Don't forget that you're addressing someone who talks about
bit-perfectness as if it was a relative concept.
Soulkeeper's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35297
View this thread:
OK, I can't resist.
I know this will probably convince nobody, but while doing the
high-sample-rate audio stuff n iPeng I got quite a bit of experience
with FLAC vs. PCM handling and also quite a bit of testing mileage.
And of course an iPhone is not a Touch and it's of course always on
WiFi.
I've been using LMS 7.7.2 for a while now without any major dramas.
Usually, if I add (say three) albums from the left pane to the playlist
on the right pane - all the songs in album 1 would be displayed in order
first, followed by all the songs in album 2, and then the songs in album
3.
A few
syrah wrote:
I've been using LMS 7.7.2 for a while now without any major dramas.
Usually, if I add (say three) albums from the left pane to the playlist
on the right pane - all the songs in album 1 would be displayed in order
first, followed by all the songs in album 2, and then the songs in
thanks mate, that was the problem. you can't imagine how peevish i feel
right now. muchos gracias.
syrah's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=54856
View this thread:
If someone built an (official/unofficial) update of the software.
Updated with the function WLAN on/off. That would be so nice. Like an
app in the server but in this case the tiny Touch server. I would
definitely buy such an app even if it's open software...
garym wrote:
This thread is starting to remind me of a posting I really like from
another forum regarding the typical audiophile response to being
questioned about his beliefs:
http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=92856view=findpostp=785522
Repeated below:
Pascal Hibon wrote:
Windows 7 users might want to read this:
-There is a gross problem with the Windows 7 RECORD Sample Rate
Converter. This problem actually dates back to Windows Vista, and is
also a problem with Windows Server 2008. This problem causes spectral
contamination of the
garym wrote:
OK. Aubuti and I just don't understand because we're either too lazy,
too stupid, or too poor. But SBGK understands your points. 'nuff said.
;-)
ad homimem attacks, Gary, I think you have lost the argument.
SBGK wrote:
funny how other forums look at hydrogenaudio as a bunch of kooks and
here they are revered, nuff said !!!
What other forums?
The almost dead Stereophile forum?
The just about dead Absolute Sound forum?
The only pattern I see here is that the forums which have a decidedly
No no silver is best for USB1.0 copper is better for USB2.0 .2.0 is
faster and must be tamed with the more mellow copper ;) and is there
synthetic material in those ? Asphalt saturated hemp is the best.
But I'm actually astonished that there is no paper/oil/lead/asphalt
cables in hifi ? It's
Mnyb wrote:
No no silver is best for USB1.0 copper is better for USB2.0 .2.0 is
faster and must be tamed with the more mellow copper ;) and is there
synthetic material in those ? Asphalt saturated hemp is the best.
But I'm actually astonished that there is no paper/oil/lead/asphalt
SBGK wrote:
funny how other forums look at hydrogenaudio as a bunch of kooks and
here they are revered, nuff said !!!
You're confirming that at the other forums, the inmates are in charge
of the asylum.
garym's
On 10/5/2012 3:40 PM, ralphpnj wrote:
Mnyb wrote:
No no silver is best for USB1.0 copper is better for USB2.0 .2.0 is
faster and must be tamed with the more mellow copper ;) and is there
synthetic material in those ? Asphalt saturated hemp is the best.
But I'm actually astonished that there
SBGK wrote:
funny how other forums look at hydrogenaudio as a bunch of kooks and
here they are revered, nuff said !!!
Even more funny is how in other forums some are very good in quoting
studies to proof things (often totaly out of context and wrongly
interpreted) and linking to pdfs of AES
nyaskivor wrote:
If someone built an (official/unofficial) update of the software.
Updated with the function WLAN on/off. That would be so nice. .
You can do this now with TT3.0. I have no idea why one would want to,
but it is easy enough to do.
dsdreamer wrote:
I have the Rega DAC too, BTW. Anything that has SPDIF as its output is
going to suffer from the main design flaw of SPDIF: namely the need to
recover the clock from the data. If you could go USB to I2S such that
the clock is transmitted explicitly and separately from the
17 matches
Mail list logo
