Re: [tor-talk] Third-party QAs

2013-06-17 Thread Sebastian G. bastik.tor
17.06.2013 05:28, Andrew Lewman: On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 15:03:13 +0200 Sebastian G. bastik.tor bastik@googlemail.com wrote: I'd like to raise concerns about third-party QAs and discuss them. We've had this discussion for the past year or so, see

[tor-talk] Third-party QAs

2013-06-16 Thread Sebastian G. bastik.tor
Hi, I'd like to raise concerns about third-party QAs and discuss them. This is independent from stackexchange. (I don't mind using stackexchange) Points regarding third-party operated and/or hosted QAs Advantages: - No server costs - No bandwidth costs - No installing or updating software -

Re: [tor-talk] Third-party QAs

2013-06-16 Thread adrelanos
Hi! I'd like to raise concerns about third-party QAs and discuss them. I was also wondering [1] about that already. After all the years of arguing over a forum, you now finally end up using some free service with no control about its servers? Didn't the trac ticket say, you have sponsoring for

Re: [tor-talk] Third-party QAs

2013-06-16 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 11:09 AM, adrelanos adrela...@riseup.net wrote: Hi! [...] Well, I guess having any non-ideal Q/A forum is better than forever having no Q/A forum. Hi, Adrelanos! You have hit the nail on the head with that part. So because I'm not principally involved with the

Re: [tor-talk] Third-party QAs

2013-06-16 Thread Andrew Lewman
On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 15:03:13 +0200 Sebastian G. bastik.tor bastik@googlemail.com wrote: I'd like to raise concerns about third-party QAs and discuss them. We've had this discussion for the past year or so, see https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/5995 and