On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:09:43PM -0700, Mike Perry wrote:
Thus spake Joe Btfsplk (joebtfs...@gmx.com):
On 3/21/2011 2:39 PM, Paul Syverson wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 02:06:04PM -0500, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
Last comments for a while. (All I have time for, sorry.) I'm just
going to
On 3/21/2011 6:38 PM, Al MailingList wrote:
That's a very good point klaus.
Joe - if you think the US Government is one big cohesive entity that
funds projects consistently from a single pool of resources and money
then I would politely suggest you may not have had much to do with
them :P
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Joe Btfsplk joebtfs...@gmx.com wrote:
Why would any govt create something their enemies can easily use against
them, then continue funding it once they know it helps the enemy, if a govt
has absolutely no control over it? It's that simple. It would seem a
On 3/22/2011 3:57 PM, Michael Reed wrote:
BINGO, we have a winner! The original *QUESTION* posed that led to
the invention of Onion Routing was, Can we build a system that allows
for bi-directional communications over the Internet where the source
and destination cannot be determined by a
1st, thanks for the refresher, Paul. I'll bet most users didn't know
Tor was started by the NRL. Unfortunately, for many, that won't ease
their minds much.
I don't have the knowledge skills to check Tor's source code bet
well 90% of users don't either.
I know (knew) my comments on Tor
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:40 AM, katmagic the.magical@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:07:49 -0400
Paul Syverson syver...@itd.nrl.navy.mil wrote:
universities are in on it, and the supposedly independent researchers
who found code flaws were also in on it (or sock puppets created
Joe Btfsplk joebtfs...@gmx.com wrote on 21.03.2011:
Again, WHY would Sam develop or fund technology that would make it
possible for * their enemies * to communicate anonymously and
privately, possibly allowing them to plot against him, with ABSOLUTELY
no way to decipher that communication?
On 3/21/2011 2:39 PM, Paul Syverson wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 02:06:04PM -0500, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
Last comments for a while. (All I have time for, sorry.) I'm just
going to respond to specific issues about system threats and the
like.
I appreciate your comments the work of all involved
On 2011-03-21 16:17, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
[...]
I don't pretend to know the answers, but know when to ask questions.
For all I know, the US wants the enemy to use Tor for plotting, thinking
they're anonymous, when they're not. No one's answering my specific
questions, possibly because if they
That's a very good point klaus.
Joe - if you think the US Government is one big cohesive entity that funds
projects consistently from a single pool of resources and money then I would
politely suggest you may not have had much to do with them :P
Alfred
On 21 Mar 2011 16:27, Klaus Layer
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 3:16 AM, Mike Perry mikepe...@fscked.org wrote:
For example: Trust the community. So many different people have
worked on, volunteered for, attacked, reviewed, and researched
tor-related topics from so many different institutions and backgrounds
that it is *the* most
Thus spake Joe Btfsplk (joebtfs...@gmx.com):
On 3/21/2011 2:39 PM, Paul Syverson wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 02:06:04PM -0500, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
Last comments for a while. (All I have time for, sorry.) I'm just
going to respond to specific issues about system threats and the
like.
I
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:04:45PM -0500, Edward Langenback wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Joe Btfsplk wrote:
On 3/20/2011 5:08 PM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
13 matches
Mail list logo
