Re: [tor-talk] US Federal Court: The Fourth Amendment Does Not Protect Your Home Computer

On 6/24/2016 8:39 AM, Allen wrote: On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 2:19 AM, grarpamp wrote: https://www.eff.org/files/2016/06/23/matish_suppression_edva.pdf

Re: [tor-talk] US Federal Court: The Fourth Amendment Does Not Protect Your Home Computer

On 6/24/2016 4:26 PM, I wrote: " foreign law" QED Yes - most lands & their laws, other than the one a person grew up in or resides in are "foreign" to them. It's not a slur. :D -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to

Re: [tor-talk] US Federal Court: The Fourth Amendment Does Not Protect Your Home Computer

" foreign law " QED -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Re: [tor-talk] US Federal Court: The Fourth Amendment Does Not Protect Your Home Computer

>> > You can post news about your country. Certainly, but should I presume sees the world from that perspective? -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Re: [tor-talk] US Federal Court: The Fourth Amendment Does Not Protect Your Home Computer

On 24.06.16 16:08, I wrote: Is this list for all Tor people or just USA? Subject: Re: [tor-talk] US Federal Court: The Fourth Amendment Does Not Protect Your Home Computer You can post news about your country. -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change

Re: [tor-talk] US Federal Court: The Fourth Amendment Does Not Protect Your Home Computer

On 6/24/2016 8:08 AM, I wrote: Is this list for all Tor people or just USA? Subject: Re: [tor-talk] US Federal Court: The Fourth Amendment Does Not Protect Your Home Computer Is that a serious or satirical question? It's always been for people of all countries, as far as I remember

Re: [tor-talk] US Federal Court: The Fourth Amendment Does Not Protect Your Home Computer

Seems that saying "the decision is bad news for privacy" is an historical understatement. It's more like burning the Constitution & shooting the ashes out of the solar system. "We don't need no stinking warrant." I have doubts that sending scolding emails or petitions will in any way change

Re: [tor-talk] US Federal Court: The Fourth Amendment Does Not Protect Your Home Computer

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 2:19 AM, grarpamp wrote: > https://www.eff.org/files/2016/06/23/matish_suppression_edva.pdf > > The judge's logic is pretty

Re: [tor-talk] US Federal Court: The Fourth Amendment Does Not Protect Your Home Computer

Is this list for all Tor people or just USA? > Subject: Re: [tor-talk] US Federal Court: The Fourth Amendment Does Not > Protect Your Home Computer -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/c

Re: [tor-talk] US Federal Court: The Fourth Amendment Does Not Protect Your Home Computer

On 24.06.16 09:19, grarpamp wrote: The EFF reports that a federal court in Virginia today ruled that a criminal defendant has no "reasonable expectation of privacy" in his personal computer (PDF), located inside his home. The court says the federal government does not need a warrant to hack into

[tor-talk] US Federal Court: The Fourth Amendment Does Not Protect Your Home Computer

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/06/federal-court-fourth-amendment-does-not-protect-your-home-computer https://www.eff.org/files/2016/06/23/matish_suppression_edva.pdf https://yro.slashdot.org/story/16/06/23/2040255/federal-court-the-fourth-amendment-does-not-protect-your-home-computer The EFF