Re: [tor-talk] Small server, not much bandwidth

2014-04-10 Thread Roman Mamedov
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 18:24:00 +0100 John Williams wrote: > 3. If I run obfsproxy, should I open the regular tor port 9001 to the > internet also? Or will that get me onto blacklists of "known tor > bridges" and cause my whole IP address to be blocked? The "regular tor port" doesn't *have* to be 9

Re: [tor-talk] Small server, not much bandwidth

2014-04-10 Thread Soul Plane
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 06:24:00PM +0100, John Williams wrote: > > 3. If I run obfsproxy, should I open the regular tor port 9001 to the > > internet also? Or will that get me onto blacklists of "known tor > > bridges" and cause my whole

Re: [tor-talk] Small server, not much bandwidth

2014-04-10 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 06:24:00PM +0100, John Williams wrote: > 1. Is such a small bandwidth going to make a worthwhile contribution? Yes probably. Can't hurt, might help! :) > 2. What port number should I run obfsproxy on, to minimize the chance > of it being blocked from potential users? I'm r

[tor-talk] Small server, not much bandwidth

2014-04-10 Thread John Williams
I've got a small server with a few hundred kilobytes/sec spare; I'm considering running a bridge node on it (including obfsproxy). I've got 3 questions: 1. Is such a small bandwidth going to make a worthwhile contribution? 2. What port number should I run obfsproxy on, to minimize the chance of i