Re: [tor-talk] Anonymity and Voip

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 8:43 AM, panoramix.druida wrote: >> https://www.onioncat.org/ >> https://github.com/david415/onionvpn > So my understunding is that I could use any IP protocol and communicate with > each other as if we where in a LAN. Is that right? Yes,

Re: [tor-talk] Anonymity and Voip

On 05/10/2018 01:35 PM, panoramix.druida wrote: > > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > El 10 de mayo de 2018 7:41 PM, Mirimir escribió: > [] >> However, keep in mind that VoIP is fundamentally inconsistent with >> >> anonymity. Because voice analysis is so

Re: [tor-talk] Anonymity and Voip

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ El 10 de mayo de 2018 7:41 PM, Mirimir escribió: [] > However, keep in mind that VoIP is fundamentally inconsistent with > > anonymity. Because voice analysis is so effective. And because it's very > > hard to obfuscate voice enough

Re: [tor-talk] Who controls Tor's DNS Traffic?

Jacki M: > Can you open a ticket on Trac.torproject.org > with a explanation of the problem and > proposed solutions? This will make it much easier for the Tor Devs to > address the Problem. This is primarily a exit configuration problem, but tor can help by warning

Re: [tor-talk] Who controls Tor's DNS Traffic?

On Thu, 10 May 2018 21:53:00 + nusenu wrote: > I had a look at the Tor DNS landscape: > > An Analysis of the Tor DNS Landscape > https://medium.com/@nusenu/who-controls-tors-dns-traffic-a74a7632e8ca "Level 3" on the charts is most likely the notorious

Re: [tor-talk] Who controls Tor's DNS Traffic?

Can you open a ticket on Trac.torproject.org with a explanation of the problem and proposed solutions? This will make it much easier for the Tor Devs to address the Problem. > On May 10, 2018, at 2:53 PM, nusenu wrote: > > I had a look

[tor-talk] Who controls Tor's DNS Traffic?

I had a look at the Tor DNS landscape: An Analysis of the Tor DNS Landscape https://medium.com/@nusenu/who-controls-tors-dns-traffic-a74a7632e8ca -- https://mastodon.social/@nusenu twitter: @nusenu_ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- tor-talk mailing list -

Re: [tor-talk] Anonymity and Voip

On 05/10/2018 01:43 AM, panoramix.druida wrote: > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > El 9 de mayo de 2018 5:22 PM, grarpamp escribió: > >> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Nathan Freitas nat...@freitas.net wrote: >> >>> In general, the issue with VoIP over Tor, is that

Re: [tor-talk] What is e10s?

Hi Nathaniel, e10s refers to Mozilla Electrolysis project[0] AFAIK [0] https://wiki.mozilla.org/Electrolysis -- Jas On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 8:21 PM, Nathaniel Suchy (Lunorian) wrote: > I keep seeing the term e10s used on the mailing list and bug tracker > from time to time

[tor-talk] What is e10s?

I keep seeing the term e10s used on the mailing list and bug tracker from time to time but it's unclear what that is? So what is e10s, how do I know if I have it, and how does it benefit / dis-benefit me? Cheers, Nathaniel signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- tor-talk

Re: [tor-talk] Anonymity and Voip

P2P VOIP solutions do exist. I personally prefer to use a trusted Mumble server over Tor. panoramix.druida: > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > El 9 de mayo de 2018 5:22 PM, grarpamp escribió: > >> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Nathan Freitas nat...@freitas.net

Re: [tor-talk] Anonymity and Voip

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ El 9 de mayo de 2018 5:22 PM, grarpamp escribió: > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Nathan Freitas nat...@freitas.net wrote: > > > In general, the issue with VoIP over Tor, is that Tor only supports TCP, > > > > and not UDP, which most

[tor-talk] Bug in the initial release of Tor Browser 7.5.4

Hi everyone, Yesterday, I noticed, and pointed out on Twitter (See: https://twitter.com/nathanielrsuchy/status/994284995765243904) that after updating the browser page still said Tor Browser was out of date. Shortly there after the Tor Project released a new build fixing the issue. If you updated

Re: [tor-talk] starting tor using systemd, readiness issue

On 10-05-18 11:34, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: > May 10 11:20:56.000 [notice] Bootstrapped 0%: Starting > May 10 11:21:25.000 [notice] Starting with guard context "default" > May 10 11:21:25.000 [notice] Bootstrapped 80%: Connecting to the Tor network > May 10 11:21:25.000 [notice] Signaled

[tor-talk] starting tor using systemd, readiness issue

Hello, As I moved the firewall box to a UPS, upon startup I noticed an issue with tor: it was being started over and over again by systemd. The log has stuff like: May 10 11:20:53.000 [notice] Tor 0.3.2.10 (git-31cc63deb69db819) opening log file. May 10 11:20:53.869 [warn] OpenSSL version from