On 10/2/2013 12:08 AM, Andreas Krey wrote:
On Tue, 01 Oct 2013 13:43:10 +, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
...
I believe in same TBB version (maybe the same in many versions) they
spoof the useragent & time zone, but wouldn't differences in screen
sizes & color bit ALONE, among a few users on one entry
On Tue, 01 Oct 2013 13:43:10 +, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
...
> I believe in same TBB version (maybe the same in many versions) they
> spoof the useragent & time zone, but wouldn't differences in screen
> sizes & color bit ALONE, among a few users on one entry / exit
> combination, at a given momen
On 10/1/2013 12:06 PM, Nicolas Vigier wrote:
On Tue, 01 Oct 2013, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
Not sure I understand the question in this context. Without
cookies, I don't expect them to identify repeat visitors. I read
their full paper on how they use the data collected
https://panopticlick.eff.org/br
On Tue, 01 Oct 2013, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> On 10/1/2013 12:48 AM, Andreas Krey wrote:
> >On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 21:08:58 +, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> >...
> >>No cookies are set, so that doesn't affect outcome. In fact, the "bits
> >>of identifying information" shown in results chart largely remain
>
On 10/1/2013 12:48 AM, Andreas Krey wrote:
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 21:08:58 +, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
...
No cookies are set, so that doesn't affect outcome. In fact, the "bits
of identifying information" shown in results chart largely remain
identical (except screen size sometimes changes), but th
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 21:08:58 +, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
...
> No cookies are set, so that doesn't affect outcome. In fact, the "bits
> of identifying information" shown in results chart largely remain
> identical (except screen size sometimes changes), but their estimate of
> "One in X browsers
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:14:25 +, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
...
> I don't know where / how it gets the screen size, but mine definitely
> isn't 947 wide. It's actually a very common size.
Tor browser seems to use the windows size as the display size.
> I assume the color depth is bit value. Panopti
On 9/30/2013 6:14 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
Info given on panopticlick.eff.org is a bit confusing in that some of
it seems incorrect. If that makes a browser "more common," I guess
it's a good thing.
But some of the info it shows as incorrect is very "uncommon." That
doesn't mean someone trying t
Info given on panopticlick.eff.org is a bit confusing in that some of it
seems incorrect. If that makes a browser "more common," I guess it's a
good thing.
But some of the info it shows as incorrect is very "uncommon." That
doesn't mean someone trying to finger print a browser would get the sa
