On 2011-10-10, Arturo Filastò wrote:
> On 10/10/11 9:44 AM, Robert Ransom wrote:
>> On 2011-10-10, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) wrote:
>>> is anyone evaluating whenever to include PGP encryption support into the
>>> default Tor Browser Bundle as a Firefox extension?
>> No.
>>
> I actually think it wo
Thus spake Arturo Filastò (a...@globaleaks.org):
> I actually think it would be a great idea to include PGP encryption
> support into the browser.
> I remember discussing this with Jake some time ago of maybe in the
> future having a bundle for Thunderbird and enigmail. I don't see why it
> it a b
On 10/10/2011 01:07 PM, Mike Perry wrote:
The problem with a browser extension is that the very thing that makes
it useful is what makes it so risky. A GPG plugin of any kind becomes
a vector for all sorts of nasty web attacks that would have normally
been stopped by the server, such as XSS, XSRF
On 10/10/11 9:44 AM, Robert Ransom wrote:
> On 2011-10-10, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) wrote:
>> is anyone evaluating whenever to include PGP encryption support into the
>> default Tor Browser Bundle as a Firefox extension?
> No.
>
I actually think it would be a great idea to include PGP encryption
s
On 10/10/11 13:48, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
>> tails.boum.org uses an invalid security certificate.
> Anyone else seeing same security msg?
Well done, you've found the flaw in the PKI model.
Julian
--
3072D/D2DE707D Julian Yon (2011 General Use)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signatu
On Oct 10, 2011, at 2:48 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> On 10/10/2011 2:44 AM, Robert Ransom wrote:
>> No. See https://tails.boum.org/bugs/FireGPG_may_be_unsafe/ , but beware --
>> I'm sure katmagic and I missed a few dozen attacks.
> You're correct - that is, the https site you link has an unsafe cer
On 10/10/2011 2:44 AM, Robert Ransom wrote:
No. See https://tails.boum.org/bugs/FireGPG_may_be_unsafe/ , but
beware -- I'm sure katmagic and I missed a few dozen attacks.
You're correct - that is, the https site you link has an unsafe
certificate, * per msg * in Firefox 7:
tails.boum.org uses a
On 2011-10-10, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) wrote:
> is anyone evaluating whenever to include PGP encryption support into the
> default Tor Browser Bundle as a Firefox extension?
No.
> I looked at the implementation and:
>
> * FireGPG it's discontinued http://getfiregpg.org/s/install
> It also see
Hi all,
is anyone evaluating whenever to include PGP encryption support into the
default Tor Browser Bundle as a Firefox extension?
I looked at the implementation and:
* FireGPG it's discontinued http://getfiregpg.org/s/install
It also seems it was using a "bad design" practice for the IPC
com
