> 2. Go to ipv4.google.com
> 3. search, captcha that will show up should be just text, and easier.
> This would've been easier if there was a NoScript blacklist where JS
> is always disabled, instead of constantly switching between security
Yes javascript.enable=false seems nicer (with "text
> Looks like all connections from Tor exits by innocent Tor users
to Google"s search service are being treated by Google as
being lepers and are constantly force fed captchas so Google
can eat them as fois gras.
Work-around that I found to be somewhat acceptable:
1. Set high security setting,
2.
James Bunnell:
> grarpamp:
>
>> Fuck Google.
>>
>
> yes, agreed.
>
Smart. Open source smart. Beats giving a comparable service.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
grarpamp:
> Fuck Google.
>
yes, agreed.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 1:39 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
>
> It looks like a growing number of connections from Tor exits are being
> treated by Google as being Ukrainian.
Looks like all connections from Tor exits by innocent Tor users
to Google's search service are being treated
On 20 Jun 2017 1:24 pm, "Paul Syverson" wrote:
On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 10:22:19AM -0400, krishna e bera wrote:
> On 18/06/17 05:50 AM, Alec Muffett wrote:
> >In other news, the FB Onion, for some time after it launched, geolocated
to
> >London. I can't imagine why.
>
On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 10:22:19AM -0400, krishna e bera wrote:
> On 18/06/17 05:50 AM, Alec Muffett wrote:
> >In other news, the FB Onion, for some time after it launched, geolocated to
> >London. I can't imagine why.
>
> How can a .onion geolocate anywhere? Arent they supposed to be entirely
krishna e bera:
> On 18/06/17 05:50 AM, Alec Muffett wrote:
>> In other news, the FB Onion, for some time after it launched,
>> geolocated to London. I can't imagine why.
>
> How can a .onion geolocate anywhere? Arent they supposed to be
> entirely in cyberspace and hidden?
How can a TWO digit
On 18/06/17 05:50 AM, Alec Muffett wrote:
In other news, the FB Onion, for some time after it launched, geolocated to
London. I can't imagine why.
How can a .onion geolocate anywhere? Arent they supposed to be entirely
in cyberspace and hidden?
--
tor-talk mailing list -
On Sun, 18 Jun 2017 10:50:27 +, Alec Muffett wrote:
> On 18 June 2017 at 06:39, Roger Dingledine wrote:
...
> Or, indeed, there are people whose self-declared Google-account country of
> residence is Ukraine, and enough of them have been logging into Google from
> the exit node
On 18 June 2017 at 06:39, Roger Dingledine wrote:
For those who haven't been paying attention, we got a jump in some
> hundreds of thousands of .ua users recently:
>
...
> I wonder if a lot of ordinary people doing ordinary things via Tor,
> and acting like people in the Ukraine,
Motivated by a blog post comment:
https://blog.torproject.org/comment/269237#comment-269237
It looks like a growing number of connections from Tor exits are being
treated by Google as being Ukrainian.
Anecdotally, I've experienced it too -- Google news keeps wanting to
give me Ukrainian news.
12 matches
Mail list logo