Re: [tor-talk] ICANN and .onion

2014-06-22 Thread BM-2cU3w6ptnEhgt249n69qkXUeAsHDYvcqS9
Users leaking dns / failing to redirect dns into tor is not a tor problem. https://www.verisigninc.com/assets/labs/Measuring-the-Leakage-of-Onion-at-the-Root.pdf -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to

Re: [tor-talk] ICANN and .onion

2014-05-30 Thread grarpamp
Users leaking dns / failing to redirect dns into tor is not a tor problem. I'm going to rebut these two replies a bit. TPO makes Tor, the client, and some surrounding tools, and docs, and efforts regarding Tor in the world. It's not Tor's responsibility to somehow reach into users machines,

Re: [tor-talk] ICANN and .onion

2014-05-19 Thread grarpamp
1) Has there been any discussions regarding the severity of the problem Seems not much tech issue here, the tor client treats .onion as special and funnels the whole thing to the dht. tor will get a new config bitmap that says 'set priority to resolve .onoin in dht or external first, or remain

Re: [tor-talk] ICANN and .onion

2014-05-19 Thread Anders Andersson
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 7:06 AM, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote: Users leaking dns / failing to redirect dns into tor is not a tor problem. I think that's a rather arrogant point of view. If it was not a Tor problem, .onion would not be needed in the first place. Tor developers do seem to

Re: [tor-talk] ICANN and .onion

2014-05-19 Thread Andrew Lewman
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:24:06AM +0200, pipat...@gmail.com wrote 1.5K bytes in 0 lines about: : I think that's a rather arrogant point of view. If it was not a Tor : problem, .onion would not be needed in the first place. Tor developers do : seem to work hard on making it difficult for a user

Re: [tor-talk] ICANN and .onion

2014-05-19 Thread hellekin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 05/19/2014 06:24 AM, Anders Andersson wrote: On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 7:06 AM, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote: Users leaking dns / failing to redirect dns into tor is not a tor problem. *** That is a common technologist / U.S. liberal /

[tor-talk] ICANN and .onion

2014-05-18 Thread Anders Andersson
A few years ago, ICANN started to accept suggestions for new top-level domain names. A friend recently posted a .onion link to me, and it made me realize that there might be a big problem if a company or organization other than Tor actually registered .onion and made it work in any browser. 1)

Re: [tor-talk] ICANN and .onion

2014-05-18 Thread flapflap
Anders Andersson: A few years ago, ICANN started to accept suggestions for new top-level domain names. A friend recently posted a .onion link to me, and it made me realize that there might be a big problem if a company or organization other than Tor actually registered .onion and made it work

Re: [tor-talk] ICANN and .onion

2014-05-18 Thread Andrew Lewman
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 07:39:24PM +0200, pipat...@gmail.com wrote 0.9K bytes in 0 lines about: : 2) Has Tor applied to ICANN about the .onion domain, or discussed the pro : and con of doing this? We didn't apply, but when inquiring about it, they wanted us to provide trademark proof (which we