Re: [tor-talk] catastrophe: ip-api.com sees me

On 1/29/18, Duncan wrote: > Hi, > You need to actually raise an issue (maybe a ticket) to help improve the > documentation. Ok, got it, I will -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to

[tor-talk] catastrophe: ip-api.com sees me

ip-api.com sees me, it means not only one Why he sees my ip in the Chrome and Opera, but under TBB does not What is the matter?!! -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Re: [tor-talk] catastrophe: ip-api.com sees me

On 1/29/18, Ben Tasker wrote: > Silly question, have you actually configured your other browsers to use > Tor? It's ok, I'm not so stupid these faq are too verbose -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to

Re: [tor-talk] catastrophe: ip-api.com sees me

On 1/29/18, Roger Dingledine <a...@mit.edu> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 12:38:32PM +0200, Anon Hyde wrote: >> ip-api.com sees me, it means not only one > Using any browser with Tor besides Tor Browser is usually a bad idea: > https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq#TBBOt

Re: [tor-talk] Finding "Good" neigbors

On 2/1/18, Lara wrote: > what specialized outlets will deliver. As for "legitimate", Silk Road > And government officials killing people in the hundreds for having the > wrong skin color is both "upholding the law" and "protecting the > innocent". Yes, it is, Ms

Re: [tor-talk] Finding "Good" neigbors

On 2/11/18, Iain Learmonth wrote: > Bad relays are removed by the directory authorities from the consensus. It is good decision, but not working well. I'd lot of problem in the past until I filled my personal blacklist. It would be nice to load the torrc over the URL, so as

Re: [tor-talk] ip-api.com sees me

On 2/17/18, Wanderingnet wrote: > not be snooped. I seem to be unable now to locate the page, but this would > solve many of the problems of bad nodes in the Tor network, at least if a > filtered network composed solely of such systems were used. Of course, you >

[tor-talk] Tor4

On 2/17/18, Scfith Riseup wrote: > You are already using protonmail, so you are already a shill. Electronic > devices leave signatures and vulnerable to collection & traffic analysis. I actually, we have best of the best tool for secure talking and meeting. strictly from peer

[tor-talk] Tor 4

> > > https://ricochet.im/ > https://onionshare.org/ > > > So, what's different? it's even worse, the torchat at least my tor launches, but the ricochet has a built-in, and an ancient one. automatic upgrade is not present. not present cli-version - with such it is necessary to begin and build

Re: [tor-talk] Tor4

I've poor slow english and apologize for any possible inaccuracies. Who is "shill"? I mean the Tor has better design for secure data exchange at this moment, and any "Talk" can be build on the onion at several days, even hours. It is a surprise me almost complete absence of special (using onion