mherger wrote:
The problem is that I can't connect with the SBT server via web.
The server built in to the Touch does not have a web UI.
--
Michael
Uhm... what about this link?
mherger wrote:
Any case... is there some way to customize the SBT server?
Not much, no. Unless you want to venture and edit configuration files on
the command line using ssh and vi :-).
--
Michael
Ok, I'm not totally new to this kind of solutions.
Please, could you give some
Ok, I'm not totally new to this kind of solutions.
Please, could you give some hints, some starting point?
In Settings/Advanced you can enable SSH (Remote access). Then you'll
find the configuration file in /etc/squeezecenter. I'd suggest you play
with the prefs on a desktop installation
Saturn94 wrote:
For myself, I'm not looking for an Android app, just an app for my iPad
Mini (when I get it). My other half recently got an Android based
smartphone.
Sorry for picking up on the original question of choosing an App for
controlling Squeezebox'es.
But our household has
agentsmith wrote:
One more question on Vortexbox if I may.
Someone mentioned that my slowness is due to slow NAS. If I my
Vortexbox has no internal storage and access the same NAS through the
LAN, would I still experience the dramatic speed improvement?
I think Mnyb was saying LMS works
But my machine is 32 bit indeed...
Fukinagashi's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42922
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97454
agentsmith wrote:
- Is Vortexbox a software only solution? I see a lot of Vortexox based
hardware boxes.
It can be either. An old computer can be converter to Vortexbox or you
can purchase a Vortexbox Appliance (a small computer running Votexbox).
I have an old PC (2004) running Vortexbox,
Saturn94 wrote:
The issue I'm running into is when I launch iPeng on my iPad Mini
sometimes it doesn't see the Touch at all; there's simply no option to
connect to the Touch via iPeng when this happens.
Might be because iPeng is still trying to connect to the (now absent)
LMS.
Fukinagashi wrote:
But my machine is 32 bit indeed...
:/ then it should work ? no funny settings in file types like
disabling flac=native
Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143
View this
Hello !
I have recently bought a Emotiva A-100 amp which has a very nice
function : it detects when a signal comes from the stereo RCA input to
automatically power.
Problem is, I have hooked up my squeezebox touch and it seems that there
is always current on the RCA output (like the digital one),
Letten wrote:
Sorry for picking up on the original question of choosing an App for
controlling Squeezebox'es.
But our household has many squeezeboxes old and new, and we control them
from many different devices: PC's through webinterface, Android phones
and tablets, iPads, and the
I'm wondering if the Touch's analogue output is generally considered
inferior to a mid-level CD player WHEN USING a high-end receiver/amp and
speakers. (I realize a DAC can be a big improvement, but I'm not up to
that step yet.) For those who have listening experience using high-end
equipment
Short answer is there should be no difference unless your cd player has
a much better built in Dac. That's unlikely unless you have a cd player
costing more than 750, and even then who knows.
More likely, the touch is not as loud as the cd player so you probably
just perceive the slightly
garym wrote:
Short answer is there should be no difference unless your cd player has
a much better built in Dac. That's unlikely unless you have a cd player
costing more than 750, and even then who knows.
More likely, the touch is not as loud as the cd player so you probably
just
This is one of those very difficult to answer in the general sense. I
have a $1200 CD player that does not sound as good as the Touch, but a
$4000 one which is a lot better. Non of my less than $1000 players are
better than the Touch, but that does not mean it is universally true. I
certainly
giantpopples wrote:
Hello !
I have recently bought a Emotiva A-100 amp which has a very nice
function : it detects when a signal comes from the stereo RCA input to
automatically power.
Problem is, I have hooked up my squeezebox touch and it seems that there
is always current on the RCA
For the digital out .
http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=16069
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?77360-Disable-audio-outputs-when-off/page4
But it may not always help ,some dac's are to simplistic .
See this SB3 bug ,it has digital out off but...
mherger wrote:
Ok, I'm not totally new to this kind of solutions.
Please, could you give some hints, some starting point?
In Settings/Advanced you can enable SSH (Remote access). Then you'll
find the configuration file in /etc/squeezecenter. I'd suggest you play
with the prefs on
Unfortunately it's not quite this simple, a number of the important
files get regenrated at boot time (I don't remember exactly which
ones) so just changing the file doesn't work.
server.prefs should not be re-generated - and that's where most changes
would go. Just make sure the server is
Mnyb wrote:
Exactly , scanning files over the network is slow even if the server is
fast .
Almost no NAS comes close to 1g tranfer speed more often less than 100mb
in practice, and even if they did it still much slover than SATA or
actually even USB can be faster .
I see. Previously I
Many of us say that something sounds better than something else,
whether it be a comparison of DACs, CD players, digital audio via FLAC
files or via shiny discs, the Touch, etc., however I would speculate
most of us have not precisely level matched the components in question
and performed a
Thank-you all for your comments. I appreciate the time you took to
respond to my question.
gln2's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=58384
View this thread:
agentsmith wrote:
I see. Previously I had my friend helping me to install Squeezecenter
to my QNAP. I recall the performance was much better with about 30,000
tracks. Problem is I don't think I will be capable of reinstalling LMS
to the QNAP.
Of course I can always buy one more
Mnyb wrote:
No that's the other mystery, why is you server slow it should not be ?
Is not PureMusic one of those apps that tweaks the whole OS basically ,
can that have any influence on running a normal aplication .
Sorry to have confused you. My MacMini is the player directly connected
agentsmith wrote:
I see. Previously I had my friend helping me to install Squeezecenter
to my QNAP. I recall the performance was much better with about 30,000
tracks. Problem is I don't think I will be capable of reinstalling LMS
to the QNAP.
I find installing LMS on my QNAP became
25 matches
Mail list logo
