[tor-talk] HS drop

2013-08-11 Thread grarpamp
I'm seeing a longer tail on this event, maybe another 300+ down, it's probably a nervous and idle response. I'm adding some more tools so will have much better data to post. -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsusbscribe or change other settings go to

Re: [tor-talk] HS drop

2013-08-11 Thread Tom Ritter
Hey grarpamp, You may have explained this elsewhere, but if so I missed it (potentially while on an internet moratorium for the past week) - how are you observing these statistics? Thanks, -tom -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsusbscribe or change other settings go

Re: [tor-talk] HS drop

2013-08-11 Thread mirimir
On 08/11/2013 09:10 PM, grarpamp wrote: how are you observing these statistics? As with any other monitor on the internet, no magic, just lots of scripts :) If I see something noteable like this I'll post it here of course. Have you accumulated a list of all hidden services using spiders

Re: [tor-talk] HS drop

2013-08-11 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 2:53 PM, mirimir miri...@riseup.net wrote: Have you accumulated a list of all hidden services using spiders etc? The address space of all possible hidden services (36! = 3.72e+41) is far^N too large to scan, right? ;) Unfortunately, due to mildly design limitations in

Re: [tor-talk] HS drop

2013-08-11 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Griffin Boyce griffinbo...@gmail.com wrote: And if you spider them based on links and onion search engines, you can get a decent idea of active hidden services. But I'd still like to No need to do this.

Re: [tor-talk] HS drop

2013-08-11 Thread Griffin Boyce
On 08/11/2013 07:33 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 2:53 PM, mirimir miri...@riseup.net wrote: Have you accumulated a list of all hidden services using spiders etc? The address space of all possible hidden services (36! = 3.72e+41) is far^N too large to scan, right? ;)

Re: [tor-talk] HS drop

2013-08-11 Thread mirimir
On 08/11/2013 10:56 PM, grarpamp wrote: The address space of all possible hidden services (36! = 3.72e+41) is far^N too large to scan, right? ;) It's 2^80 and would take at least 100Myr to scan. I'm working on it but my NIC's keep wearing out. Oops. Math is not one of my strong suits, I

Re: [tor-talk] HS drop

2013-08-05 Thread grarpamp
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 12:42 AM, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote: Noting what is apparently a very large drop in the number of onions online. Still checking... Estimating dropout at about 400 onions or 1/3 of total. -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsusbscribe or

Re: [tor-talk] HS drop

2013-08-05 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 01:27:25AM -0400, grarpamp wrote: On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 12:42 AM, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote: Noting what is apparently a very large drop in the number of onions online. Still checking... Estimating dropout at about 400 onions or 1/3 of total. How are you

Re: [tor-talk] HS drop

2013-08-05 Thread grarpamp
How are you estimating 'total' here? (The way I'd do it is by running a bunch of relays with the HSDir flag, and approximating the total number of descriptor publishes based on the number that go to my relays. That would be a good method if all you wanted was a number. Yet since the dirs are

[tor-talk] HS drop

2013-08-03 Thread grarpamp
Noting what is apparently a very large drop in the number of onions online. Still checking... -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsusbscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Re: [tor-talk] HS drop

2013-08-03 Thread Trigger Happy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 W dniu 04.08.2013 06:42, grarpamp pisze: Noting what is apparently a very large drop in the number of onions online. Still checking... http://www.reddit.com/r/onions/comments/1jmrta/founder_of_the_freedom_hosting_arrested_held/ - -- Pzdr