On 08/24/2012 06:03 PM, Randolph D. wrote:
the browser update 1.35 has been released to the
testers and they have sent no failures back,
Because Dooble v. 1.35 did not run on my Linux64 test system.
(I have had no problems to get v. 1.31 running.)
so dooble is working proper and quite well
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012, at 20:11, A. Megas wrote:
My turn.
Cool! We're having a contest!
You're insinuating that some dark conspiracy is at work with Dooble.
Dooble
This is a Straw Man Fallacy. Check it out on the web, although you might
be using it on purpose. I was not insinuating. I was
Hi,
Uploaded. Please remove $HOME/.dooble before using 1.35. Please also verify
that Settings-Security-Display... is disabled.
I tested 1.35 with respect to DNS queries alongside Wireshark (I removed
DNS filters). The results were positive for both HTTP and FTP, that is,
Wireshark didn't detect
With Weather Eye Open:
Original Message
From: Nick Mathewson ni...@alum.mit.edu
We release a piece of software called TorBrowser. I don't know
how much more simple I can make that, Randolph. We *already* use
that name for one of the components of the TBB.
While I
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012, at 01:50, Matthew Finkel wrote:
I mostly ignored this thread because I didn't think it was a big deal.
I figured the name of your new web browser would most likely confuse
people, but that could easily be changed once enough people convinced
you of that. But then I
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012, at 03:21, A. Megas wrote:
As for leaking IP information, we work with a framework (Qt) that has
issues and limitations. Every release of Dooble includes detailed
information covering all of the fixes and improvements.
Thanks.
So the package is unfit. As most people who
Hi antispam
you are an activist for 120 % right?, the mailinglist is not only populated
with developers, but as well with people like you propagating the
apocalypse. We should be on the same direction. I guess you are not a
developer?
Andrew Lewman asked in the developer team what to do and sent a
My turn.
You're insinuating that some dark conspiracy is at work with Dooble. Dooble
isn't a scam. It's a Web browser with real users, real feedback, and real
goals. It's one thing when you harass other projects that intend to use or
misuse it (or misrepresent it) and another when you're
well for the cool down some facts:
there WAS in version dooble 1.31. QFP used, which leaked the Proxy for DNS
this problem has been solved:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50622
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=1108293aid=3523760group_id=238964
someone on this list tested
TBB =/ Torbrowser
website redesgined in blue
disclaimer added twice.
the domain exists since 2 years and no webkit browser ever has bundle.
let´s see what progress can be made.
2012/8/16 Nick Mathewson ni...@alum.mit.edu
I wish rename software, redesign website, and
actually warn his users
Hi,
please post a download link for version 1.35 (Linux64)
I will test it again.
On 08/16/2012 08:23 PM, Randolph D. wrote:
there WAS in version dooble 1.31. QFP used, which leaked the Proxy for DNS
this problem has been solved:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50622
The bug is not
Do you need help with a brand new design?
I am willing to buy you a custom template so you can have a great
looking site and not look like Tor's official site. :)
Just send me the link to one that you like: http://themeforest.net/
All the best,
SiNA
Randolph D.:
Hello
there is preparation
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Randolph D. rdohm...@gmail.com wrote:
TBB =/ Torbrowser
website redesgined in blue
Though imitation is the highest form of flattery, you should really
just redesign your site. Create your own CSS and maybe try using a
3-column design instead of just 2...provides
there is preparation draft work done to get the vidalia Qt plugin out for
the TorBrowser based on Dooble Web Browser 1.35 with lots of security
improvments.
Is there something to change on the drafted website?
Yes, you should inform your users that Dooble (and thus your TorBrowser
clone) has
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 22:09:03 +0200
Randolph D. rdohm...@gmail.com wrote:
the domain exists for years, it has been acquired for the Qt update,
see the given 2010 release with still firefox.
From what I can tell, it didn't look like this since 2010.
As there it TBB, Tor Browser Bundle, the
Hi,
I tested the latest Dooble release with SOCKS5 proxy (with Tor) and HTTP
proxy (with JonDo) and the preconfigured I2P proxy for eepsites.
It leaks DNS queries and FTP requests in all cases. Yes - it leaks DNS
queries with the preconfigured I2P proxy too. At first the system DNS
resolver
As you already can see on the website, it is added (maybe done later than
you looked first):
TorBrowser Source code is open source and not affiliated with Tor, but
simply use Tor. Tor and the Onion Logo are registered trademarks of the
Tor Project, Inc. Content on this site is licensed under a
Hi Karsten
thanks for the test, I remember that there is as well a bug url already in
webkit to address this issue.
that´s why development is needed, maybe as well from the tor project to
provide a patch! Each third user is affected.
Render Engine Total Avg
Trident 50.19%
Web Kit 29.49%
Gecko
What do you consider the latest release?
-- Forwarded message --
From: Karsten N. k...@awxcnx.de
Date: 2012/8/15
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Hi,
I tested the latest Dooble release with SOCKS5 proxy
Do you mind testing a beta release of 1.35 with respect to this issue?
Thanks.
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Karsten N. k...@awxcnx.de wrote:
On 08/16/2012 01:06 AM, A. Megas wrote:
I recorded some raw and extremely verbose tcpdump data while visiting
ftp.debian.org using version 1.35
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:26 PM, dumbnewbie dumbnew...@gmail.com wrote:
I did a brief check but didn't determine the answer - is perrymikey
(http://sourceforge.net/users/perrymikey) the same as mikeperry
(https://blog.torproject.org/blogs/mikeperry)?
Absolutely not.
And unless there really
Mathew, you did not look close and are just stepping into a train,
This project has not yet published any files. The given files are there
since 2010 and use firefox. Didn ´t you realise that?
since 2 years there has been no idea about this and we just changed the
website to an open source
Hello
there is preparation draft work done to get the vidalia Qt plugin out for
the TorBrowser based on Dooble Web Browser 1.35 with lots of security
improvments.
Is there something to change on the drafted website?
http://torbrowser.sourceforge.net/
Can the Tor Onion be shown in the First
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:38:13 +0200
Randolph D. rdohm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
there is preparation draft work done to get the vidalia Qt plugin out
for the TorBrowser based on Dooble Web Browser 1.35 with lots of
security improvments.
Is there something to change on the drafted website?
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012, at 22:09, Randolph D. wrote:
the domain exists for years, it has been acquired for the Qt update, see
the given 2010 release with still firefox.
As there it TBB, Tor Browser Bundle, the TorBrowser should not affect
this.
Than why do you advertise it here if pushing
25 matches
Mail list logo
