bolando wrote: Thanks, Actually openbsd seems to defaults this to ReachableAddresses *:80,*:443 Did you (or does openbsd) set the FascistFirewall option by chance? How did you learn that openbsd defaults to ReachableAddresses *:80,*:443? Thanks Sebastian

Re: [tor-talk] Tor 0.2.3.1-alpha is out!

On May 6, 2011, at 2:30 AM, Jim wrote: Nick Mathewson wrote: Changes in version 0.2.3.1-alpha - 2011-05-05 Tor 0.2.3.1-alpha adds some new experimental features, including ... automatic home router configuration. Are you saying the Tor software itself (as opposed to Vidalia or

Re: [tor-talk] seeking someone to fix a Tor rpm bug

On Mar 10, 2011, at 12:38 PM, Erinn Clark wrote: Hey Marco! * Marco Bonetti si...@slackware.it [2011:03:10 12:10 +0100]: Primarily I am worried about the upgrade scenario and changing groups in a way that doesn't break previous versions of the packages. Could you elaborate a bit on the