verypsb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17295
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96419
___
Touch mailing list
gerardhn wrote:
...Not to be arrogant.
Too late.
And, to borrow a comment I made elsewhere on the forum, it has always
struck me as rather ironic that the subjective evaluation adherents
don't think are they affected by subjective bias.
This is so strange,
I report to my honesty that I hear an obvious difference between Jplay
and Touch.
I only want to mention that. Not more not less.
I say you need an high end system to hear the differences.
I�m just curious how this is possible.
Now my wondering is the following: why
Thanks for developing a great application :) I have been using
SBT(EDO)Audiohilleo 1 Metrum Octave DAC with satisfying results for
files up to 24/96. Recently tried to play a 24/192 file, but it sounds
like slow motion...if this makes sense? Is this because my Metrum is
limited to 176 or could
If you have set the Touch up to pass bit perfect digital data to you
DAC, yet you are hearing differences with different transports, then I'd
consider changing your DAC to one that better rejects the analog noises
and distortions that accompany the digital data and which are causing
you to hear
Triode wrote:
I'm afraid upgrading the alsa library will be a problem - if there are
specific patches for the kernel driver then these can be added but I
would need to know which ones.
Triode, how can I locate the required patches? I'm used to performing
basic operations in the terminal, but
gerardhn wrote:
This is so strange,
I report to my honesty that I hear an obvious difference between Jplay
and Touch.
I only want to mention that. Not more not less.
I say you need an high end system to hear the differences.
I�m just curious how this is possible.
Now my
Gary's,
You are really talkingnonsense!
So i can get 6000 plus Posts.
Where did i posta statement about bit perfect? I posted a observation
about a difference and asked a question about bit perfect.
I don't see any fact or science from you or your equal posters. Only
nonsense.
Happy to
gerardhn wrote:
I say you need an high end system to hear the differences.
Here is a response from someone with the exact same touch - cp-800 -
ca-2300 - bw 802di (+ a too high amount on cabling).
First of all, gerardhn, I have the opinion that your posts are a bit
aggressive. This is a
gerardhn wrote:
Gary's,
Where did i posta statement about bit perfect?
Hmmm, my mistake. Someone else with your exact name is saying this
earlier in the thread:
gerardhn wrote:
Logitech touch is not bitperfect. Today I took day off to compare the
following:
[remainder of post
Aubuti,
Thank for your writing in line with the discussion .
Again repeated for the 100 time I never make a diagnosis
Read the the subject as defined by me.
I make an observation. I make suggestion, a hypothesis , a suggestion ,
that touch bits are not perfect. Please follow discussion
gerardhn wrote:
I make an observation. I make suggestion, a hypothesis , a suggestion ,
that touch bits are not perfect. Please follow discussion line.
Please search this forum or use google, etc. There is plenty of
documentation already there. There is no need to suggest a hypothesis
about
All, hopefully we've now moved beyond trying to convince the OP that the
bit values are not being changed by the Touch at full volume and without
replay gain etc.
What I wanted to raise is whether asynch USB fully eliminates the
influence of the source computer. It would seem that one needs
Garym,
What is said on this on this forum does not be true for me. It became
clear to me that most people with thousands of threads ...
Leave it.
Questioning you I didnot see, read, cannot see, cannot read any
evidence why touch is perfect. Except I can see people with thousands of
threads
gerardhn wrote:
I think it is a CPU, interrupt, memory management problem.
I think you may be right. Looking at the source code of the Touch,
interrupts may occur in the middle of a bit. Then, in the interrupt
handler, free() is being called and releases only half of the bit.
Albeit being very
Sbellon,
Yes of course, the solution (or problem) is in this area.
Can share to you that today I played with a setting in this field:
buffer tuning (experimental). Must admit that setting very large (USB
only) ... Sounds better. Did not try the last option: very large and
randomise CPU. (USB
sbellon wrote:
I think you may be right. Looking at the source code of the Touch,
interrupts may occur in the middle of a bit. Then, in the interrupt
handler, free() is being called and releases only half of the bit.
Albeit being very rare, in sum several bits can get lost. As JPlay does
Triode wrote:
sbellon wrote:
I think you may be right. Looking at the source code of the Touch,
interrupts may occur in the middle of a bit. Then, in the interrupt
handler, free() is being called and releases only half of the bit.
Albeit being very rare, in sum several bits can get
Triode wrote:
Please explain what you mean that interrupts occur in the middle of a
bit?
Ouch, I would have thought that it is obvious from my posting that I'm
not serious about what I wrote without the need for irony or sarcasm
tags. I just could not hesitate to write my posting when
azinck3 wrote:
Triode: I'm fairly certain sbellon was joking.
That was my interpretation too ...
kidstypike's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10436
View this thread:
azinck3 wrote:
Triode: I'm fairly certain sbellon was joking.
OK - apologies then... :)
Triode's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17
View this thread:
sbellon wrote:
Ouch, I would have thought that it is obvious from my posting that I'm
not serious about what I wrote without the need for irony or sarcasm
tags.
Damn, now you spoiled the fun. Just as it looked as if you had managed
to hook a troll on his own bait. A brilliant post imo,
shkorc wrote:
Triode, how can I locate the required patches? I'm used to performing
basic operations in the terminal, but never played with Linux kernels.
Thanks again for your efforts.
Not sure you can - if you can track down which changes to the linux
kernel made it work (which version for
aubuti wrote:
Damn, now you spoiled the fun. Just as it looked as if you had managed
to hook a troll on his own bait. A brilliant post imo, surpassed only by
the OP's Yes, of course response.
Sorry, for spoiling that soon, but I got worried as Triode seemed to
take my posting serious. My
No worries, you're absolutely right that you, triode, and others have
better things to do than play-acting, regardless of how entertaining it
may be for the rest of us.
aubuti's Profile:
This thread is like a train wreck. We know we shouldn't watch, the
outcome is predictable and ugly, yet we watch anyway. :)
toby10's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12553
View this thread:
Sballon, Happy to know we have different sense of humor! What a
brilliant contribution. But very soon the true thinking comes out:,
newbie, with no understanding of.. entering (meaning me), and well
respected experts (meaning himself). I invite some native English
speakers to find the right words
toby10 wrote:
This thread is like a train wreck. We know we shouldn't watch, the
outcome is predictable and ugly, yet we watch anyway. :)
+1 (really should be +1,000,000)
ralphpnj's Profile:
Sorry to disturb this incestuous forum of equal writers and
thinkers.
+???
gerardhn's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=57140
View this thread:
gerardhn wrote:
newbie, with no understanding of.. entering (meaning me), and well
respected experts (meaning himself).
Just to make this clear: By no means I consider myself an expert
regarding audio processing. I was referring to the other regulars in
this forum who tried to explain things
I have experimented with another Linux distro beside Ubutnu, i.e.
Mageia. It is also running Alsa 1.0.25 but for some reason the DAC is
not visible in /proc/asound/cards even though it is mentioned in dmesg.
I'm guessing the issue is not because of Alsa version, but something
else. I have run a
I have a new touch connected via ethernet to my network's router. The
server is always on and running windows 7:
Logitech Media Server Version: 7.7.3 - 1342008352 @ Tue Aug 21 02:04:16
PDT 2012
Hostname: MEDIA-PC
Server IP Address: 192.168.0.
Server HTTP Port Number: 9000
Operating system:
gerardhn wrote:
Sorry to disturb this incestuous forum of equal writers and
thinkers.
+???
+1 is typical internet forum speak for I agree with what the quoted
post said.
garym's Profile:
33 matches
Mail list logo
